Select Page
Back CzelloConservative Party (UK) • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Conservative Party (UK) (Log · Page History)
User Czello (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 114
Minor edits 10 (8.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits 28 (24.6%)
Reverted edits 21 (18.4%)
atbe1 38.6
Added (bytes)2 9,618
Deleted (bytes) -24,426
Minor edits · 10 (8.8%)
Major edits · 104 (91.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 28 (24.6%)
Manual edits · 86 (75.4%)
Reverted edits · 21 (18.4%)
Unreverted edits · 93 (81.6%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History -1,545 Restored revision 1288947035 by Warriorglance (talk): I think saying the UK is no longer a two party system in Wikivoice would need far more robust sourcing than an opinion piece
Diff · History -22 (reverted)  Don't really need this anymore
Diff · History 0 (reverted)  Clear consensus for this ordering on talk page (already done in infobox)
Diff · History 0 Restored revision 1242812222 by Cambial Yellowing (talk): That's not clear from the statement (and is also unsourced); I don't see an issue with the status quo wording
Diff · History 0 (reverted)  Restored revision 1242728898 by Ultra 348 (talk): "Unprecedented" isn't correct, though. There have clearly been periods of greater political turmoil in UK history
Diff · History 2 Restored revision 1236381584 by Valenciano (talk): No "acting" about it – he *is* leader
Diff · History 0 Restored revision 1234074006 by Cambial Yellowing (talk): Given how much quibbling has taken place over this infobox it might make more sense to change the lead (though there's no reason they need to match)
Diff · History 34 Restored revision 1233455682 by Aidenqb1 (talk): It says *one of* the most successful, which is also sourced.
Diff · History -103 Restored revision 1230854103 by Bhuyquang1 (talk): Let's add it when there's something to add
Diff · History -33 Undid revision 1228845473 by JoBo GamerYT (talk) Restoration without reason, please seek consensus on the talk page. This was added with WP:CRYSTAL justification
Diff · History -33 (reverted)  Superfluous. We change this if it changes
Diff · History -2 Undid revision 1226689703 by Agnimandur (talk) We're currently displaying this across all articles
Diff · History 1 Education and research: Past tense
Diff · History 2 1920–1945: Slight punctuation changes to cut down excessive commas
Diff · History -4 replaced curly quotes (“”‘’) with straight quotes ("') per MOS:CURLY, by script
Diff · History 3 tbh I think it should be the other way - on the centre moving out
Diff · History 0 Restored revision 1206543976 by Thecolonpagesaretoocomplicated (talk): Articles generally go *from* centre *to* right/left
Diff · History 6 Restored revision 1189416112 by Interpuncts (talk): Per sources, shouldn't be changed without consensus
Diff · History -25 Avoid the use of "just" as it imparts perspective
Diff · History 0 2010–present: Return to government: Minor punctuation change
Diff · History 226 Reverted 2 edits by 4ormulae (talk) to last revision by Wow
Diff · History 0 Relationships between the factions: Another case fix
Diff · History 0 Relationships between the factions: Case, this isn't a proper noun
Diff · History -28 Funding: Hopefully this will fix it
Diff · History -213 Per talk, attempting to merge this section into relevant sections above. The Islamophobia section seems to focus primarily on the Cameron government, so I think can be merged into there
Diff · History -4 Party factions: Typo
Diff · History -428 (reverted)  Sexual abuse: This appears to be disproportionate weight given to a single article; all following articles talk about more recent incidents
Diff · History 1 Undid revision 1184109416 by Raffiti (talk) ridiculous
Diff · History 5,052 Undid revision 1183286672 by Ruhrob (talk) there is a consensus on the talk page
Diff · History -169 (reverted)  Can you be more clear which source (with a quote) supports the statement that their shift to social liberalism has been challenged?
