This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2025. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
I'll review this either today or tomorrow. On the name of the critic, it's fine to include in the article but I'd go for the first hook to avoid turning the spotlight on someone who may not satisfy Wikipedia's notability criteria (I haven't checked, but seems like a good principle to me). Richard Nevell (talk) 18:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: All checks out. No issues with verifiability or copyright from the spot checks. I have a couple of small comments that don't need to be resolved but might enhance the article:
As it is the ninth book in the series, are there any recurring characters? Rupert Campbell-Black for instance.
Is the Laing review for the Guardian the same Guardian (Observer) review that is mentioned indirectly via Jarvis?
Purely a matter of preference for different styles, but instead of "Cooper spoke out about the difficulty she had in writing [some of the sex scenes]" could "Cooper later reflected on the difficulty..." be a suitable alternative? Richard Nevell (talk) 22:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]