Select Page
Back Headbomb • Module talk:WikiProject banner • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Module talk:WikiProject banner (Log · Page History)
User Headbomb (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 135
Minor edits 14 (10.4%)
(Semi-)automated edits 2 (1.5%)
Reverted edits 1 (0.7%)
atbe1 38.9
Added (bytes)2 48,558
Deleted (bytes) -445
Minor edits · 14 (10.4%)
Major edits · 121 (89.6%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 2 (1.5%)
Manual edits · 133 (98.5%)
Reverted edits · 1 (0.7%)
Unreverted edits · 134 (99.3%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2023-07-15 14:04 Diff · History 552 →Add a warning that messing with categories could affect bots that make use of those categories, like WP:AALERTS and WP:RECOG.: :I'm not crazy, we did have such a warning before. ~~~~
2023-07-15 14:02 Diff · History 92 →Add a warning that messing with categories could affect bots that make use of those categories, like WP:AALERTS and WP:RECOG.: teak
2023-07-15 13:55 Diff · History 52 →Add a warning that messing with categories could affect bots that make use of those categories, like WP:AALERTS and WP:RECOG.: ce
2023-07-15 13:54 Diff · History 0 ce
2023-07-15 13:54 Diff · History 637 →Add a warning that messing with categories could affect bots that make use of those categories, like WP:AALERTS and WP:RECOG.: new section
2023-07-06 18:53 Diff · History 315 →Why are all banners white when collapsed instead of the usual beige?: :The left-alignment is also similarly jarring. Having things centered was so much better. ~~~~
2023-07-06 18:51 Diff · History 370 →Why are all banners white when collapsed instead of the usual beige?: new section
2020-11-19 02:49 Diff · History 46 →HOOK_NESTED_ASSESS: As well as 'Projects expanded' from mockup 2.
2020-11-19 02:48 Diff · History 348 :See also User:Headbomb/Sandbox/Banner#If_there_are_issues (3rd mockup, If there are issues), from a 2017 mockup. ~~~~
2020-10-28 15:06 Diff · History 244 :::Kill small. ~~~~
2020-10-12 18:12 Diff · History 287 :Probably a good idea to ping the forker, {{ping|Evad37}} ~~~~
2020-10-09 04:49 Diff · History -1 fix
2020-10-06 14:32 Diff · History 554 →Couple more: {{unindent}} Seems only US Roads and Maths need a bit of tweaking now. {{tl|Maths rating}}/{{tl|maths banner}} can be merged and converted to a proper {{tl|WikiProject Mathematics}} with the current metabanner though (discussion). ~~~~
2020-10-06 14:28 Diff · History 104 +{{WikiProject Citizendium Porting|category=no}} {{WikiProject Citizendium Porting/sandbox|category=no}}
2020-10-06 14:27 Diff · History 86 →Couple more: add two
2020-10-06 14:26 Diff · History 54 both work now
2020-10-06 14:21 Diff · History -54 (reverted)  test
2020-10-06 14:16 Diff · History 116 Undid revision 982121316 by WOSlinker (talk) discussion doesn't make any sense without it
2020-10-05 12:24 Diff · History 274 →Couple more: ::::::::It still moves, just not a whole lot. ~~~~
2020-10-04 15:23 Diff · History 294 →Couple more: ::Well, it could be converted, or its html adjusted, or whatever. ~~~~
2020-10-04 14:35 Diff · History 558 →Inactive project layout: ===Couple more=== There is one that still stands out, Template:MILHIST {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= {{WikiProject British Museum|class=xxx|importance=zzz|category=no}} {{WikiProject Military History|class=NA|category=no}} {{WikiProject Resource Exchange|class=NA|category=no}} {{WikiProject Physics|class=NA|category=no}} }} ~~~~
2020-10-02 21:46 Diff · History 249 →Inactive project layout: :Woohoo, party time. ~~~~
2020-10-02 17:55 Diff · History 19 ce
2020-10-02 13:26 Diff · History 304 →Inactive project layout: ::::::::Yes, Wikiproject names should always be centered. Looks great here. ~~~~
2020-10-02 02:57 Diff · History 440 →Inactive project layout: {{WikiProject Resource Exchange}} {{WikiProject Resource Exchange/sandbox}}:::::I added further testcases. Feel free to check {{tl|WikiProject Resource Exchange}} / {{tl|WikiProject Resource Exchange/sandbox}}. ~~~~
2020-10-01 19:37 Diff · History 74 →Inactive project layout: Nothing displays on mobile though, but I believe that's normal behaviour.
