Talk:List of WWE personnel: Difference between revisions
InedibleHulk (talk | contribs) m →Is brock lesnar with wwe anymore?: In a leetle while, man. |
InedibleHulk (talk | contribs) m →Is brock lesnar with wwe anymore?: Botchamania. |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
I was wondering if brock lesnar has left wwe |
I was wondering if brock lesnar has left wwe |
||
After he lost the universal title to roman reigns [[User:Liljoshee|Liljoshee]] ([[User talk:Liljoshee|talk]]) 15:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC) |
After he lost the universal title to roman reigns [[User:Liljoshee|Liljoshee]] ([[User talk:Liljoshee|talk]]) 15:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
:As of earlier this week, Meltzer said he had a |
:As of earlier this week, Meltzer said he had a [https://www.cagesideseats.com/wwe/2018/8/23/17775554/brock-lesnar-wwe-raw-absence-report few days left] on his contract. So if not today, soon. Then it's off to the circus to ring in the new year. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] [[User_Talk:InedibleHulk|(talk)]] 03:52, [[August 25]], [[2018]] (UTC) |
||
== Why can't i edit? == |
== Why can't i edit? == |
Revision as of 03:54, 25 August 2018
![]() | Professional wrestling List‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Lists List‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
205 Live stars listed separate from RAW on Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/p/BlLlRwLnC5U/?hl=en&taken-by=wwe
On top of being called a brand by those on television and WWE's Youtube, WWE's social media is listing 205 Live as it's own brand. The majority here feel it should be in it's own category as well. Perhaps now is the time to make the move. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.213.92.177 (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- You have presented nothing new, since they always but 205 Live on these things. Its a division of the brand, not its own brand. You haven't provided anything that shows WWE officially considers it a brand, or a WP:RS calling it a brand. Wikipedia works on WP:V not what you claim the majority want. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 13:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Triple H, the boss of WWE on RAW listing brands "RAW, Smackdown, NXT UK, NXT, 205 Live". Boom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.213.92.177 (talk) 10:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
I've been in agreement with Galatz regarding how things should be listed...until now. Long ago, it was decided that we do things here according to WWE.com. Here's what WWE.com does: they list all champions by which show they are on. The drop down menu lists 205 Live as a show to search for superstars. Virtually everything is listing 205 seperately. I agree that it's likely time to make the move. 205 Live -- in my humble opinion -- should be listed after Smackdown and before NXT. Kjscotte34 (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Kjscotte34: They are listed separately because they are a division of Raw, not a brand. If you look at the WWE 10k filing it lists their brands as Raw, SmackDown and NXT. The WWE's Cruiserweight championship page discusses how they started as a division of Raw [1], yet if they are not a division wouldn't it say so? Wouldn't it say they got their own brand? They refer to Raw and SmackDown as brands in writing constantly, yet never 205 Live. They don't have their own live shows, they tour with Raw. Beginning with Backlash they started saying all PPVs are dual-brand events, yet the cruiserweight championship is defended on these events, why not call it tri-brand? So other than a listing on WWE.com, which would be just as logical with a division as a brand, do you have anything that supports it? Any WP:RS? Anything? - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 17:15, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, @Kjscotte34: Galatz has a very clear vendetta against 205. He deletes talk discussing why it should be it's own section and tries to get anyone who disagrees with him banned. No matter what the consensus is here, he'll fight it tooth and nail, moving the goal post each time or use strawman arguments just to not give it credit. It's very weird.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.213.92.177 (talk • contribs)
- Bottom page 8 (14 of the PDF), of their annual report, which can be found here [2], states "NXT has now evolved into our third brand after Raw and SmackDown a". So as of when this was published 4 months ago clearly the WWE's official position was they had 3 brands. They were listed under 205 Live for a while. So what has changed since this report was published? - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 17:22, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- They said third brand, not third and final. There's five.
