This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Dimadick, if she was never queen, and Amalric was never even really king while still married to her, how is she a queen consort? She's just the woman married to the guy who is about to become king as long as he dumps her. Adam Bishop17:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
She has got back in again as queen consort in the infobox and succession box. My understanding is that she wasn't ever recognised as queen so the boxes are just stating the position "iure Vicipaedianorum": he must have succeeded on Baldwin's death, so we must have her as queen consort in our infoboxes. Is that right?
In any case, granting this interpretation, there was no vacancy preceding her: Theodora was very much alive at Baldwin's death. I take it the statement of a vacancy survives in the succession box from a time when we didn't count Agnes and the vacancy lay between Theodora Komnene and Maria Komnene.
I found another daughter, Alix, who died in childhood, mentioned in Nielen's ed. of the Lignages d'Outremer, so have added her to this article and Amalric's. Silverwhistle22:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]