2020-10-01 19:35 Diff · History 2 ce
2020-10-01 19:35 Diff · History 306 →Inactive project layout: :::::{{Re|MSGJ}} looks tip top on every browser I have try (Chrome, Firefox). ~~~~
2020-10-01 18:10 Diff · History 273 →Inactive project layout: :::So far, this is looking beyond my skills. ~~~~
2020-10-01 18:02 Diff · History 38 , or how it interacts with {{tl|WPBS}}
2020-10-01 18:00 Diff · History 83 →Inactive project layout: It will likely take me some time, as I don't know how this template is structured.
2020-10-01 17:59 Diff · History 420 →Inactive project layout: ::It's something to do with Template:Inactive WikiProject banner I think. I figured someone here would know where the code was hosted and have a quick fix, but I suppose I can dig deeper. ~~~~
2020-10-01 16:06 Diff · History 780 →Inactive project layout: new section
2020-03-06 23:35 Diff · History -437 Reverted edits by 2600:387:0:9A2:0:0:0:52 (talk) to last version by Lowercase sigmabot III
2019-10-01 20:15 Diff · History 348 →What does ¬ do?: :It basically tells that whatever has ¬ in it isn't desired. So <pre>{{{category|¬}}}</pre> means 'don't categorize'. ~~~~
2019-08-06 15:36 Diff · History 262 →Should we maybe hide the importance-rating when an article is classified as "low-importance"?: :I don't see why we would do that. ~~~~
2018-10-13 01:17 Diff · History 280 →Links from redirects?: :::::At least not until {{phab|T14019}} is dealt with. ~~~~
2018-10-13 00:07 Diff · History 342 →Links from redirects?: ::Well, ideally, we'd want the banner to update, but without creating a link record. Because that's pretty annoying. ~~~~
2018-10-12 23:14 Diff · History 31 →Links from redirects?: Possibly Module:Pagetype?
2018-10-12 23:09 Diff · History 224 →Links from redirects?: sig
2018-10-12 23:09 Diff · History 3 ce/* Links from redirects? */
2018-10-12 23:09 Diff · History 534 →Links from redirects?: new section
2018-08-14 17:08 Diff · History 71 →FYI: list
2018-08-14 16:46 Diff · History 306 →FYI: new section
2018-05-12 13:20 Diff · History 350 :::If you object to the page being classified into top-importance aritcles, just don't set {{para|importance|top}} in the banner. ~~~~
2018-05-12 04:15 Diff · History 606 →Protected edit request on 12 May 2018: ::What exactly is the problem here? You've tagged the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology page with {{tlx|WikiProject Sociology|class{{=}}Project|importance{{=}}Top}}. "Project-Class sociology ''articles''" is simply an artefact of the underlying structure for the page categoriation. You could rename that to ''pages'' if that particularly annoys you, but nothing is broken here. ~~~~
2018-05-12 04:10 Diff · History 0 →Protected edit request on 12 May 2018: the issue, if there is any, is in the sociology banner
2017-12-04 21:24 Diff · History 9 TOC , 4
2017-09-03 12:20 Diff · History 390 :::::::If that's a desired feature, we could easily implement a parameter check like several templates do, and put out an error message when previewing the results. ~~~~
2017-08-30 12:21 Diff · History 567 →Overhaul: moving to Lua &amp; JSON: Not an expert on LUA, but to my understanding how you create specific instance of a banner like {{tl|WP Physics}} should very much look the same as they do now
2017-08-29 00:30 Diff · History 42 →Overhaul: moving to Lua &amp; JSON: and collaboration with other project/bots
2017-08-29 00:29 Diff · History 361 →Overhaul: moving to Lua &amp; JSON: :'''Highest support''' from me. This is a long term project, which will need a lot of testing, but the goals are excellent and desirable. ~~~~
2017-08-16 10:47 Diff · History 0 →And old idea, revisited, part 2: fix
2017-08-16 10:47 Diff · History 458 →And old idea, revisited, part 2: ::::The class mask is a real pain in the ass to setup, and most don't want to bother dealing with that. {{User|Nilhitres}} is working on externalizing the classes to a json file however, it looked real promising from
2017-08-15 22:38 Diff · History 117 →And old idea, revisited, part 2: Reading from the RFC, it seems most people object because no solid criteria for a good list have been put forward.
