User talk:Willthacheerleader18

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Hi Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Micajah Bullock. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Betty Cordon. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:41, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Adolf Wilhelm von Kessler. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed and nice day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on SAR Education Center and Museum. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a very blessed weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Just a heads-up in case you hadn't noticed the shenanigans here: someone decided to copy the content into an article about her husband and turn her into a redirect. I've disentangled the mess, I think. PamD 11:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Ingilby, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Ingilby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you are still interested in WikiProject Christianity. Please respond to this within a week if you are still interested in helping out. If you do not respond within a week you will be classified as inactive on the WikiProject member list. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 08:10, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sheriff U3: Still interested! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:46, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok great! I am trying to revive the project currently. If you want you can help out with trying to get it running again. I have a post on the projects planning page on what needs to be done. Most of it is checking on systems to make sure they work/are up-to-date. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 13:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: March editathons around the world Celebrate Women 2025 office hour series Tip of the month: You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing, and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks Moving the needle:[1] 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:53, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi. I was working on a page about her - User:GRuban/Allison Black - but she wrote me (on LinkedIn) that she would prefer not to have one. She didn't give a reason, but I took her at her word, and marked my userspace draft for deletion. She didn't explicitly ask me to ask you to delete this one, but probably just didn't notice it yet. --GRuban (talk) 01:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keilyn DiStefano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keilyn DiStefano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bridget (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in The European Destubathon in April. Almost $3000 in Amazon voucher prizes which can be used to buy books for content, though it can also be treated as an editathon if you're not interested in competing! Minimum content to be added to each article just to ensure that they're over a stub. Entries at the end of the contest will be tipped into the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge and European Challenge. Previous contests were really enjoyable and I'm hoping this one will be too! Sign up if interested. Thanks! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your thanks. Having looked closer at the page history, I can now see that you've been battling this sort of vandalism for some time now. Thank you for your effort! Pink Bee (talk) 19:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2020–2029 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 13:53, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teagan Livingston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teagan Livingston until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bridget (talk) 02:43, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Business Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (Events facilitated by others): The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025 Tip of the month: When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT. Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited, it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name. Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women) 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for creating so many fine new articles! gidonb (talk) 07:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gidonb: Thank you so much!! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 12:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Most welcome, well deserved! THANK YOU!!! gidonb (talk) 15:40, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rachel Jones (military officer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable for her military career. Mainly there is a burst of news coverage from when her story was published on the army.mil website in 2023 and caused a brief "controversy" due to her trans identity.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bridget (talk) 06:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel Jones (military officer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Jones (military officer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bridget (talk) 21:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cservenyák family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 00:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated several of your articles for deletion before and there was some other situation that I forget. I see a lot of deletions on this page, many of them successful. I think if people are targeting Will for extra scrutiny that is unfortunate and should probably not happen, but if it is not due to scrutiny, then I wonder what is up. Is it just a very high number of articles created? —DIYeditor (talk) 04:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I guess looking at your user page it does seem to be largely due to high number of article creations. Just make sure you pay attention to the deletion reasons and article notability rules, please. —DIYeditor (talk) 04:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]