This page is for requesting access to the AFC Helper script. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or AFCH in general, do so at the main talk page.

• All archived requests older than one month can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests.
• We generally do not notify users of acceptances, so check back often.
• Non-admins should refrain from closing reviews.

• Pichemist (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Had to take a break from editing & reviewing but now I'm back and ready to put in the work. (Re-requesting). _Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 07:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Kp2016rockin (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Just rerequesting. kpgamingz (rant me) 01:41, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been granted, and re-granted, AFCH access three times now, and had access removed all three times for inactivity. Why do you think the fourth time will be any different? Primefac (talk) 13:54, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• JustTryingToBeSmart (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hi Wikipedians, I have been editing Wikipedia for nearly eight months now, have received nine thanks, and have made more than 1,000 edits (around 900 of which were not deleted edits). I spent two hours reading the reviewing instructions and notability guidelines to further understand the scope of being a reviewer on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. Additionally, I have enabled AFCH in my gadget preferences and believe that I understand the WP:Deletion Policy, a policy on how articles, media, redirects, and various other pages that don't meet the relevant criteria for content of Wikipedia are identified and removed from Wikipedia. I believe that I meet the requirements to be an AFC reviewer after reading through WP:Deletion Policy and Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions. Sincerely, JustTryingToBeSmart. JustTryingToBeSmart (talk) 17:16, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now, I'll swing by your talk page with some more comments. -- asilvering (talk) 18:22, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• AgerJoy (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I mostly engage with improving new pages like adding cats, short desc. , etc. and also active in AFD, would like to help further in the AFC reviewing for quality and to help with the backlog. AgerJoy 19:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 19:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• PhoenixCaelestis (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I have been editing Wikipedia for nearly a year (with 1.5k unreverted edits) at this point and I feel I demonstrate an adequate understanding of both the notability and deletion policies, despite my few hiccups in the past. I am online almost every day, so I should have no problem replying in a timely manner. I am excited for the opportunity to further help new users improve through becoming an AfC reviewer. -Emily (PhoenixCaelestis) (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now. Given the hiccups, it would be really helpful if we could see some more AfD experience first. -- asilvering (talk) 20:40, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Sophisticatedevening (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Been wanting to help review submissions ever since I saw the backlog, I'm pretty active in RC patrol so I have experience with CSD, and I like to create articles for WiR once in a blue moon, so I hope I can be a good addition over here. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 21:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 19:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• JoBoGamer (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I have free time and would like to help out with the AfC WikiProject and i wana get more active on wikipedia nowadays and help out. JoBo Gamer 12:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done does not meet minimum requirements. -- asilvering (talk) 01:17, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you tell me which of the req i dont meet? thanks JoBo Gamer 09:00, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have 500 undeleted edits, let alone 500 undeleted edits to articles. As far as the other requirements go, you also have no AfD experience, and your sole article creation was deleted via A7 (it was also on a topic with which you appear to have a COI), so I would suggest getting more experience with notability guidelines before applying again, regardless of how many edits you have. -- asilvering (talk) 12:15, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hello, I would like to contribute to WikiProject Articles for Creation as a reviewer. I have a strong understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and have been actively involved in new page patrol, various cleanups , and AfDs (I have 89,4% AfD match). I read and evaluate sources carefully, applying them to notability guidelines, and have a good understanding of how the review process works. I am ready to review, improve drafts, share feedback with users, etc. Thank you. NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 14:33, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

