Select Page

Talk:WWE SmackDown: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
70.15.191.119 (talk)
Line 202: Line 202:
::Foundz Itz... Thanks to a simple Myspace Music search of the words "Let It Roll" (which is part the chorus of the new song)... The new theme song is "Let It Roll" by Divide The Day. [http://www.myspace.com/dividetheday The sample is up on their Myspace page.]<sup>--[[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''Unquestionable'''</font>]][[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="green">'''Truth'''</font>]]--</sup> 17:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
::Foundz Itz... Thanks to a simple Myspace Music search of the words "Let It Roll" (which is part the chorus of the new song)... The new theme song is "Let It Roll" by Divide The Day. [http://www.myspace.com/dividetheday The sample is up on their Myspace page.]<sup>--[[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''Unquestionable'''</font>]][[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="green">'''Truth'''</font>]]--</sup> 17:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
i sse that she has been removed and that we had a little more of a talk about this. if she does become the announcer i would be happy to add her so till then.--[[User:Dcheagle|Dcheagle]] ([[User talk:Dcheagle|talk]]) 18:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
i sse that she has been removed and that we had a little more of a talk about this. if she does become the announcer i would be happy to add her so till then.--[[User:Dcheagle|Dcheagle]] ([[User talk:Dcheagle|talk]]) 18:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

== Vandalism by those in charge ==

|-
|'''The Cutting Edge'''
|'''[[Adam Copeland|Edge]]'''
|'''2007 - Present'''
|{{small|In-ring interview segment.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/smackdown/070601.html|title= SmackDown! results - June 01, 2007|accessdate=2007-08-01|publisher=Online World of Wrestling}}</ref>}}
|-

this should look like this.

|-
|The Cutting Edge
|[[Adam Copeland|Edge]]
|2007 - 2009
|{{small|In-ring interview segment. Ended when Edge was injured.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/smackdown/070601.html|title= SmackDown! results - June 01, 2007|accessdate=2007-08-01|publisher=Online World of Wrestling}}</ref>}}
|-

Edge may comeback. That is likely but as it stands right now he is out on a major injury and with that he is no longer a recurring wrestler on smackdown and with that as well his segment the cutting edge is no longer recurring and until he comes back sometime next year and officially does the cutting edge on smackdown again it should be considered over.

Revision as of 16:55, 6 October 2009

WikiProject iconProfessional wrestling Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconWWE SmackDown is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTelevision Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Undertaker Stripped of the Title

Was at the AC show tonight, Taker was stripped of the belt. Do we update this now or after the show airs?`Linknumbers (talk) 04:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After the show airs somewhere in the world. ArcAngel (talk) 12:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That really seems odd to me though, considering how wwe.com has Taker listed as defending the title on the May 2nd SD! airing. ArcAngel (talk) 01:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Consider yourself swerved.Linknumbers (talk) 12:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redundancy + Apology

Ack, didn't mean to click the vandalism rollback button on Twinkle. Sorry about that. Also, what's with the redundancy below the General Managers table? Theodore Long and Vickie Guerrero are listed outside, right below the table as GMs. Th 2005 (talk) 07:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

There is a current discussion on whether to move the article, please visit here for the discussion.--SRX 22:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why the hell do some SmackDown!s have "!s" and some don't?

RandySavageFTW (talk) 09:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because, before 2008, SmackDown! has the "!", and the show was called "SmackDown!" w/ the "!", the only thing that was changed is the name of this article, SmackDown!s with the !, are redirected to this page. We can't change the way things were.--SRX--LatinoHeat 11:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would we say: "Wrestling on its SmackDown! brand" or "Wrestling on its SmackDown brand"?

