User talk:HRShami

Hello, HRShami! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thanks for creating Michael A. Schwartz.

User:DGG while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add additional material: his degrees and positions, chronologically, with dates. List also his major publications. It does relatively litle service to the encyclopedia to write stub articlesa s incompleteas this.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DGG}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DGG ( talk ) 20:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fistly, thank you for wanting to add to the encyclopaedic content available on Wikipedia. I'm just a little concerned that you're simply reposting information available on the IEEE website without it conforming to our policies on constructing Lists. May I invite you to refer to Wikipedia:LISTPEOPLE to appreciate that List articles should really only contain entries about notable people who already have articles about them here? Whilst a few cited 'redlinks' about people who haven't yet got articles might be ok, you appear set to create dozens of these IEEE sub group list pages containing very few notable people. Whilst I personally value seeing the contributions of scientists rather than petty sportspeople here, I'm not confident your List articles will pass scrutiny per WP:NOTDIRECTORY You may be better simply creating shorter list pages just of those 'notable' Fellows, and simply linking to the IEEE website so users can find all the others. In addition, please rewrite the introductory paragraph to these lists as they currny pinfringe other organisations' copyight. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nick Moyes. Thank you for informing me about this before I created all the lists. :D It is really a lot of work in getting the names of all the fellows, so I would have been bummed if all the lists were deleted after I had created them. I started working these lists because it says here at Wikipedia:Notability (academics) that anybody "who has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the IEEE)" is notable. So it means that every IEEE fellow is notable and deserves to have an article. Having said that, I did feel that most of the IEEE fellows don't have their standalone articles. So what do you propose I should do? I would hate to leave List of IEEE Fellows as is, with all those red links. Should I delete those pages?HRShami (talk) 03:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because I might br wrong, why dont we seek another editor's opinion? Let me sleep on it and I'll have a think who/where best to ask. Nick Moyes (talk) 06:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. My sincere apologies for the long delay in replying. You'll have seen a notification that I have asked another editor here if they would review my comment to you, and offer a second opinion as to the best course of action for you to take. I'm erring on suggesting that you create just one sortable list, naming only those people with articles on Wikipedia, and stating the section they belong to. Thus the list could be sorted by name or section, and new names added as other engineers have article written about them. Thus, I think all those red-linked List pages ought, indeed, to be deleted. But if they have a different view on this, I hope they will let you know directly. (I'm afraid I shalln't be around much for a while to give you further input on this. If you get no reply from Robert (and he does like to be supportive and helpful for page creators) you could ask one of my fellow Hosts at the Teahouse for their opinion. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 02:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nick Moyes, User:HRShami - What is the question? Is it about the IEEE Fellows who are not the subjects of articles? If the issue is whether the red links are appropriate, because red links should only be used for what are thought to be valid future article subjects, then I see no problem with the red links, because (as noted above) being a Fellow of the IEEE is a highly selective honor indicating academic achievement. Did I answer the question, or was there some other question? Robert McClenon (talk) 03:19, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the question we are discussing. Thank you for answering. I will go ahead and create the pages for these lists. I discussed this with another edits here who is also of the view that IEEE lists of Fellows should be created. HRShami (talk) 03:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HRShami

Thank you for creating Shafiqul Islam (academic).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the appreciation.HRShami (talk) 10:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I’ve just reviewed P. K. Ramachandran Nair. Thanks for creating such a good article! Happy editing. Mccapra (talk) 08:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I hope to see you around. ^_^ HRShami (talk)

Hello, HRShami

Thank you for creating Alicia Bertone.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the appreciation!HRShami (talk)

Need help setting up my wiki page. I am listed in the “Paleotographer” wiki page. Can you help or refer me to someone who can? I was referred to you because you set up a collegue’s wiki page. Thank you. 74.197.247.18 (talk) 01:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Please drop your name here. If you meet notability criteria, I'll add you to my to-do list.HRShami (talk) 04:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HRShami. Thank you for your work on Lyle Norman Long. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:21, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for creating Gregg Barak. It appears to be orphan, please do link it wherever it's appropriate. Good luck on your future articles!

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 13:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. HRShami (talk) 04:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HRShami. Thank you for your work on Garth Ehrlich. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HRShami. Thank you for your work on John Ballato. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:08, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HRShami. Thank you for your work on Dwayne D. Gremler. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Dale Miller (academic) is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Elbio Dagotto, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273 Online events: New: Alphabet run X, Y & Z | LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Green: June 2023 GA Editathon event page Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride/2023 global campaign The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page George N. Rouskas, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:38, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276 Online events: New: Women in Red's 8th anniversary | Alphabet run A & B | Sports Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Look out for contributors interested in writing about women and invite them to join Women in Red Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi HRShami, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 08:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. This feels like an award. :) HRShami (talk) 08:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For all the biographical articles you create! Kj cheetham (talk) 11:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! HRShami (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Rohr, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cinder painter (talk) 10:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]