User talk:fanfanboy

WikiProject Users

(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

This editor is within the scope of WikiProject Users, a collaborative effort to rate Wikipedia editors to assess the value of their contributions to the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can contest your rating and see a list of open tasks.[Humor]UsersWikipedia:WikiProject UsersUser:Sdkb//WikiProject_Users/templateUsers articles  Start  This user has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.  Low  This user has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello Fanfanboy, Thank you for your feedback regarding the Draft:Yehuda Glantz. I want to clarify that I am Yehuda Glantz, and I have a personal connection to the topic. I am carefully following Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest (COI) guidelines and ensuring that all contributions are neutral, factual, and based on reliable sources. I am collaborating through the proper channels by using the draft's talk page to propose changes and provide references that verify the content. I appreciate your guidance and want to assure you that my goal is to contribute to Wikipedia's integrity while adhering to its rules. If you have further recommendations or insights, please let me know. Thank you for your time and understanding. Best regards, Yehuda Glantz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yehuda J. Glantz (talk • contribs) 16:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i am confused why imagined and troll like content is allowed on wiki by Issan Sumisu? Subtletone (talk) 17:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources, like obituaries, state that he was born on December 31 rather than May 10, but I am unsure if they are reliable sources. 75.91.240.74 (talk) 20:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, on the basshunter version of I promised myself, you removed my edit on an old account for vandalism despite me citing genuine sources. Would you be able to elaborate on why that is? Thanks https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I_Promised_Myself&diff=prev&oldid=1269481324 Lovefromjuliaxo (talk) 23:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but it seems you may have gotten something mixed up. I was not the person who reverted you, that would be Binksternet. His reversion simply changed the articles version back to when I last edited it. fanfanboy (block_talk) 13:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Renewal RFC phase

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase III/Administrator elections.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This show doesn't even exist at all and it's fanmade. This was back when I was making stuff up (though I don't do that anymore) 71.3.64.166 (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Don't add false information next time. Thanks! fanfanboy (block_talk) 16:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would also highly recommend using edit summaries to clarify why you are making an edit. fanfanboy (block_talk) 16:31, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fanfanboy, you might want to change the background of your userbox as the wikilink to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints only gets a contrast ratio of 1.57, when it should at least be 4.5, according to MOS:CONTRAST. Nobody (talk) 14:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, I'm used to the link being purple so I never really noticed the poor contrast. Is brightening the link like I just did acceptable? fanfanboy (block_talk) 14:36, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That might have some dark mode issues. See this. Has 1.47 ratio. Nobody (talk) 17:46, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've removed the noinvert from the colored link template and brightened the link further. Looks like the contrast ratio is acceptable now. Also, I think this problem only applies to the dark mode gadget as I use the dark mode in the drop down under the appearance section in preferences and I have no issues on any part of the webisite (expect some semi-transparent sections like closures). fanfanboy (block_talk) 19:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few ways to use dark mode, some are listed at Wikipedia:Dark mode, and not all have the same issues. Nobody (talk) 19:51, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for letting me know, and thanks for pointing out the poor contrast. fanfanboy (block_talk) 20:05, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]