Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xavion Alford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Xavion Alford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails all 5 criteria of WP:NCOLLATH. Longhornsg (talk) 07:04, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, United States of America, Arizona, California, and Texas. Longhornsg (talk) 07:04, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes WP:GNG with sources such as [1][2][3][4] Alvaldi (talk) 14:21, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The nomination by User:Longhornsg is based on the erroneous premise that a college football player must pass NCOLLATH. To the contrary, NCOLLATH is not an exclusive standard, and GNG remains the key guideline in assessing notability for college football players. Cbl62 (talk) 01:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The subject easily meets GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 03:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Subject meets the WP:GNG with the sources provided. WP:NCOLLATH need not be met. Let'srun (talk) 23:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per the sources provided above by Alvaldi. Ejgreen77 (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.