Diff · History 297 Restored revision 1175400136 by DeFacto (talk): Pretty sure the current consensus is "centre-right to right-wing". I don't see a consensus to remove centre-right entirely
Diff · History 36 Could do with an exact quote for this given the previous tendency for sources to be used that didn't explicitly support the claim
Diff · History -835 Restored revision 1175033044 by Czello (talk): WP:BRD and WP:QUO. Several editors have now pointed out that this has no consensus, and literally only a single one (you) has argued for inclusion. Get consensus for this first
Diff · History -835 (reverted)  There is no consensus for the populist claim - please do not conflate that with positioning. Adding this is a separate discussion
Diff · History -993 (reverted)  Restored revision 1175027283 by DeFacto (talk): I agree this requires a *clear* consensus which I don't think I'm seeing (particularly for populism)
Diff · History -5,118 (reverted)  Undid revision 1170565519 by Aubernas (talk) still no consensus
Diff · History -5,118 (reverted)  Controversies: No consensus for this
Diff · History -8,460 (reverted)  Restored revision 1167911798 by Michaeldble (talk): Obtain consensus FIRST please. It's only in the lead because you added it
Diff · History 1 WP:DUMMY edit - I meant *talk page
Diff · History -7,228 Undid revision 1168687069 by Aubernas (talk) Please discuss on takl
Diff · History -2,810 Restored revision 1167911798 by Michaeldble (talk): Shouldn't be mentioned in lead if not reflected in body
Diff · History -17 Undid revision 1149805666 by Adam Black GB (talk) absolutely needs consensus first
Diff · History -1,088 Restored revision 1147032462 by Czello (talk): A controversial ideology like this absolutely needs talk page consensus (not to mention much better sourcing)
Diff · History -1,088 (reverted)  Reverted 2 edits by Holiptholipt (talk) to last revision by TruePennsylvanian
Diff · History 2 Undid revision 1143856913 by DWMemories (talk) No, requires consensus
Diff · History -1,228 Undid revision 1131319104 by Proxima Centauri (talk) rewording it slightly doesn't deal with the fundamental issue. You're not communicating and are at 3 reverts now
Diff · History -1,579 Undid revision 1131291633 by Proxima Centauri (talk) This is clearly contested and should really require consensus per WP:BRD
Diff · History -327 Restored revision 1126068827 by DeFacto (talk): WP:NOTTHENEWS
Diff · History 0 Logo: Fix
Diff · History -860 Restored revision 1114030093 by AnomieBOT (talk): Changes like this require consensus. We dont' change the entire party's position based on 4 weeks of a new leader
Diff · History -8 replaced curly quotes (“”‘’) with straight quotes ("') per MOS:CURLY, by script
Diff · History -13 Boris Johnson (2019–present): Tidy up
Diff · History -147 Not the title
Diff · History 11 Restored revision 1096908037 by Czello (talk): No source that he has vacated the position as Leader - he is continuing to stay on until a new Leader is in place
Diff · History 11 Undid revision 1096907617 by Luke99108 (talk) he remains leader until a new one is chosen
Diff · History 46 (reverted)  Undid revision 1060670333 by FriendlyFerret9854 (talk) Why is it redundant? It's not mentioned elsewhere in the article
Diff · History -80 Restored revision 1059231065 by Citation bot (talk): If this is something Thatcher herself said, that wouldn't count as an WP:INDEPENDENT source
Diff · History 252 Undid revision 1059168339 by B. M. L. Peters (talk) talk page consensus is explicitly against this
Diff · History 0 Tidying
Diff · History 420 No consensus to remove this
Diff · History -58 Free-market Conservatives: Simplifying
Diff · History -54 Traditionalist Conservatives: Simplify
Diff · History -1 Restored revision 1050057198 by Alextheconservative (talk): Source says economic liberalism
Diff · History -375 Restored revision 1048863519 by SPC27205 (talk): We don't do factions in the infobox, there's a section in the body
Diff · History -218 No consensus to include this. One grouchy defector isn't enough to call party nationalist in the infobox
Diff · History -24 Restored revision 1040909439 by Gepid (talk): Rv, please discuss on talk first
Diff · History -14 Undid revision 1033912180 by MarvelousRohan12 (talk) no consensus
Diff · History -16 No longer relevant; I expect this was added when she was PM
Diff · History -90 See also: No appropriate for the WP:SEEALSO section as it's too broad. Similarly, the Labour article doesn't list its anti-Semitism in its see also
Diff · History -18 See the last time you were reverted
