User talk:Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira

Hello Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Woody's Kook-Out has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Episodes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^T 14:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to List of Peppa Pig episodes has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Rough Riding Hood has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, guys! Please, I need help about the page Rough Riding Hood!

For those who don't know, this page talks about a Woody Woodpecker episode parodying the Little Red Riding Hood fairy tale!

Please, I need the help of your contributions to put more references and details so this page doesn't risk being blocked and/or deleted and being well known!

And if you don't know much about it, please click on these links:

• Woody Woodpecker in Rough Riding Hood: A Walter Lantz Production - YouTube
• Rough Riding Hood (Short 1966) - IMDb
• Rough Riding Hood - Woody Woodpecker - Big Cartoon Database

So have a good day and good luck editing this page about a parody of the fairy tale Little Red Riding Hood, huh?

Sarah Vilela

Hello, guys! We'll need help about the page SMG4! This page is about to be deleted for no reason! And now, what do we do?!

We need to put in more details and more references about this Australian YouTube web series, ok? For example, these video links here:

• super mario 64 blooper short: The cake is a lie! - YouTube
• super mario 64 bloopers: the lie that was a cake that is a lie - YouTube
• SM64: a SM64 fairytale part 1 - YouTube
• SM64: a sm64 fairytale part 2 - YouTube
• SM64: a sm64 fairytale part 3 - YouTube
• SM64: a SM64 Fairytale finale - YouTube
• super mario 64 bloopers: Who let the chomp out? - YouTube
• super mario 64 bloopers: Boil the Big Bully - YouTube
• SMG4 Movie: Meggy's Destiny - YouTube
• SMG4 Movie: 10 Year Anniversary Special - YouTube

So, have good luck with this contribution from this page, which talks about the Australian web series SMG4!

Sarah Vilela

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please note that disambiguation pages like Honey (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 23:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah. I'd just like to draw your attention again to this message from 2023, specifically "Use exactly one navigable link ('blue link') in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated". Both I and ShelfSkewed have had to correct this now at Special:PageHistory/Out of the Blue. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 22:26, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, s---. Thanks, I guess... And don't forget, please, that I've been putting so much effort into these pages, and it seems that... You guys don't like this effort in the disambiguation pages so much. And don't tell me that... It's so that there's not so much work and complications in these types of pages on this site, right?

And thanks, then. Oh, we deserve it. Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 22:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We can always use more people working on disambiguation pages! Just please read the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts page that Leschnei linked above. And if you still have questions about disambiguation, feel free to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 22:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks a lot... And we deserve it. And I still need to do a few more important things on this site, since for example, there are still some page titles that are very similar, according to some research I do on the internet. Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 22:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Chanterelle (The Super Mario Bros. Movie) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15 § Chanterelle (The Super Mario Bros. Movie) until a consensus is reached. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Pop Diva (Paper Mario) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Pop Diva (Paper Mario) until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Chanterelle (Paper Mario) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Chanterelle (Paper Mario) until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_December_18#Ungulates,_again. – Fayenatic London 19:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes about poisonings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think so? Well, I was trying to help you... Please bring back this same category, okay? And I'm noticing that, mainly, there's an episode of the old Popeye the Sailor animated series that parodies the fairy tale Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And I bet you've heard of this episode...

So, what's your opinion on this? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 23:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes about princesses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Drmies (talk) 03:54, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, s---. Do you really think so? Well, I was trying to help you... Please, bring back that same category, okay? And I'm noticing that, for example, there are episodes of the series Once Upon a Time about princesses.

So, what's your opinion on this? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 23:43, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes about health care indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Super Mario Shirayuki-hime has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 18 § Super Mario Shirayuki-hime until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes about women indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes about birds indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Depictions of women in television episodes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:10, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Women in television episodes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Gender in television episodes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes about princes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think so? Well, I was trying to help you... Please bring back this same category, okay? And I'm noticing that, mainly, there's an episode of the old Popeye the Sailor animated series that parodies the fairy tale Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And I bet you've heard of this episode...

So, what's your opinion on this? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 00:00, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes about royalty indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes about nobility indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Historical television episodes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes about monarchy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:18, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes about the upper class indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira,

Do not create a dozen categories just so you can categorize a redirect from an animated children's show. You also shouldn't be creating dozens and dozens of unnecessary redirects but I'll talk to someone who works with redirects to see if these Peppa Pig ones should be tagged for deletion discussions. Just because you are able to create a page doesn't mean it's a good idea and valuable contributions to an encyclopedia. Don't create inappropriate and unnecessary pages.