- Bottom page 8 (14 of the PDF), of their annual report, which can be found here [2], states "NXT has now evolved into our third brand after Raw and SmackDown a". So as of when this was published 4 months ago clearly the WWE's official position was they had 3 brands. They were listed under 205 Live for a while. So what has changed since this report was published? - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 17:22, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
I've strayed away from the conversation until now, but I found the article on Lio Rush's 205 Live signing, which refers to 205 Live as the "purple brand" twice; in the body itself and in the article's subtitle. JTP (talk • contribs) 05:26, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Gala has said just one piece of proof and he'd accept it. There is the proof we need.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.213.92.177 (talk • contribs)
- @32.213.92.177: Good try but I asked you for one, something you have continually failed to do. There is no rush to change things based on one article when there is not a trend in referring to it as that. The correct approach per wikipedia policy is to wait and see what it is referred to as and form a consensus, not jump on one thing. Especially since we many times have used the consensus to go against what WWE.com has, check out John Cena on this page as an example. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 11:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- At this point, I'm done with civility. You're such a tool who has such a clear vendetta it's alarming. Proof upon proof, from the product itself to the man in charge of 3/5 brands to a WWE.com article calling it such that you asked for and you still keep moving the goal post and clutching straws. You're exactly what's wrong with Wikipedia and the reason why people don't take it seriously. Instead of wikipedia representing true and factual information, you have a bias and let that be the story instead. Embarrassing and a sham. One day the mods will ban you for this behavior, and I won't feel bad for a second.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.213.92.177 (talk • contribs) }
- You clearly did not read the comments that were said to you at WP:ANI by multiple people who were not me. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 23:54, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- At this point, I'm done with civility. You're such a tool who has such a clear vendetta it's alarming. Proof upon proof, from the product itself to the man in charge of 3/5 brands to a WWE.com article calling it such that you asked for and you still keep moving the goal post and clutching straws. You're exactly what's wrong with Wikipedia and the reason why people don't take it seriously. Instead of wikipedia representing true and factual information, you have a bias and let that be the story instead. Embarrassing and a sham. One day the mods will ban you for this behavior, and I won't feel bad for a second.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.213.92.177 (talk • contribs) }
- @32.213.92.177: Good try but I asked you for one, something you have continually failed to do. There is no rush to change things based on one article when there is not a trend in referring to it as that. The correct approach per wikipedia policy is to wait and see what it is referred to as and form a consensus, not jump on one thing. Especially since we many times have used the consensus to go against what WWE.com has, check out John Cena on this page as an example. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 11:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Gala has said just one piece of proof and he'd accept it. There is the proof we need.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.213.92.177 (talk • contribs)
@Galatz: Ummm! John Cena, Oh Yes! Nickag989 already reverted my edit regarding John Cena as he did same thing as that IP did regarding 205 Live. I even tried to vandalize IP Talk Page, I spuriously added block templated on his account, even if Admins try to block him, or try to warn him, He will never accept any warnings, never realize his mistake, he just made Wikipedia a Court as he continuously engaged in arguments like a Lawyer fought for a court case. He is likely a Sockpuppet of Vjmlhds. I was talking that Now I can perform an edit regarding John Cena's Status as a reverting editor recently blocked indefinitely Nickag989 and retired from wikipedia, I said this because you mentioned John Cena listed under RAW on wwe.com . CK (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Broken nutshell: Sorry, but I'm not IP 32.213 etc. I don't do socks...if I make an edit, I put my name to it. I went on record as saying I was standing down on 205 Live, and I meant it then as I mean it now...not worth the hulla-baloo. Don't appreciate the false accusations. Vjmlhds (talk) 18:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Kindly, There's a lot of difference between boss and employee, Triple H is neither a boss nor controls WWE wholly, Vinnie Mac is the real boss as Triple H is an occasional wrestler, He just named shows separately it doesn't mean that Cruiserweights are not a part of RAW brand, WWE.com is neither glitchy nor having any old updates, regarding 205 Live, WWE itself hasn't made any announcement regarding separation of RAW and 205Live, not even on twitter not even on their any social website accounts. other web materials that had been provided as the evidence are still unreliable sources that states 205 Live has been separated because WWE itself hasn't confirmed any update regarding it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Broken nutshell (talk • contribs)
Sami Zayn injury
Since long-term injuries are frequently listed in the Notes section, I thought it might be pertinent to list Sami Zayn's extended absence due to rotator cuff surgeries: https://www.wwe.com/article/sami-zayn-injury-interview (Also I don't edit Wikipedia very often; I hope this is the right way to bring this up)
Schaichopath (talk) 13:45, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Is brock lesnar with wwe anymore?
I was wondering if brock lesnar has left wwe After he lost the universal title to roman reigns Liljoshee (talk) 15:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- As of earlier this week, Meltzer said he had a few days left on his contract. So if not today, soon. Then it's off to the circus to ring in the new year. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:52, August 25, 2018 (UTC)
Why can't i edit?
Could someone tell me why i cannot edit anymore on this page Liljoshee (talk) 15:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- I would assume it's because you're a brand new user and this is a protected page. What are you trying to edit? Kjscotte34 (talk) 16:35, 24 August 2018 (UTC)