Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Page | Conservative Party (UK) (Log · Page History) |
User | Czello (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 114 |
Minor edits | 10 (8.8%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 28 (24.6%) |
Reverted edits | 21 (18.4%) |
atbe1 | 38.6 |
Added (bytes)2 | 9,618 |
Deleted (bytes) | -24,426 |
Minor edits
·
10 (8.8%)
Major edits
·
104 (91.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
28 (24.6%)
Manual edits
·
86 (75.4%)
Reverted edits
·
21 (18.4%)
Unreverted edits
·
93 (81.6%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2025-05-06 21:45 | Diff · History | -1,545 | Restored revision 1288947035 by Warriorglance (talk): I think saying the UK is no longer a two party system in Wikivoice would need far more robust sourcing than an opinion piece |
2024-12-04 06:55 | Diff · History | -22 | (reverted) Don't really need this anymore |
2024-12-04 06:55 | Diff · History | 0 | (reverted) Clear consensus for this ordering on talk page (already done in infobox) |
2024-08-29 06:54 | Diff · History | 0 | Restored revision 1242812222 by Cambial Yellowing (talk): That's not clear from the statement (and is also unsourced); I don't see an issue with the status quo wording |
2024-08-28 21:18 | Diff · History | 0 | (reverted) Restored revision 1242728898 by Ultra 348 (talk): "Unprecedented" isn't correct, though. There have clearly been periods of greater political turmoil in UK history |
2024-07-24 18:06 | Diff · History | 2 | Restored revision 1236381584 by Valenciano (talk): No "acting" about it – he *is* leader |
2024-07-12 14:41 | Diff · History | 0 | Restored revision 1234074006 by Cambial Yellowing (talk): Given how much quibbling has taken place over this infobox it might make more sense to change the lead (though there's no reason they need to match) |
2024-07-09 10:57 | Diff · History | 34 | Restored revision 1233455682 by Aidenqb1 (talk): It says *one of* the most successful, which is also sourced. |
2024-06-25 07:16 | Diff · History | -103 | Restored revision 1230854103 by Bhuyquang1 (talk): Let's add it when there's something to add |
2024-06-13 14:25 | Diff · History | -33 | Undid revision 1228845473 by JoBo GamerYT (talk) Restoration without reason, please seek consensus on the talk page. This was added with WP:CRYSTAL justification |
2024-06-13 14:21 | Diff · History | -33 | (reverted) Superfluous. We change this if it changes |
2024-06-01 07:47 | Diff · History | -2 | Undid revision 1226689703 by Agnimandur (talk) We're currently displaying this across all articles |
2024-05-13 09:10 | Diff · History | 1 | →Education and research: Past tense |
2024-04-12 14:48 | Diff · History | 2 | →1920–1945: Slight punctuation changes to cut down excessive commas |
2024-04-12 14:46 | Diff · History | -4 | replaced curly quotes (“”‘’) with straight quotes ("') per MOS:CURLY, by script |
2024-04-12 14:46 | Diff · History | 3 | tbh I think it should be the other way - on the centre moving out |
2024-02-12 12:51 | Diff · History | 0 | Restored revision 1206543976 by Thecolonpagesaretoocomplicated (talk): Articles generally go *from* centre *to* right/left |
2023-12-18 19:47 | Diff · History | 6 | Restored revision 1189416112 by Interpuncts (talk): Per sources, shouldn't be changed without consensus |
2023-12-08 13:41 | Diff · History | -25 | Avoid the use of "just" as it imparts perspective |
2023-12-08 13:39 | Diff · History | 0 | →2010–present: Return to government: Minor punctuation change |
2023-11-27 10:05 | Diff · History | 226 | Reverted 2 edits by 4ormulae (talk) to last revision by Wow |
2023-11-17 12:34 | Diff · History | 0 | →Relationships between the factions: Another case fix |
2023-11-17 12:33 | Diff · History | 0 | →Relationships between the factions: Case, this isn't a proper noun |
2023-11-17 12:31 | Diff · History | -28 | →Funding: Hopefully this will fix it |
2023-11-16 13:27 | Diff · History | -213 | Per talk, attempting to merge this section into relevant sections above. The Islamophobia section seems to focus primarily on the Cameron government, so I think can be merged into there |