RandySavageFTW (talk) 17:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are talking about a wrestler that wrestled on the SmackDown brand before 2008 then you would say "on its SmackDown! brand". However if you are talking about wrestlers that currently wrestle on the brand then you would say "on its SmackDown brand". You should take a look at capitalization and Italicization on our project's Style guide for more info.--UnquestionableTruth-- 01:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request permission to move "WWE Friday Night SmackDown" to "WWE SmackDown" to avoid further confusion? AdamDeanHall (talk) 16:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to ask for permission. No one needs to ask for permission to move pages. What you need to do however is form a consensus so that the community supports your move as well. This issue has already come to numerous discussions and the end results of those discussions have been mixed responses. I personally think it should be moved to "WWE SmackDown" but its not up to me to decided where this page goes. If you want to take it to another vote, I wouldn't mind.--UnquestionableTruth-- 17:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well there was a vote, and it was decided that it should remain as it is, per primary sources, such as WWE and CWTV, they list the show as WWE Friday Night SmackDown. However, My Network TV lists it as WWE SmackDown, so once the show switches shows I think we can rename it, we'll see, as we aren't a crystal ball.SRX--LatinoHeat 20:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been transferred to WT:PW#WWE Friday Night SmackDown--SRX--LatinoHeat 02:59, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sooo...

I have a question. Are we going to add the Divas Championship to the list of titles yet, or are we going to wait until the match is shown and the two contenders are known? —Preceding unsigned comment added by King Shuckle (talk • contribs) 19:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such title, the title they referred to on television was the WWE Women's Championship.--SRX--LatinoHeat 20:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to tonight's episode of Smackdown. Talk of crowning the Divas Champion implies a new title. Otherwise Vickie would have called it the Women's title. Plus, this question exists on WWE.com on the Smackdown Section "Who would you like to see Natayla face for the WWE Divas Championship at Night of Champions?" So I suggest you go fact-checking like I have. King Shuckle (talk) 03:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We are aware of the new Diva's title. However due to the severity of the lack of information presently available we have chosen not to acknowledge the title yet. The last time a new championship was supposedly announced before the draft, it's existence turned out to be unnecessary (SmackDown! Championship in 2005). A note of the mention from tonight's episode would be acceptable though.--UnquestionableTruth-- 04:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is Smackdown the 2nd tier of WWE ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.243.45.71 (talk) 17:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current Logo
Alternate Logo?

So, these are two SmackDown logos obviously. The first being the current official logo used on tv and the other being the one used Pre-HD era. So I just wanna ask, because I think the the other logo should be named as the "Alternate Logo" used. I mean look at the supplemental draft page and the logo used to show the talent drafted.

http://www.wwe.com/shows/raw/wwedraft2008/7505418/

I took it here so it can be discussed by the community if we should do the edit or not :)

"The WWE Championship is now officially Smackdown" - Hhh210 (talk) 22:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Special episodes

Should Championship friday be added? it happened on May 2, 2008!! Adster95 (talk) 11:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Naming Convention Discussion & Resolution

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


 Not done

Move to WWE SmackDown? The logo doesn't use Friday Night Anymore, the only reference to it as "Friday Night SmackDown" is the CW and commentators. Currently, no where is it referred to it as FNS, [1].--SRX--LatinoHeat 02:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I don't mind the opposition, this was brought up on the talk page, so I just thought a vote would have worked.SRX--LatinoHeat 14:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scratch that. After seeing this, I oppose the move. SAVIOR_SELF.777 05:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Need facts checked, possible vandalism

I need the recent edits made by DX10 (Contribs)to be checked for factual accuracy because I am not an expert on wrestling. This editor has introduced deliberate factual errors into other articles and it is possible that this editor has done the same here. -- B.D.Mills  (T, C) 12:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"I Dare You" by Shinedown

Could the new theme for WWE Friday Night SmackDown be titled "I Dare You" by Shinedown, by any chance? AdamDeanHall (talk) 03:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that what the name of the song is?--SRX 03:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
nope; heres i dare u from youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLy2LDO1dSw —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.186.90.174 (talk) 20:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It Is the name of the song. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.127.253 (talk) 12:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I listened to this song and they used this song to kick off Smackdown on a commercial along with Wrestlemania XXIV. Snowydweather (User talk:Snowydweather) 8:43, 31 October 2008

This is the current Smackdown song as of October...... does anyone know the name of it шшє ₣дN ӧ9

im pretty sure its Airbourne - Going down http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2urIbuHimok&feature=related —Preceding unsigned comment added by WWE FAN 09 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WCW Smackdown

What about this? WCW Smackdown. Rare footage we've all forgot about. Should this be noted? 24.226.23.56 (talk) 05:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this. Another match from that night. 24.226.23.56 (talk) 02:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Already noted at The Invasion (professional wrestling). TJ Spyke 13:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

for the special episodes...