draftification log checked: all good. -- asilvering (talk) 16:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 19:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Xrimonciam (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I'd like to help reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts and assist others in improving their submissions. I've learnt the guidelines, observed AfC decisions, and participated in AfD discussions, giving me insight into which drafts are likely to succeed. IAlso, I helped with removing unsourced claims from BLP and organizations pages mostly. I believe, my skills and efforts would make me an effective reviewer. Thank you. Xrimonciam (talk) 09:39, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Guninvalid (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hello. I am interested in helping to review new pages and go through the backlog. I have a lot of experience in AfC and AfD discussions alike, as well as a handful of RfDs as well. guninvalid (talk) 18:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now; you do have a fair amount of experience going through the AFC process, but much of it appears to be declined submissions. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Jordano53 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I'd like to help clear out the backlog, both here and in NPR, however I want to get some experience reviewing pages prior to applying for that user right again. I've been decently active over at AFD and GAR, demonstrating a solid grasp on both. Jordano⁵³ 13:21, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hello! I am a fairly new editor, but I know all of the policies. I have helped at AfD before (83.3%) and done editing in various subjects. I have no outstanding issues (copyvio, references, etc.). Of my two drafts, One was beaten to the main space by another draft. The other is sitting in the backlog. If I am rejected, please let me know what I should work on. Thank you for your time. Best, CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 22:40, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• MCE89 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hello! I'm interested in becoming an AfC reviewer. My account age has only just hit 90 days, but I have created 14 articles (5 through AfC) and have participated in about 160 AfD discussions. I also have experience with CSD tagging and have been active in reviewing potential copyright issues at Copypatrol. I'm keen to help reduce the AfC backlog and believe I meet all of the minimum criteria. Thank you for considering me! MCE89 (talk) 12:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• AKidFromBethany (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Experienced editor looking to join a new project. Over 800 edits, and experience writing articles akidfrombethany!(_talk|^contribs) 20:46, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, does not meet minimum requirements. -- asilvering (talk) 22:03, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Opm581 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hello, I'd like to apply for AfC reviewing rights in order to help reduce the backlog. I've participated in a bit over a dozen AfDs, and I have a 100% AfD match. I've also made a couple of articles (and I'm currently working on another one.) I meet all of the minimum requirements, and I believe that I will be a good addition to the AfC team. Thanks for considering my request. Opm581 ^{(talk | he/him)} 22:54, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ideophagous (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I would like to help reduce the backlog of drafts on enwiki. I was also requested to review a particular draft, but cannot do so without getting the approval. I also organize Wikipedia workshops occasionally, and it would be helpful to be able to review the submissions of new editors who participate in the workshops. Ideophagous (talk) 23:55, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. However, I would strongly discourage you from reviewing drafts at events you run, as there is a conflict there (e.g. you may feel pressured to accept unacceptable drafts, or want to not hurt someone's feelings). Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Primefac. What is your decision? The tag you added seems broken. Ideophagous (talk) 17:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ideophagous, you're accepted on a probationary basis. I've fixed the typo. -- asilvering (talk) 17:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Old-AgedKid (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hi! I've been editing and creating dozens of articles, many of them about living female politicians, both via AfC and directly over the past few years. I have also helped improve many other pages to meet Wikipedia’s standards. I’m familiar with core policies such as notability and verifiability, and have participated in multiple deletion discussions. Therefore, I’m ready to help with the line of articles waiting for review at AfC. I have also had some of my own articles deleted or rejected, so I know which pages are most likely to be removed or accepted. Old-AgedKid (talk) 12:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Knowledgegatherer23 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Looking for something new to do and want to help slim down the large backlog. Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 15:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Iadmc (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I have several articles that I have created. They aren't all still in existence. Draft:Laudonia (ensemble), for example. I did create 21st-century Western classical music in a former life as User:Jubileeclipman. Note I lost my password for that account. I have contributed ever since, however. I have experience as an editor of Classical music, mainly. Thanks. — Iadmc♫^talk  00:37, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks — Iadmc♫^talk  04:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• IVickyChoudhary (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights

I am working as Wiki editor from 2014, having 500+ edits and did work in publishing, reviewing, editing, improving wiki articles. Also knowing deletion policies. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, does not meet minimum requirements. -- asilvering (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Poriman55 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Done this previously before i lost my account. I'd love to help this project again, it was fun! I still remember how stuff works, but still read the rules again. – User:Poriman55 - Talk 11:08, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. -- asilvering (talk) 01:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My username has now changed from Poriman55 to EAKI78. This would also have to be changed on the participant list. –– EAKI78 - Contact 13:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- asilvering (talk) 17:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Reywas92 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Rerequesting to get back into this. Reywas92^Talk 00:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• AllCatsAreGrey (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I have thoroughly read and understood the reviewing instructions and am familiar with Wikipedia notability guidelines, so I am requesting afc helper script rights to help review AfC submissions. — AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 00:39, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Vivek Rai (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Extended break from Wikipedia but now looking forward to becoming active and contributing again! Vivek Rai (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now, can you come back when you have some more recent experience with article creation and/or AfD? Thanks for volunteering. -- asilvering (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Asilvering! Thanks - could I request you to reconsider this request? Please feel free to review my contribution history but I've contributed over 40+ live articles (5+ in last week) and would like to be able to assist with improved coverage of Biology and Medicine articles in AfC. Perhaps, I forgot to mention this but I used to be a AfC reviewer but became inactive, if that helps. If you'd like me to re-open the request, please let me know. Thanks Komodo (talk) 20:39, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think you need some more recent experience before returning to roles like AfC reviewing, especially given the issues other editors have raised on your talk page. A lot of things have changed over the past decade. But when I say "come back", I do mean it. :) -- asilvering (talk) 04:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply! Sounds good - hopefully you'll be better convinced in a few weeks :) Komodo (talk) 07:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cactusisme (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hello, I would like to be a participant in the AFC reviewing process by clear the backlog using the AFC helper script. I believe I have met the following guidline of having a Wikipedia account at least 90 days old, a minimum of 500 undeleted edits to articles and I have read and understood the reviewing instructions. I also understand the policies and guidelines mentioned in the reviewing instructions, including notability, notability guidelines. I am also active daily. Thanks Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 00:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Imwin567 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I’m interested to be a part of WikiProject AfC reviewer. I’ve read and familiarized myself with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines plus I carefully evaluate sources in line within notability standards. I’m ready to assist by reviewing drafts whether to accept or reject it and then improving its content. Imwin567 (talk) 08:11, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• FortunateSons (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hey, I'm interested in reviewing AfCs and would like to request access to this tool, as I believe that I have now gained enough experience to productively contribute here. I read and understood the relevant instructions, policies, and guidelines, and I satisfy the necessary formal requirements. Due to the current backlog, I believe that now would be a good time to start. On the question of relevant experience: I have created or translated eight articles, leading to two DYKs. Particularly in the first half of 2024, I have participated in what I believe is a sufficient number of AfDs (many of which have been contentious); excluding NC, the tool states that I have an 88,5 % match rate. I have also worked within a pretty contentious topic (I/P) without sanctions, and am active at RSN, which should indicate the ability to evaluate sources. Thank you! FortunateSons (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• NeoGaze (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I see there is a large number of waiting draft submissions and I want to contribute to reduce that number. I have created two articles and I have read the reviewing instructions. I have over 900 edits and some recent experience assessing/reassessing articles at WikiProject Wikipedia. NeoGaze (talk) 15:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Setergh (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I'll go by the criteria, which I hope is okay.

