Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Formula, Vol. 2 with the option of merging encyclopedic content not covered at the target. Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Animales (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. Should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 22:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 22:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Found this two sources Hype Beast and The BoomBox. They only mention the release of the song. They can be used to support its release as a promotional single on the parental album. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 11:08, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect Minimal sources, nothing in depth. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 11:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.