Can we put where they took place? (city, arena)

Umm most people would say that wouldn't be notable and you would probably need to add another row in! Although it could go in the notes. But I'm not sure if it would be notable enough sorry.Adster95 (talk) 16:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Theme song

Lets put the orignal theme song and the current one up as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cutting Edge

It was never discounted so it should be 2007- present. In the Smackdown! spoilers for next week Edge interviews Matt Hardy. Pavlen (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the CW at 11pm

I don't know if I'm the only one seeing this, but Smackdown is airing right now on the CW. Was going to add it to the list of channels, but wanted to discuss it first. I understand it is a replay from earlier, but here where I am (Middle Gergia), we don't get MyNetwork Tv. So I was wondering if I was the only one seeing it happen?--EmperorofBlackPeopleEverywhere (talk) 04:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you don't get MyNetworkTV is probably why. Your local CW affiliate is airing it (I don't know which one since you just said middle Georgia). Back when SmackDown was on UPN, the same thing happened (in markets that didn't get UPN, local Fox affiliates would air SmackDown). TJ Spyke 04:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. I didn't really get it.. Yeah, I'm in Macon, and the cable service doesn't come with MyNetwork. But thanks for that because I was close to adding it into the article, which ould've probably resulted in a large and unnecessary edit war. Confusion Resolved. Cheers!--EmperorofBlackPeopleEverywhere (talk) 05:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming Special

Smackdown will have its 500 episode soon, thats worth mentioning.--Cooly123 (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not if WWE doesn't say anything. If they treat it like a normal episode, so do we. TJ Spyke 18:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tazz leaving commentary

Maybe we should fix the commentray section since Tazz is no longer a commentator for Smackdown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.194.21.206 (talk • contribs)

WWE has not even confirmed whether or not Tazz has left. Even if the rumors are true, he could always re-sign before next weeks SmackDown. If the reports are true, then it would be changed next week after the SmackDown tapings. TJ Spyke 21:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican Transmission

Hi, I am mexican and I know that in Canal 5 only transmit WWE Raw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.170.178.85 (talk) 17:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. TJ Spyke 17:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Announcers

User talk:A.lanzetta keeps vandalizing the page and switching the order of Ross and Grisham for no reason. I have valid reasons to have him reported, I will let him try and explain why he thinks it should be otherwise. TJ Spyke 19:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The starting date of Jim Ross and Mick Foley should be the same as the ending date for Michael Cole and Mick Foley since WWE Draft picks become effective immediately, and JR and Foley finished the draft broadcast together. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.222.193.229 (talk) 06:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Grisham is the Play by Play announcer and Jim Ross is the Color Commentator. (User talk:A.lanzetta) 09:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So? There is no rule that the play-by-play announcer gets listed first. TJ Spyke 01:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the WWE Superstars section, it is listed Grisham & Ross. (User talk:A.lanzetta) 10:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you see them listed: [2]? TJ Spyke 02:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Superstars TV Show page on Wikipedia. (User talk:A.lanzetta) 10:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for why that argument doesn't work. TJ Spyke 16:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Has there been a time when we havn't listed the main play-by-play guy first? Mshake3 (talk) 20:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For events that Vince McMahon commentated on we list him first even though he was more of a color commentator. I don't feel that strongly on this, I was more annoyed that A.lanzetta refused to discuss it even after I asked him too. TJ Spyke 22:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I right now understand it. I'm sorry. (User talk:A.lanzetta) 03:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But why does it has to be Ross and Grisham? I just asking. (User talk:A.lanzetta) 04:27, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really care anymore. To me it just sounds better and more natural to say "Jim Ross and Todd Grisham" (the same way it just sounds better saying "Raw and SmackDown" rather than "SmackDown and Raw"). TJ Spyke 21:59, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result achieved on 08:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC) indicates that the article is to remain under the WWE SmackDown name per WP:COMMONNAME.

