Select Page

Subdivision (simplicial set)

Process of subdivision of the standard -simplex : The partially ordered set with , and forms a triangle, while the partially ordered set forms its subdivision with , and being the original triangle, , and subdividing the edges and subdividing the face.

In higher category theory in mathematics, the subdivision of simplicial sets (subdivision functor or Sd functor) is an endofunctor on the category of simplicial sets. It refines the structure of simplicial sets in a purely combinatorical way without changing constructions like the geometric realization. Furthermore, the subdivision of simplicial sets plays an important role in the extension of simplicial sets right adjoint to it.

Definition

For a partially ordered set , let be the set of non-empty finite totally ordered subsets, which itself is partially ordered by inclusion. Every partially ordered set can be considered as a category. Postcomposition with the nerve defines the subdivision functor on the simplex category by:

On the full category of simplicial sets, the subdivision functor , similar to the geometric realization, is defined through an extension by colimits. For a simplicial set , one therefore has:[1]

With the maximum , which in partially ordered sets neither has to exist nor has to be unique, which both holds in totally ordered sets, there is a natural transformation by extension. In particular there is a canonical morphism for every simplicial set .

Sd∞ functor

For a simplicial set , the canonical morphism indudes an -shaped cocone , whose colimit is denoted:

Since limit and colimit are switched, there is no adjunction with the Ex∞ functor.

The natural transformation induces a natural transformation . In particular, there is a canonical morphism for every simplicial set .

Examples

Directly from the definition, one has:

Since , it is fixed under (infinite) subdivision:

Properties

Using with results in the definition again.
  • Let be the set of non-empty subsets of , which don't contain the complement of , and let be the set of non-empty proper subsets of , then:[5]
  • The subdivision functor preserves the geometric realization. For a simplicial set , one has:[6]
Since both functors are defined through extension by colimits, it is sufficient to show .[7]

See also

Literature

References

  1. ^ Goerss & Jardine 1999, S. 183
  2. ^ Cisinski 2019, Proposition 3.1.19.
  3. ^ Cisinski 2019, Proposition 3.1.18.
  4. ^ Cisinski 2019, Lemma 3.1.25.
  5. ^ Cisinski 2019, Lemma 3.1.26.
  6. ^ Lurie, Jacob. "Kerodon, Proposition 3.3.3.7". kerodon.net. Retrieved 2025-04-19.
  7. ^ Goerss & Jardine 1999, S. 182