User talk:DoomsDay349: Difference between revisions

Welcome!

Hello, DoomsDay349, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- ReyBrujo 02:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed you answered something in my Talk page. [1] Let me quickly explain you how Talk pages work. When someone wants to tell you something, he goes to your talk page and posts a new section telling you something, like:

== Question ==

Do you know how many primary colors are? -- ~~~~

When you check the question, you are supposed to talk to his page directly. In other words, you go to the talk page of the one who asked you the question, and post the reply in a way he can easily find it, in example:

== Re: Question ==

Yes, they are 3. -- ~~~~

If he wants to tell you something more, he will go to your talk page and write what he wants there. In other words, conversations are usually split, what he said in your talk page, what you said in the other's talk page.

Sometimes, people will ask you that they will post replies in their own page, to prevent splitting the conversation.

So, when you find a question in a user's talk page, like in my case, he has most likely answered in the other's talk page. Talk pages are somewhat like "private" messages, so unless you want to say something or someone asked you something, don't reply in third's conversations. Hope it is clear :-) -- ReyBrujo 22:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user's talk page. DoomsDay349 22:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Yes, the article is mature enough. A stub means that the article gives the minimun information about the topc (in example, "Tanis Half-Elven is a fictional character in Dragonlance"), enough to answer "Who Tanis Half-Elven is?" but not enough to answer "Why Tanis Half-Elven must have its own article in Wikipedia?" -- ReyBrujo 01:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user's talk page.DoomsDay349 20:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, DoomsDay349! I saw your article: Kith-Kanan Silvanos. It is kind of confusing for me, a non-Dragonlance person, to understand it. Remember that Wikipedia is for ALL audiences! Let's work together to clean it up!

RelentlessRouge 01:57, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on User's talk page. DoomsDay349 02:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, DoomsDay349! I'm glad to see that you are contributing on a subject that Wikipedia doesn't have much of! Anyway, replying your message, it doesn't make enough hyperlinks to other Wikipedia articles. If you could contribute some of your valuable time to making articles related to Kith-Kanan Silvanos, it would be great! Also, if you could provide more background, it would be a superior article. Hope to see you around!

RelentlessRouge 02:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello once again, DoomsDay349. About your message to me about "what does background mean?", I'll give the following examples: What's a griffin? What's an elf? Those kinds of things. Let's work together!

RelentlessRouge 02:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! That's the spirit! If you need help, go to this page or the associated talk page. I'm sorry if I sound dumb asking those questions on what undoubtedly for you are basic vocab questions, but once again, Wikipedia is meant for a general audience. Good luck, and have fun!

RelentlessRouge 02:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On that article, I just created it this second, and that's really all the information I can find at the moment, so no I'm not planning on expanding at the moment, but I hope to be able to come upon some soon. Registered user 92 (talk · contribs)

Hello - sorry I didn't respond any sooner, I've been away from my computer.

Originally the Silveran Kanan article needed a more thorough introduction, but it seems since I placed that tag on the article you've pretty much taken care of this. The only thing I recommend adding at this point would be the author of the series - perhaps make it read "...the fictional series of Dragonlance novels, written by <x>". Good job! --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 02:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a heads up that if you're going to upload any dragonlance images, please place them in the [[Category:Dragonlance images]] or the [[Category: Dragonlance Covers]]. Thanks. ddcc 01:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]