• My Wikipedia account is over 90 days old, nearing a year now.
• I do have 500+ undeleted edits, as of writing this close to 2,000 (98.1% of my total edits, as you can see here on my xtools) [1]
• I've fully read them, and have enabled the AfC helper script, also having read its instructions on how to use, when to use and why it may be useful.
• I read through the policies and guidelines in reviewing instructions, ensuring I understand them (including reFill). As for notability guidelines, I read through the main one I hope to be able to do (events, I'll elaborate on this later) and will remember to always refer to any of the notability guidelines in the future.
• I don't have much evidence of myself often trying to delete articles (at least not recently). However, I made sure to read through all the wikipedia guidelines relating to this and testing out how to use them to ensure I'm not confused when this does become relevant to me.
• I check Wikipedia quite frequently in case of any changes to for example my edits or mentions for discussions. I respond quite quickly, and I'm not a busy person at all, so I have quite a lot of time to do this.

Further information:
I feel that this project is something that would personally interest me. I've already spent my time before simply assessing articles (though not very recently, though it was definitely around 50 or so?). I do have my experience with helping inexperienced editors try and get into Wikipedia and teaching them multiple things that could help them. As for what I meant by being focused on events, I think you can see by my user profile I primarily deal with history (which I'd definitely say falls under events). I was wondering whether it's okay for me to mainly focus on that? If not for whatever reason, then I'll gladly make sure to spend my time checking out all sorts of articles for creation. However, this is just a personal preference. If you need to ask me anything further about this, go ahead! Setergh (talk) 10:06, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to add, but I also do definitely have lots of experience with page creation in general and this project itself when I just started Wikipedia. You can see all of my pages (created or heavily revamped) on my userpage. Setergh (talk) 10:07, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Zzz plant (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hello! I am interested in becoming an AfC reviewer. My account recently hit 90 days and I believe I meet the other requirements (details about contributions can be found on my user page). Full disclosure: I have 1 declined draft from when I thought National Academy of Medicine qualified for WP:NACADEMIC C3. If granted AfC permission I would defer to more experienced editors to determine which organizations are prestigious enough for C3, unless they are explicitly listed on the notability guidelines. Thank you for your consideration! Zzz plant (talk) 13:51, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• MediaKyle (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I've been thinking about applying to be an AfC reviewer for some time, but I wanted to wait until I felt I had a sufficient grasp of the applicable policies. I'd say that time has come. See my contributions page to get an idea of my work here. MediaKyle (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. -- asilvering (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• WuTang94 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

I'd like to assist with reviewing new page creations. As a veteran editor with years under my belt and countless edits, I want to be a resource for new editors who may use the AfC tool to make new pages and want to help provide helpful feedback. Granted, I may not have as much time on my hands now due to other responsibilities in life, but I want to help out where I can. WuTang94 (talk) 05:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• WormEater13 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Hi! I would love to volunteer to be a AfC reviewer. I've made over 1,200+ edits and meet the requirements to be an AfC reviewer (500+ article edits and account at least 90 days old). I'm very familiar with WP:N, WP:NPOV, and WP:VERIFIABILITY. I'm usually active in combatting vandalism and proposing AfDs/PROD/CSD, but seeing the massive AfC backlog, I would love to help clean that up as I get more free time. I am aware of the duties of an AfC reviewer, and what to accept/deny (can this draft survive an AfD if accepted?, etc). All of the articles i've proposed to AfC have been accepted, and none of my articles have been deleted. Would love to join the force! WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Iljhgtn (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) ()

Per a discussion at the Tea house where it was suggested that I may wish to be added to this list. I am therefore seeking inclusion on the list to help. Iljhgtn (talk) 14:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, you already have NPR, so you don't need this perm. Go ahead and start reviewing! -- asilvering (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]