User talk:Jingiby: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
I blocked, but could you please create an SPI as I have no time. Thanks. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 20:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC) |
I blocked, but could you please create an SPI as I have no time. Thanks. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 20:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
:OK. [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby#top|talk]]) 03:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC) |
:OK. [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby#top|talk]]) 03:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
::However I have found out, that a new SPI was already created - [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/PavelStaykov]]. Regards. [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby#top|talk]]) 05:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC) |
::However I have found out, that a new SPI was already created - [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/PavelStaykov]]. Regards. [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby#top|talk]]) 05:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)помак |
||
== they make it easier == |
== they make it easier == |
Revision as of 15:03, 11 November 2017
Bulgar turks
Stop hiding recognition of turkic bulgars from Bulgar related articles. Your nationalist behaviour ruinslegacy of great bulgars. You can't run away from truth. You even have not proposed proper explanation of deletion of Turkic word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunner555 (talk • contribs) 12:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- As I already have mentioned by my revision, this article is not about the Bulgars' origins. There is also a section in it, called Bulgars and their Turkic origins is explained there. Nobody hids anything. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 12:40, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
One can mention bulgar turks in description of First Bulgar State. Founders of this state were only bulgars, no slavs at all. Slavs entered Danube during 1.Boris. Slavs participated in creation of Second Bulgar State. You are just being jealous of terms "turkic'. Gunner555
- Maybe you need to learn the rules of Wikipedia and a lot of history, before editing here? Jingiby (talk) 13:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I am little new here. So what? What rule are you referring to? You disrespect bulgar turks. Gunner555 (talk) 13:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Slavs moved into this area circa 550-600 A.D. That's what he meant by learning history - however, he's very guilty of this himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.169.37.4 (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Edit warring notice
You have enough edit history to know better. There are admins about with an itchy block finger about. See wp:3RR if you need to. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
BTW: The IP's edits do not constitute vandalism. See wp:vandalism Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 07:12, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, the following reverts are exempt from the edit-warring policy: Reverting actions performed by banned users in violation of their ban, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users.Jingiby (talk) 07:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Check here, please: IP:62.12.114.214 is confirmed sockpuppet of User:PavelStaykov. Jingiby (talk) 08:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Sock
I blocked, but could you please create an SPI as I have no time. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 20:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- OK. Jingiby (talk) 03:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- However I have found out, that a new SPI was already created - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/PavelStaykov. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 05:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)помак
they make it easier
to hear the quacking when they insult you in their native tongue. Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- The name of the new sock Кур За Джингиби is a swear-sentence. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 19:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- blocked. Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fanula Papazoglou
Hi. It seems you were correct in adding that Fanula Papazoglou was of Aromanian descent. After Googling her name, I found this (it's in Greek, saying that indeed she was of Aromanian - Vlach descent) from Miltiadis Chatzopoulos, who was a Professor at EIE (the Greek National Research Foundation). So I apologize for reverting your edit. However, please do provide sources (and, if possible, in English, so that they can be checked and verified) when making changes to such sensitive issues -there will be many people, even administrators, who won't bother to check the validity of your claims, or even to Google about the person you are referring to. Best. Ανδρέας Κρυστάλλης (talk) 21:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Ανδρέας. The controversy surrounding a Greek minority within the Republic of Macedonia stems from the statistical treatment of Aromanian population there, which in its majority has historically identified as Greek, as part of the Rum millet. Nearly the whole Greek comunity in Bitola during Ottoman times was of Aromanian descent. After the Balkan Wars and WWI, most of it moved to Greece. During Yugoslav times and afterwards the rest changed its identification in Aromanian, Yugoslav or even in Macedonian. The most recent census in RoM (2002) recorded 422 individuals declaring their ethnicity as Greek in the country, but most of them were descendants of the Greek Communist, who migrated to Yugoslavia after the Civil war. The Vlachs in the Republic of Macedonia, are officially recognised as minority, and number today some 10,000 people according to the last census. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 04:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC)