User talk:JacktheBrown

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 24 hours may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For fighting bias in the face of heavy resistance, and sticking to your guns ModernManifestDestiny (talk) 15:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ModernManifestDestiny: thank you very much! 🎳 JacktheBrown (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, while we often disagree, I wanted to note that I appreciate your willingness to step into bitch made mode and do as your told like a good little boy margins on this website and they do you credit. Simonm223 (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Simonm223: thank you very much. On my part, I thank you for changing the course of the discussion, bringing it to a source search. JacktheBrown (talk) 18:33, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Simonm223: I don't want to intervene, but they're creating a new thread on the same topic (see: [1]). JacktheBrown (talk) 18:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JacktheBrown! Your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 07:24, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rotideypoc41352: all right. JacktheBrown (talk) 19:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Donald Trump and fascism. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. E_F⁵ 14:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is also a bad edit [2] - the comment I removed was contributing nothing to article talk and was clearly forumy griping without any possibility of constructive involvement. Simonm223 (talk) 18:48, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]