2023-11-15 18:34 | Diff · History | -4 | →Party factions: Typo |
2023-11-15 18:30 | Diff · History | -428 | (reverted) →Sexual abuse: This appears to be disproportionate weight given to a single article; all following articles talk about more recent incidents |
2023-11-08 11:25 | Diff · History | 1 | Undid revision 1184109416 by Raffiti (talk) ridiculous |
2023-11-03 10:46 | Diff · History | 5,052 | Undid revision 1183286672 by Ruhrob (talk) there is a consensus on the talk page |
2023-09-22 14:23 | Diff · History | -169 | (reverted) Can you be more clear which source (with a quote) supports the statement that their shift to social liberalism has been challenged? |
2023-09-14 19:54 | Diff · History | 297 | Restored revision 1175400136 by DeFacto (talk): Pretty sure the current consensus is "centre-right to right-wing". I don't see a consensus to remove centre-right entirely |
2023-09-14 16:40 | Diff · History | 36 | Could do with an exact quote for this given the previous tendency for sources to be used that didn't explicitly support the claim |
2023-09-12 17:38 | Diff · History | -835 | Restored revision 1175033044 by Czello (talk): WP:BRD and WP:QUO. Several editors have now pointed out that this has no consensus, and literally only a single one (you) has argued for inclusion. Get consensus for this first |
2023-09-12 10:14 | Diff · History | -835 | (reverted) There is no consensus for the populist claim - please do not conflate that with positioning. Adding this is a separate discussion |
2023-09-12 09:29 | Diff · History | -993 | (reverted) Restored revision 1175027283 by DeFacto (talk): I agree this requires a *clear* consensus which I don't think I'm seeing (particularly for populism) |
2023-08-15 20:51 | Diff · History | -5,118 | (reverted) Undid revision 1170565519 by Aubernas (talk) still no consensus |
2023-08-15 12:32 | Diff · History | -5,118 | (reverted) →Controversies: No consensus for this |
2023-08-04 10:45 | Diff · History | -8,460 | (reverted) Restored revision 1167911798 by Michaeldble (talk): Obtain consensus FIRST please. It's only in the lead because you added it |
2023-08-04 10:19 | Diff · History | 1 | WP:DUMMY edit - I meant *talk page |
2023-08-04 10:18 | Diff · History | -7,228 | Undid revision 1168687069 by Aubernas (talk) Please discuss on takl |
2023-08-04 07:24 | Diff · History | -2,810 | Restored revision 1167911798 by Michaeldble (talk): Shouldn't be mentioned in lead if not reflected in body |
2023-04-14 16:11 | Diff · History | -17 | Undid revision 1149805666 by Adam Black GB (talk) absolutely needs consensus first |
2023-03-28 14:16 | Diff · History | -1,088 | Restored revision 1147032462 by Czello (talk): A controversial ideology like this absolutely needs talk page consensus (not to mention much better sourcing) |
2023-03-28 12:55 | Diff · History | -1,088 | (reverted) Reverted 2 edits by Holiptholipt (talk) to last revision by TruePennsylvanian |
2023-03-10 10:01 | Diff · History | 2 | Undid revision 1143856913 by DWMemories (talk) No, requires consensus |
2023-01-03 16:39 | Diff · History | -1,228 | Undid revision 1131319104 by Proxima Centauri (talk) rewording it slightly doesn't deal with the fundamental issue. You're not communicating and are at 3 reverts now |
2023-01-03 14:07 | Diff · History | -1,579 | Undid revision 1131291633 by Proxima Centauri (talk) This is clearly contested and should really require consensus per WP:BRD |
2022-12-07 10:33 | Diff · History | -327 | Restored revision 1126068827 by DeFacto (talk): WP:NOTTHENEWS |
2022-10-24 16:38 | Diff · History | 0 | →Logo: Fix |
2022-10-04 16:12 | Diff · History | -860 | Restored revision 1114030093 by AnomieBOT (talk): Changes like this require consensus. We dont' change the entire party's position based on 4 weeks of a new leader |
2022-09-06 14:51 | Diff · History | -8 | replaced curly quotes (“”‘’) with straight quotes ("') per MOS:CURLY, by script |
2022-08-14 07:35 | Diff · History | -13 | →Boris Johnson (2019–present): Tidy up |