And your edit summaries could be more helpful to other editors and actually provide a reason for your editing decisions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television episodes set in palaces indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series set in palaces indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:27, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira,

Do not create dozens of categories just for the purposes of categorizing one or two redirect pages. This is completely unnecessary. It's okay to categorize a redirect into a longstanding, existing category but you are creating categories just for random redirect pages.

Please review, thoroughly, Wikipedia:Categorizing redirects. And do not untag categories that are validly tagged CSD C1 and are empty if they are indeed empty. It won't stop an empty category from being deleted. If you want to learn more about the process of categorization and when it is appropriate, participate in WP:CFD discussions. But don't just mass-create categories for TV episodes which are insignificant and marginal in importance compared to TV series or movies, particularly when you are doing this episodes for animated children's shows which do not need content categorization. We can't categorize the content of the tens of thousands of TV episode articles and redirects we have, that is not the purpose of categorization which is used for defining and significant characteristics of notable subjects, not categorizing every time a princess is in a TV episode which would be hundreds or even thousands of times. This is an encyclopedia, not Fandom.

If you have questions about this or Wikipedia policy, please bring them to the Teahouse. Just a warning, if this mass creation of unnecessary categories continues, you might be brought to the Administrators' Noticeboard to explain your editing decisions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:24, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira. Thank you for your work on La congestión. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:21, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira. Thank you for your work on Los Niños Comen en el Restaurant. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but can you leave the audience surveys and other commentary out of edit summaries please? Thanks. Drmies (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Super Sam (El Chapulín Colorado) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 13 § Super Sam (El Chapulín Colorado) until a consensus is reached. Drmies (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using the Edit Summary to ask for the opinion of others, as you did with your recent edit of Phoebe (El Chavo Animado). An edit made by you is, and ought to be, an edit made by you and you alone using your judgment. Jlktutu (talk) 03:51, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira, do you even read messages on your User talk page? You post the exact same edit summary over and over and over again despite other editors telling you that it is inappropriate. Please stop the mass creation of unnecessary redirect pages with an uninformative edit summary. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:56, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe... It's just that I was trying to help these people with the redirection of pages of certain characters and episodes... And please, don't make me cry. Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 01:59, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please pay attention to what editors are saying. You've been asked not to use the same edit summary several times now, and you've been asked to stop making dozens of redirects. If this will "make you cry" then maybe you're not ready to be editing Wikipedia. ThomasO1989 (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, s---! And it seems that you get so nervous easily, just like me. And please understand that I'm trying to help you with the edits, and it seems that you didn't like certain things that I do virtually... But will I... cry?

For example, will there be time to create a page listing the characters of El Chapulín Colorado in a few days, or weeks? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 17:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you created a number of redirects from a television episode (based on the rcats used) to El Chapulín Colorado, but there's no episode list there. Typically, these would be deleted or redirected to a location in which the episodes are listed. Is there an intent to create a list of episodes? Hey man im josh (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... Thanks for your recent message... But I don't even know if in a few days or weeks I'll have time to create a page with a list of episodes about this same series. But it's worth trying to create a page about this same list, but I confess that it will take a long time to do so. Can I give you some reasons for this? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 17:00, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this edit summary either. It's not about what you want. Drmies (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, what a scare... But for example, what if someone wants to talk about works that are located in palaces? I was trying to help on the English Wikipedia, wasn't I? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 00:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-read what the issue is. "I wanted to create this category talk..." is not an appropriate edit summary, regardless of your intention. You've received multiple warnings already on bad edit summaries. If you do not improve, it may lead to a block. ThomasO1989 (talk) 23:10, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, s---! What a nervous... And don't tell me I'm exaggerating on this site. And please, don't make me cry... Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 23:19, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing the subject. Are you going to stop with the bad edit summaries or not? ThomasO1989 (talk) 00:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think so... Since you're making me nervous... Could someone please create some "talk" pages in my place, so I don't cause more trouble and nervousness on this site?

And besides, there are so many missing pages that worry me on this site, in my opinion... Ah, how nervous... So, thanks and good luck.

And for example, since there are no pages with several episode titles for the South Korean TV series Pucca redirected to the list of episodes of that same series... Will there be time to redirect five or seven more pages this week?

And do you really think I'm exaggerating? And as I said before, I was trying to help the English Wikipedia! So, thank you very much again and good luck again... Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 02:45, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you are asking. You want others to make talk pages? No--just stop with the weird (and copy-pasted) edit summaries. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks, I guess... And please, don't make me cry... What a... nervous... And there are people who don't understand a lot of things. So...

As I said before, for example, since there are no pages with several episode titles for the South Korean TV series Pucca redirected to the list of episodes of that same series.

So, I'm going to start redirecting two more pages related to this series, and let me know when you review all of this, but don't scare me too much, okay? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 02:53, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, User:Ohnoitsjamie, I don't even know how to respond to this. Drmies (talk) 02:59, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, s---... And there are people who don't understand some things, besides me... So, thanks and good luck once again. Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 03:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, stop changing the subject. Are you going to listen and stop with the inappropriate edit summaries? ThomasO1989 (talk) 03:50, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks, I guess... And maybe I'll stop creating "talk" pages in these categories, so as not to irritate anyone on this site. But do you think you'll be happy about that? What a nervous... Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 04:42, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And besides, there are things that I do or do not understand on this site. And for me, there are still some categories missing related to different places, for example. Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 04:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira. Thank you for your work on Chipote Chillón calibre 45. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, a nice thank you from a contributor... Thanks, and no problem! Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned a problem with the redirect. If there is no mention of the phrase, it would surprise readers. Please fix. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Really? But I put so much effort into it... And before I forget, I'm going to let you know that the draft of the episode list for El Chapulín Colorado, which is saved in a virtual notepad, will take a few more days, weeks or months to produce. Can I tell you a few reasons for that? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 15:43, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira. Thank you for your work on Por más que pese no pasa del piso del pozo. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, another nice thank you from a contributor... Thank you very much indeed, and you're welcome! And please don't forget that in a few days or weeks, I'll be creating the episode list page for the Mexican sitcom El Chapulín Colorado, okay? So, have a good afternoon and good luck! Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 15:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you understanding these messages you keep getting? You should not be creating redirects for subjects if they aren't mentioned at the location you're redirecting them to. You've gotten a lot of warnings about this. You need to stop doing this. Is this making sense to you? Sergecross73 msg me 19:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks, I guess... I understand a lot of things in real and virtual life, besides getting into trouble. And please don't make me cry, no. I get sensitive easily, don't forget, please. And regarding the draft of the El Chapulín Colorado episode list page, this production will take as long as it takes, for a few more days, weeks or months. Can I give you some reasons for that? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 02:05, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know anything about that episode list, I'm just talking about the redirects you keep creating. I want to make sure you understand the situation, because if you don't stop, your account will be temporarily blocked from editing. Its creating work for others to fix or delete. You've got to put more care into the redirects you're creating. Sergecross73 msg me 12:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks, I guess... And how nervous... But if I want, I will create a page of a famous episode of El Chapulín Colorado from a redirect to make more sense and details, so you can understand, possibly. So, what do you think about this? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 15:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is English not your first language? It doesn't feel like you understand what I'm saying to you. It doesn't even feel like we're having the same conversation. I'm talking about the redirects you've created, not drafts or article creations. Sergecross73 msg me 15:58, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, s---... How nervous, once again... Thanks, I guess... One example is that I'm Brazilian, not American! And if you haven't noticed, I'm still learning my lessons and trying to help other contributors with their edits, okay? And my anxiety may even increase, but I still need to see some necessary edits and some important pages that are missing... I understand some real and virtual things. We deserve it... Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't ask you if you were American, I was asking if English wasn't your primary language. There appears to be a language barrier. You can't seem to understand what people are telling you. And you keep using bizarre phrases like "how nervous", which, to my knowledge, is not a phrase people use in English. I'm a bit concerned your knowledge of English isn't strong enough to be writing and communicating on the English Wikipedia. Have you thought about editing the Wikipedia of your primary language? Sergecross73 msg me 16:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks... What a situation, once again. My primary language is Brazilian Portuguese, because I'm Brazilian! And I understand a lot of things... And there are things that make me extremely confused, irritated and nervous on this site... And in my life, too!