...and that is...THE--UnquestionableTruth--

 Not done

WWE SmackDownWWE Friday Night SmackDown — This is the correct and official name of the show according to WWE itself (http://www.wwe.com/shows/). The article was only moved because a couple of users think the show should use the abbreviated names used in some international broadcasts (nevermind that it's a US show broadcasted by a US company and the official name is FNS). - TJ Spyke 18:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Oppose -- per my reasoning in the discussion section.--Truco 503 18:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: Common name is SmackDown. We are the English pedia, not the US pedia. We're all not living in Americka TJ.--WillC 18:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I know that, I guess we should ignore that WWE makes it clear that the official name is FNS and that the international name is not the shows official name. Kinda BS that the article should not be at the shows official name. TJ Spyke 18:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose TJ, TJ, TJ, WWE SmackDown is the common name.--UnquestionableTruth-- 23:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose No one ever says "Did you see that great match on WWE Friday Night SmackDown last night? In other words, common name. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 00:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't know about you and your friends, but people DO say stuff like "did you watch that great match on Friday Night SmackDown?". TJ Spyke 00:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Or maybe its just you...--UnquestionableTruth-- 00:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • And WWE, WON, PWT, OWW, etc. The only time I see people say just "SmackDown" is when they want to abbreviate the correct name (like how you say "WWE" instead of "World Wrestling Entertainment"). I can't believe I have to defend the official name of the show being used as the article title, this should be a no-brainer. TJ Spyke 01:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • TJ again you fail to understand the reason for this dispute. No one is saying that WWE Friday Night SmackDown isn't the show's name in the United States. However, the correct name used in every other English speaking country is in fact WWE SmackDown. So, because the "Friday Night" name is only used in the U.S. and because we are not US-centric, the common name is simply WWE SmackDown.--UnquestionableTruth-- 01:18, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • I know that it is called that in some other countries, but WWE itself considers the show to still be Friday Night SmackDown and calls it that on the show itself and on its website. TJ Spyke 01:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
              • That is because that is what the show is called in the U.S. and that is what WWE considers the show's name to be in the U.S. That is obviously not the case in other countries. In the rest of the world the show's name is simply WWE SmackDown which means that WWE considers the show's name to be WWE SmackDown in the rest of the world. Do you see how your argument is weak? It is weak because it can be used to support both sides of the argument instead of just yours. Using your argument, WWE wouldn't call the show WWE SmackDown in the rest of the world if they didn't consider that to be the name of the show in the rest of the world. So again it comes down to this. WWE considers the show's name to be WWE Friday Night SmackDown in the United States, while in the rest of the world, WWE considers the show's name to be WWE SmackDown. So if the show is ONLY known in the US as WWE Friday Night SmackDown, then WWE SmackDown is the common name. Its as simple as that. --UnquestionableTruth-- 01:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: for the reasons already stated above (Common Name). Wwehurricane1 (talk) 06:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - article is currently at the common name, changing it to be US-centric goes against the WP:COMMONNAME policy. Have yet to see a good or convincing reason presented for the move to WWE Friday Night SmackDown. ♥NiciVampireHeart08:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I see that there is a reason for it to be called Friday Night SmackDown since WWE does often refer it as that on their program, but since SmackDown is the more common usage of the programs name, I don't see the reason to move it back. AfroGold - Afkatk 07:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:
  • Comment -- For one, yes WWE is a U.S. based company but that doesn't mean Wikipedia is. WWE does not only broadcast in the United States, but globally in international markets. The common name used by WWE for this program is simply SmackDown (like the brand name), and it is used as the name for the international shows, because in some countries, SmackDown does not air on Friday Night like in the United States. Per WP:RETAIN, we must find common names and spellings for articles and in general usage. Friday Night SmackDown is not how it's known in other countries. The same applies to ECW (WWE) and ECW on Syfy. Notice how these are the US names and how these are the common names. --Truco 503 18:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

John Morrison is the Intercontinental Champ, not Rey Mysterio.

