User talk:ZKang123

		The Premium Reviewer Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in the January 2025 GA backlog drive. Your noteworthy contribution (24.5 points total) helped reduce the backlog considerably! Here's a token of our appreciation. —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

first of all, (unrelated) i managed to go to hume mrt station. one thing that i kind of learnt (and would help once a RS is found) is that it's the first scented station (there is this blue box that sprays perfume every now and then, i took a picture of it) so that would def help for DYK. and secondly, there should be an art in transit book for the DTL. it is available in woodlands regional library if i can remember correctly... managed to borrow it last year. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 03:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I alr have pages of the DTL art book. Also, Newton station also has scents, so this isnt new. ST reporting on SBS scented stations.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 06:32, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh. thanks =D brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 00:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hume MRT station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Starship.paint -- Starship.paint (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hume MRT station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hume MRT station for comments about the article, and Talk:Hume MRT station/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Starship.paint -- Starship.paint (talk) 13:45, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Singapore Rail Test Centre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Starship.paint -- Starship.paint (talk) 14:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is GeoColdWater. Thank you.

You're being notified because you commented at the WP:Requested move that precipitated the discussion.

Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 04:25, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZKang123. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

- SchroCat (talk) 16:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sent you a response. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hume MRT station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Continuity by Andre Wee at Hume MRT station presents a stylised cross-sectional view of the historical Former Ford Factory? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hume MRT station. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hume MRT station), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, ZKang123! The article you nominated, Hume MRT station, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 May 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2025 Singaporean general election, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I noted that you have edited the content that follow a structure similar to 2022 Serbian general election, but consistency is something that I also aimed to write since the past general elections, and other elections that happened, but times have changed. I also understand why you decide to create the Electoral boundaries changes of the 2025 Singaporean general election and the Results of the 2025 Singaporean general election articles for the sake of the space, but if there is something for improvement and something for change, I can take this suggestion, but it will be good if that could be shared to Wikipedia:WikiProject Elections and Referendums as a reference so that it will be also a model example. However, no one is perfect in terms of editing skills, so I came here to talk to discuss this, now that the elections are over and the next election will be in around 2030 or so. Thanks. Sculture65 (talk) 05:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sculture65: I understand that, but honestly what I plan is that the 2025 elections page is to be the model for previous election pages. I'm afraid to say that I might have to do a massive revamp at least some weeks later, once edit activity died down more. My concerns at the moment are some uses of low quality sources (like mothership and The Online Citizen). After the revamp, I might tackle the other election pages, but that's also a bit out of my scoop since I usually edit MRT articles. I hope you will also understand when I have to make some bold edits.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 05:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and the choice of sources is up to the editor's discretion and they also do provide news sources, although that you questioned Mothership and TOC's quality, the main choice is that providing a platform for an election article is the most important, like something that I saw in the 2024 United States presidential election, for example. I also respected the edits of yours. Sculture65 (talk) 10:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]