And about my primary language on Wikipedia in English... It seems difficult to edit, if I'm not mistaken. Or maybe I didn't know that part? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 17:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See if you find it easier to contribute to the Portuguese Wikipedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you very much, I think... But then, in your opinion, do you think there are a few more pages of episode lists missing on the Portuguese Wikipedia? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't understand Portuguese, and haven't edited that Wikipedia, so I wouldn't know the answer to that question. In general though, the English Wikipedia has the most articles and the other language Wikipedia are lagging behind. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for this recent information... There are people who don't understand many foreign languages, in this situation. Do you agree with that? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 11:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop placing unhelpful DEFAULTSORT tags, such as the ones you added to Special Delivery and Dream On. That's not how sorting works with phrases like those. They should just be sorted as they appear. —ShelfSkewed Talk 14:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, s---... Thanks, I guess... And I'm sorry... It's because I was trying to help out with the English Wikipedia, as I've been saying ever since. Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just STOP with the edit summaries. Please. Drmies (talk) 03:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, s---, again... And don't tell me you can't stand my obsession with trying to help with the editing of this site any longer. And please don't be so rude to me. And we deserve it... Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 03:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not rude. Stop playing the victim. Make your edits, explain what you're doing, leave the autobio and apology out of it. Drmies (talk) 04:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks, I guess... I'm sorry... And do you think I still need to learn more on this site? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 04:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to fear that your grasp on English is not strong enough for you to effectively edit the English language Wikipedia. You may want to consider editing the Wikipedia of your primary language. Sergecross73 msg me 22:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks, I guess... But for example, what if someone asks me if there is any missing detail, image and/or page on both Wikipedia sites (Portuguese and English)? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 22:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I mean. Your comment doesn't make sense as a response to what I just said to you. Nor do I understand what you're asking. This question doesn't make any sense as written. Sergecross73 msg me 23:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wow... We deserve it, and thanks for your recent response... We deserve it, we deserve it, we deserve it... Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 23:24, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making so many Peppa Pig redirects. These are not useful to anyone and you're risking getting blocked for disruptive behavior. ThomasO1989 (talk) 23:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, please don't be so rude... As I've been saying ever since, I was trying to help this site... And do you think I'm exaggerating? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 23:34, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Olá. O seu inglês é tão confuso. As pessoas não entendem o que você quer dizer. Eu olhei suas contribuições na Wikipédia em português. Você fala bem o português e deveria contribuir na Wikipédia em português. Aliás, a Wikipédia em inglês não precisa dos redireccionamentos que está a criar. As Wikipédias em línguas diferentes têm regras diferentes. --Moscow Connection (talk) 02:44, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for that information... And there's so much exaggeration on this site that I was blocked indefinitely. After all this, I started to feel sad. And how am I supposed to help this same site if there are people who don't understand this?

So, do you want to know, for example, the examples of disambiguation pages that are missing on this site? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(em Português) Ah, valeu mesmo por essa informação... E é tanto exagero nesse site que eu fui bloqueada indefinidamente. Após dar no que dar, eu comecei a ficar triste. E como é que eu vou ajudar nesse mesmo site, se tem gente que não entende isso?

Mas e então, você quer saber, por exemplo, os exemplos de páginas de desambiguação que faltam nesse site? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for replying in English. (It would take me too much time to write in Portuguese. I will just reply in simple English.)
1. English.
Your English is very bad. You are using wrong words all the time. For example, in this comment, you said: "Are you guys going to sue me?!", which means "Vocês vão processar-me?!" or "Vai levar-me ao tribunal?!". That really sounded terrible. And "exagero" is not "exaggeration" (wikt:exaggeration#English). You probably meant "drama", didn't you?
Alguns dos seus comentários são até assustadores. Porque todos estão em um inglês ruim.
2. Edit summaries.
Your edit summaries are very bad. Esses resumos/sumários da edição são tão maus, alguns são até assustadores: [1], [2]. Why "Good luck"? See the help page in Portuguese: pt:Ajuda:Guia de edição/Menus e ferramentas/Sumário de edição#Sumários de edição comuns. "O sumário da edição ou resumo da edição é o texto que descreve brevemente a edição feita a alguma página". You should just say what exactly you are changing.
"Oh, s---... I almost forget that..." – No, no, no! Just "the" would be enough.
"Putting another example..." – No. "Adding Snowy" – OK. "Adding a video game" – OK. "Adding "Snowy", a video game series produced by Aliasworlds Entertainment" – OK.
3. Redirects.
When you create a redirect from a cartoon episode, you need to add an {{R from television episode}} template like this: [3]. And sometimes a {{DEFAULTSORT}} template. See Template:DEFAULTSORT and Wikipedia:Categorization#Sort keys.
4. The administrators blocked you because they were afraid that you would break something. You need to speak English well to contribute to the English Wikipedia.
5. You can try creating disambiguation pages in "Draft" space. Like you did here: Draft:Up from the Depths (disambiguation). --Moscow Connection (talk) 15:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Português/Portuguese: Ah, valeu mesmo por essas informações e respostas recentes... Acho que não tem outro jeito de eu tentar contribuir nesse site, já que eu exagerei pra caramba nesses últimos dias. E eu acho que causei umas grandes confusões virtuais nisso inesperadamente... E não se esqueça, por favor, que eu fico sensível facilmente, tá?