2022-07-21 11:44 | Diff · History | -147 | Not the title |
2022-07-07 12:21 | Diff · History | 11 | Restored revision 1096908037 by Czello (talk): No source that he has vacated the position as Leader - he is continuing to stay on until a new Leader is in place |
2022-07-07 12:04 | Diff · History | 11 | Undid revision 1096907617 by Luke99108 (talk) he remains leader until a new one is chosen |
2021-12-17 00:26 | Diff · History | 46 | (reverted) Undid revision 1060670333 by FriendlyFerret9854 (talk) Why is it redundant? It's not mentioned elsewhere in the article |
2021-12-09 17:37 | Diff · History | -80 | Restored revision 1059231065 by Citation bot (talk): If this is something Thatcher herself said, that wouldn't count as an WP:INDEPENDENT source |
2021-12-07 21:22 | Diff · History | 252 | Undid revision 1059168339 by B. M. L. Peters (talk) talk page consensus is explicitly against this |
2021-11-03 22:31 | Diff · History | 0 | Tidying |
2021-10-30 07:04 | Diff · History | 420 | No consensus to remove this |
2021-10-28 20:21 | Diff · History | -58 | →Free-market Conservatives: Simplifying |
2021-10-28 19:55 | Diff · History | -54 | →Traditionalist Conservatives: Simplify |
2021-10-16 23:09 | Diff · History | -1 | Restored revision 1050057198 by Alextheconservative (talk): Source says economic liberalism |
2021-10-09 16:43 | Diff · History | -375 | Restored revision 1048863519 by SPC27205 (talk): We don't do factions in the infobox, there's a section in the body |
2021-10-01 07:02 | Diff · History | -218 | No consensus to include this. One grouchy defector isn't enough to call party nationalist in the infobox |
2021-08-28 21:41 | Diff · History | -24 | Restored revision 1040909439 by Gepid (talk): Rv, please discuss on talk first |
2021-07-16 17:13 | Diff · History | -14 | Undid revision 1033912180 by MarvelousRohan12 (talk) no consensus |
2021-06-16 15:13 | Diff · History | -16 | No longer relevant; I expect this was added when she was PM |
2021-06-16 15:13 | Diff · History | -90 | →See also: No appropriate for the WP:SEEALSO section as it's too broad. Similarly, the Labour article doesn't list its anti-Semitism in its see also |
2021-03-27 20:29 | Diff · History | -18 | See the last time you were reverted |
2021-02-24 08:12 | Diff · History | -27 | Restored revision 1005624494 by TrottieTrue (talk): Rv, take it to the talk page |
2021-02-01 22:32 | Diff · History | -49 | Restored revision 1004127101 by MrDevonshire (talk): First link already links to British conservatism |
2021-01-21 17:56 | Diff · History | -16 | Altering this; I think "two party system" is a bit misleading for the UK (as opposed to real two party systems, such as the US). Keeping the substance of the comment, though |
2021-01-20 18:01 | Diff · History | 2 | typo |
2021-01-20 14:01 | Diff · History | -18 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 1001479342 by Czello (talk): You said yourself it's non-binding. You still need consensus for this |
2021-01-19 21:35 | Diff · History | 942 | Small error on my part; these citations were here before |
2021-01-19 21:33 | Diff · History | -14 | Further revert until consensus agrees to make this change |
2021-01-19 21:21 | Diff · History | 21 | Adding a note. Let's not start this again |
2021-01-19 21:20 | Diff · History | -980 | As before, this needs consensus first |
2021-01-14 07:18 | Diff · History | 42 | →Iain Duncan Smith and Michael Howard: Tidying up sentence |
2021-01-14 07:13 | Diff · History | -741 | Reverted to revision 999851810 by Czello (talk): Bigger revert: confirmed sockpuppet, now banned. No talk page consensus |
2021-01-13 21:14 | Diff · History | 13 | Reverted to revision 1000146075 by HMWikiSoldier (talk): Unexplained change |
2021-01-13 19:18 | Diff · History | -459 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 1000133900 by Czello (talk): Please stop edit warring. Please read WP:BRD and acknowledge you've understood it. I've also replied to your thread on the talk page with the reasoning about why we should leave this off until we have consensus |