Diff · History -27 Restored revision 1005624494 by TrottieTrue (talk): Rv, take it to the talk page
Diff · History -49 Restored revision 1004127101 by MrDevonshire (talk): First link already links to British conservatism
Diff · History -16 Altering this; I think "two party system" is a bit misleading for the UK (as opposed to real two party systems, such as the US). Keeping the substance of the comment, though
Diff · History 2 typo
Diff · History -18 (reverted)  Reverted to revision 1001479342 by Czello (talk): You said yourself it's non-binding. You still need consensus for this
Diff · History 942 Small error on my part; these citations were here before
Diff · History -14 Further revert until consensus agrees to make this change
Diff · History 21 Adding a note. Let's not start this again
Diff · History -980 As before, this needs consensus first
Diff · History 42 Iain Duncan Smith and Michael Howard: Tidying up sentence
Diff · History -741 Reverted to revision 999851810 by Czello (talk): Bigger revert: confirmed sockpuppet, now banned. No talk page consensus
Diff · History 13 Reverted to revision 1000146075 by HMWikiSoldier (talk): Unexplained change
Diff · History -459 (reverted)  Reverted to revision 1000133900 by Czello (talk): Please stop edit warring. Please read WP:BRD and acknowledge you've understood it. I've also replied to your thread on the talk page with the reasoning about why we should leave this off until we have consensus
Diff · History -184 (reverted)  Reverted to revision 1000133185 by Czello (talk): *You* need to get consensus first as per WP:BRD. Please start a thread and we'll discuss there
Diff · History -195 (reverted)  Actually I'm going to go for a bigger revert -- this is overloading the infobox. The specific wings of the party are detailed in the body of the article. We don't need factions here when we have a pretty lengthy section on them further down
Diff · History 8 (reverted)  Why change this?
Diff · History -275 (reverted)  Once again, please get consensus for this first
Diff · History -190 Reverted to revision 999851810 by Czello (talk): Rv this has been discussed before; please get talk page consensus before inclusion
Diff · History 1 CE
Diff · History -149 Reverted to revision 992864415 by MrDevonshire (talk): This has been discussed before not to be included in the infobox as it's not a broad ideology from the top to the bottom of the party. Please acheive consensus on the talk page before inclusion
Diff · History -22 No consensus to include this
Diff · History 654 Reverted 2 edits by Florenceandthemachine32 (talk) to last revision by Snowded (TW)
Diff · History 106 Adding citation
Diff · History -1 These were incorrect
Diff · History 0 Fixing as per the official state: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/
Diff · History -1 Reverted to revision 607799880 by David J Johnson (talk). (TW)
Diff · History -311 Reverted to revision 606790590 by Emeraude (talk): Case of recentism; we don't list individual controversies like this here. (TW)
Diff · History 14 Reverted to revision 589502172 by David J Johnson (talk). (TW)
Diff · History 13 Undid revision 577265824 by 31.192.98.2 (talk)
Diff · History -1 Reverted 1 edit by Jayroyal57 (talk) to last revision by Richard BB. (TW)
Diff · History -34 Reverted to revision 575701272 by 92.40.248.69 (talk): Obviously not a Eurosceptic party. (TW)
Diff · History 0 Almost
Diff · History 1 Reverted to revision 562396258 by Matthewrobinson9: Rv; it was 1834, and I do not believe the is a cat for this. (TW)
Diff · History -28 Reverted to revision 561372701 by Richard BB: Rv; not in citation. (TW)
Diff · History -14 Reverted to revision 560967646 by Nmconsulting. (TW)
Diff · History 74 External links: Hatting
Diff · History -2,658 Reverted to revision 556461708 by Richard BB: Take it to the talk page. (TW)
Diff · History -2,658 (reverted)  Reverted to revision 556444924 by Richard BB: You've cited Wikipedia again. These changes are controversial: please take them to the talk page. (TW)
Diff · History -1,826 (reverted)  Reverted to revision 556291704 by Bastin: This is all unsourced. Please provide citations. (TW)
Diff · History 55 added Category:Libertarian parties in the United Kingdom using HotCat
Diff · History 4 Re-ordering, though I'm not sure we need conservatism. If anyone wants to remove, go ahead
Diff · History -145 Reverted to revision 551793537 by Materialscientist: Unsourced PoV. (TW)
Diff · History 149 Incorrect copyright applied: you are not the copyright holder of this image
Diff · History 1,170 Reverted 1 edit by 82.42.143.61 (talk) to last revision by Tony1. (TW)
All times are in UTC.