Inglês/English: Oh, thanks a lot for this information and recent answers... I don't think there's any other way for me to try to contribute to this site, since I've been overdoing it a lot these past few days. And I think I've caused some major virtual confusion in this unexpectedly... And don't forget, please, that I get sensitive easily, okay? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 17:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to explain. You were blocked per Wikipedia:Competence is required. Even the Portuguese Wikipedia (pt:Wikipédia:Exige-se competência) says:
1.

O proverbial "elefante na loja de cristais" pode ter boas intenções, mas é claramente "ruim para os negócios".

(Você estava a criar muitos redirecionamentos desnecessários e mal formatados.)
2.

Se alguém não consegue se utilizar do português eficazmente e não consegue discutir bem com os outros editores, considere tentar convencê-lo a editar na Wiki de sua própria língua. Todos precisam de ajuda.

(Você não consegue se utilizar do inglês eficazmente.)
--Moscow Connection (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can experiment in the "Draft" space for now. Try creating disambiguation pages there.
And when you feel like you are ready to return, you can request an unblock by using the {{unblock}} template. (See Template:Unblock and pt:Predefinição:Revisão de bloqueio. Mas você terá que prometer não agir como um elefante na loja de cristais.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for this recent information... But I don't know if I'm ready to be unblocked today...

1. One reason is that I still need to do some important and not so important things in my life.
2. Another reason is that I still need to make an effort to create some drafts on this site, and let you know when it's completely ready, with lots of details and care (I hope).
3. A third reason is that I've been worrying about so many important and not so important things (real or virtual) in my opinion.
4. A fourth reason is that I've been making unexpected disasters, in real life and in virtual life.
5. A fifth reason is that I've been getting tired easily in my life.

Oh, we deserve that. So, what's your opinion on all this? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 19:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Português/Portuguese: Ah, valeu por essas novas informações recentes... Mas eu não sei se estou pronta para ser desbloqueada hoje...

1. Um motivo é que eu ainda preciso fazer umas coisas importantes e nem tão importantes na minha vida.
2. Um outro motivo é que eu ainda preciso me esforçar para criar uns drafts nesse site, e lhe avisar quando estiver completamente pronto, com bastante detalhes e caprichos (espero).
3. Um terceiro motivo é que eu ando me preocupando com tanta coisa importante e nem tão importante (real ou virtual) na minha opinião.
4. Um quarto motivo é que eu ando fazendo desastres inesperadamente, na vida real e na vida virtual.
5. Um quinto motivo é que eu ando me cansando facilmente na minha vida.

Oh, nós mereçemos isso. Mas e então, qual é a sua opinião sobre tudo isso? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 19:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, once again... Did you miss me? At least I found time to make my first complete draft on this site (I hope)... And look at the result, please: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lunch_(disambiguation)

And a few minutes ago I discovered that there are more meanings and titles of series and episodes that are the same as "Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner". And look at this too, please: https://www.imdb.com/find/?q=breakfast%2C%20lunch%20and%20dinner&s=tt&exact=true&ref_=fn_ttl_ex

And I also hope that tomorrow (or Saturday), I'll have time to create a draft of a disambiguation page regarding this title... And I hope you understand my concerns about my life (for example).

So, thank you very much, have a good Thursday night and good luck! Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 22:19, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah, did you read the links in § Disambiguation pages about disambiguation style? Every entry needs to have exactly one blue link. Not zero, not two or three, exactly one. If there is no article to link to, then there should not be an entry. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 22:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, s---! Well, that being the case, I'm going to save a good portion of the names of these movies without blue links with the help of a PC program so I can try not to forget, okay? Ah, what nervousness and worry! Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 22:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ThomasO1989 (talk) 00:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, s---! And don't tell me it's because of... My so-called exaggeration on this site. Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 00:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(clerking) Link to ANI thread -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:14, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 01:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]