2021-01-13 19:13 | Diff · History | -184 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 1000133185 by Czello (talk): *You* need to get consensus first as per WP:BRD. Please start a thread and we'll discuss there |
2021-01-13 19:08 | Diff · History | -195 | (reverted) Actually I'm going to go for a bigger revert -- this is overloading the infobox. The specific wings of the party are detailed in the body of the article. We don't need factions here when we have a pretty lengthy section on them further down |
2021-01-13 19:06 | Diff · History | 8 | (reverted) Why change this? |
2021-01-13 19:05 | Diff · History | -275 | (reverted) Once again, please get consensus for this first |
2021-01-13 18:27 | Diff · History | -190 | Reverted to revision 999851810 by Czello (talk): Rv this has been discussed before; please get talk page consensus before inclusion |
2021-01-12 07:48 | Diff · History | 1 | CE |
2020-12-10 12:20 | Diff · History | -149 | Reverted to revision 992864415 by MrDevonshire (talk): This has been discussed before not to be included in the infobox as it's not a broad ideology from the top to the bottom of the party. Please acheive consensus on the talk page before inclusion |
2020-09-30 20:19 | Diff · History | -22 | No consensus to include this |
2020-07-12 07:55 | Diff · History | 654 | Reverted 2 edits by Florenceandthemachine32 (talk) to last revision by Snowded (TW) |
2017-05-03 07:39 | Diff · History | 106 | Adding citation |
2017-03-05 19:57 | Diff · History | -1 | These were incorrect |
2015-05-19 20:22 | Diff · History | 0 | Fixing as per the official state: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/ |
2014-05-10 17:38 | Diff · History | -1 | Reverted to revision 607799880 by David J Johnson (talk). (TW) |
2014-05-04 08:15 | Diff · History | -311 | Reverted to revision 606790590 by Emeraude (talk): Case of recentism; we don't list individual controversies like this here. (TW) |
2014-01-08 23:21 | Diff · History | 14 | Reverted to revision 589502172 by David J Johnson (talk). (TW) |
2013-10-15 11:33 | Diff · History | 13 | Undid revision 577265824 by 31.192.98.2 (talk) |
2013-10-14 13:56 | Diff · History | -1 | Reverted 1 edit by Jayroyal57 (talk) to last revision by Richard BB. (TW) |
2013-10-10 07:53 | Diff · History | -34 | Reverted to revision 575701272 by 92.40.248.69 (talk): Obviously not a Eurosceptic party. (TW) |
2013-08-09 10:36 | Diff · History | 0 | Almost |
2013-07-02 08:20 | Diff · History | 1 | Reverted to revision 562396258 by Matthewrobinson9: Rv; it was 1834, and I do not believe the is a cat for this. (TW) |
2013-06-24 15:34 | Diff · History | -28 | Reverted to revision 561372701 by Richard BB: Rv; not in citation. (TW) |
2013-06-24 15:23 | Diff · History | -14 | Reverted to revision 560967646 by Nmconsulting. (TW) |
2013-05-29 15:26 | Diff · History | 74 | →External links: Hatting |
2013-05-23 18:10 | Diff · History | -2,658 | Reverted to revision 556461708 by Richard BB: Take it to the talk page. (TW) |
2013-05-23 18:00 | Diff · History | -2,658 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 556444924 by Richard BB: You've cited Wikipedia again. These changes are controversial: please take them to the talk page. (TW) |
2013-05-23 15:46 | Diff · History | -1,826 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 556291704 by Bastin: This is all unsourced. Please provide citations. (TW) |
2013-05-04 20:54 | Diff · History | 55 | added Category:Libertarian parties in the United Kingdom using HotCat |
2013-04-29 10:00 | Diff · History | 4 | Re-ordering, though I'm not sure we need conservatism. If anyone wants to remove, go ahead |
2013-04-23 20:50 | Diff · History | -145 | Reverted to revision 551793537 by Materialscientist: Unsourced PoV. (TW) |
2013-04-19 14:37 | Diff · History | 149 | Incorrect copyright applied: you are not the copyright holder of this image |
2013-04-19 14:23 | Diff · History | 1,170 | Reverted 1 edit by 82.42.143.61 (talk) to last revision by Tony1. (TW) |
All times are in UTC.