During the Smackdown tapings last night Rey Mysterio lost the Intercontinental Title to John Morrison[3]. This change should be made in the Champions section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.123.223 (talk) 19:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Until SmackDown airs.... NO...--UnquestionableTruth-- 19:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just to clarify, I believe it has to air on U.S. television before the change is "official". ArcAngel (talk) 21:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just the first airing, not necessarily in the US (although I think it should be based on US airing). Until it airs, Mysterio will be listed. TJ Spyke 21:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Ring Annoucer Lauren Mayhew

There have been a lot of people that have tried to put her in as the new ring announcer and im not saying she shouldn't be there as i have seen and read the news articles say she was at last Fridays taping but the fact is that she was not on the air at all. So as she has yet to make her debut please re frame from adding her till she is seen on wwe TV.--Dcheagle (talk) 15:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Her official websites confirm that she does in fact work for WWE on the Smackdown brand. There is no reason it can't be added. Due to edit warring, I've opened a discussion for this on WP:PW Wwehurricane1 (talk) 22:46, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Stop spreading BS. This is the ONLY info her official site says about WWE: "Catch Lauren Mayhew as the new ring announcer / national anthem singer for the network fights on World Wrestling Entertainment WWE." Where do you see SmackDown ANYWHERE on her site? Also, don't try and claim Twitter or MySpace because neither have been confirmed to be hers and not just fakes (so they are not acceptable)

. TJ Spyke 23:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on WP:PW, the Myspace page (which has Smackdown confirmed all over it) is linked from her official site. It is legit. No one is spreading BS. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 23:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My Main problem to this is that she was not on last Fridays episode of Smackdown and wwe has not said anything to the fact that she will work on Smackdown im not saying she wont but till she makes her debut on TV and not just at the taping i say that she be removed once again tell the day that shes on the show. Just cause she said on her twitter that she was at the taping doesn't mean that that she was on the show. And one other fact that i would like to point out is that this could be seen as a Spoiler which we all know is not welcome on Wikipedia. I wont remove it myself but I do think consensus needs to be reached before any thing else is done.--Dcheagle (talk) 01:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:PW. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 01:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen it And still believe in what i said did you see her on the show last friday cause i know i didn't and don't you find it a little odd that WWE has said nothing about her at all. All Im saying is till we see her on the show and WWE says something about her I say we take the name down tell at least this friday when the next episode is.--Dcheagle (talk) 02:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A source needs to be presented that she works on the SmackDown brand. One that says she is in WWE only confirms she is in WWE, but one that she is on SD must be presented for her to be added to this one.--WillC 02:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Again, a source has been provided. For further information, see the discussion on WP:PW. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 02:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
She was NOT the announcer on SmackDown this week [4]. She should not be listed as the announcer until she actually ANNOUNCES on the show. Simple logic that even a kid can understand. TJ Spyke 15:34, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Dcheagle in the fact it shouldn't be added - just yet.--Celtic + Cross talk 16:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem... Ahem... just a heads up... SmackDown has a new theme song... Now carry on...--UnquestionableTruth-- 17:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Foundz Itz... Thanks to a simple Myspace Music search of the words "Let It Roll" (which is part the chorus of the new song)... The new theme song is "Let It Roll" by Divide The Day. The sample is up on their Myspace page.--UnquestionableTruth-- 17:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i sse that she has been removed and that we had a little more of a talk about this. if she does become the announcer i would be happy to add her so till then.--Dcheagle (talk) 18:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by those in charge

|- |The Cutting Edge |Edge |2007 - Present |In-ring interview segment.[1] |-

this should look like this.

|- |The Cutting Edge |Edge |2007 - 2009 |In-ring interview segment. Ended when Edge was injured.[2] |-

Edge may comeback. That is likely but as it stands right now he is out on a major injury and with that he is no longer a recurring wrestler on smackdown and with that as well his segment the cutting edge is no longer recurring and until he comes back sometime next year and officially does the cutting edge on smackdown again it should be considered over.

  1. ^ "SmackDown! results - June 01, 2007". Online World of Wrestling. Retrieved 2007-08-01.
  2. ^ "SmackDown! results - June 01, 2007". Online World of Wrestling. Retrieved 2007-08-01.