2017-08-15 22:35 Diff · History 768 →And old idea, revisited, part 2: ::I know for a fact that WP:PHYS would make use of B/C/Start/etc... lists. I suspect most projects would too, were it actually easy to set up. I'm not proposing we extend this systematically and create new reviewi
2017-08-15 14:29 Diff · History -5 →/* And old idea, revisited, part 2*/: fix
2017-08-15 14:29 Diff · History 40 →/* And old idea, revisited, part 2*/: ce
2017-08-15 14:27 Diff · History 1,530 →/* And old idea, revisited, part 2*/: new section
2017-03-08 18:23 Diff · History 265 →And old idea, revisited: Sooo... what's next here? ~~~~
2017-02-21 00:37 Diff · History 376 →And old idea, revisited: ::::::::Must be new. I knew a while ago they systematically purged all FA/GA because they didn't recognized those processes as legit. ~~~~
2017-02-20 00:27 Diff · History 4 →And old idea, revisited: ce
2017-02-20 00:27 Diff · History 439 →And old idea, revisited: :::::As does WP:CHEM, who doesn't recognized FA/GA, many projects who have A-class WP:MILHIST that other projects don't regnognize, and projects with custom classes like B+, AL, BL, etc... ~~~~
2017-02-19 20:04 Diff · History 336 →And old idea, revisited: ::Different projects can and will rate articles differently, so we need a per-project rating. ~~~~
2017-02-15 18:24 Diff · History 313 →And old idea, revisited: ::::::{{Ping|Kaldari|MSGJ}}. How do you feel about the second mockup? ~~~~
2017-02-14 22:44 Diff · History 2 →And old idea, revisited: ce
2017-02-14 22:44 Diff · History 340 →And old idea, revisited: :::::We could also make it so that the project icons are only display if the project is expanded. ~~~~
2017-02-14 22:22 Diff · History 453 →And old idea, revisited: I made a second mockup, which might be more to your liking.
2017-02-14 22:05 Diff · History 384 →And old idea, revisited: ::::I agree that the infobox/etc don't really need to be set at the project level, I put it there mostly because of backwards compatibility. ~~~~
2017-02-14 15:52 Diff · History 3 →And old idea, revisited: {{tl|WPBS}}
2017-02-14 15:48 Diff · History -1 →And old idea, revisited: somehow
2017-02-14 14:59 Diff · History 242 →And old idea, revisited: ::{{User|MSGJ}} What would be required to make that happen, technically? Can the metabanner inherit things from its nested templates somewhat? ~~~~
2017-02-14 14:59 Diff · History 143 →And old idea, revisited: Can the metabanner inherit things from its nested templates somewhat?
2017-02-13 14:31 Diff · History 1 →And old idea, revisited: typo
2017-02-12 14:32 Diff · History 181 →And old idea, revisited: (current icon/general design is a mockup)
2017-02-12 14:10 Diff · History 953 →And old idea, revisited: new section
2009-12-28 14:12 Diff · History 333 →Book namespace created: new section
2009-12-05 21:15 Diff · History 369 →More thoughts on Book-Class: BTW, the namespace discussion is here: Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Namespace for books. Leave comments if you have any. ~~~~
2009-12-04 21:39 Diff · History 441 →More thoughts on Book-Class: re
2009-12-04 00:21 Diff · History 323 →WP religion and book-class: ::::::True, it seems I misread. Oh well, it can always be reverted if it's undesired. ~~~~
2009-12-03 15:25 Diff · History 317 →WP religion and book-class: ::::Well the guy mentionned he wanted to implement them for taskforces as well. ~~~~
2009-12-03 07:58 Diff · History 429 →WP religion and book-class: chinese to me
2009-12-03 05:59 Diff · History 3 →WP religion and book-class: tl
2009-12-03 05:58 Diff · History 480 →WP religion and book-class: new section
2009-10-13 17:40 Diff · History 30 →"FI" class, maybe?: further tweak
2009-10-13 17:40 Diff · History 1,509 →"FI" class, maybe?: re
2009-10-13 15:14 Diff · History 477 →"FI" class, maybe?: :::See Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:Books for example (and Help:Books). [Also this wouldn't encourage the assessing of templates anymore that allowing the importance
2009-10-13 03:24 Diff · History 634 →"FI" class, maybe?: re
2009-10-13 02:43 Diff · History 873 →"FI" class, maybe?: re
2009-10-13 02:29 Diff · History 379 →Further problems with {{tl|Astronomy}}: :::Well there should be a way recognized importance when the custom hooks (whatever hooks are) are used. It's only adding "no" and "bottom". I could write
2009-10-13 02:12 Diff · History 0 →Further problems with {{tl|Astronomy}}: fix the i
2009-10-12 21:37 Diff · History 492 →Further problems with {{tl|Astronomy}}: new section
2009-10-11 17:33 Diff · History 390 →"FI" class, maybe?: ::Personally [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dinoguy1000/Assessment_category_RfC#.5BCategory.2FTemplate.2FImage.2FFile.5D-Class I'm all for it]. ~~~~
2009-09-11 22:04 Diff · History 2 →SMALL_TEXT?: edit window tweak
2009-09-11 22:03 Diff · History 20 →SMALL_TEXT?: 5 columns
2009-09-10 09:25 Diff · History 292 →Class → class: :::::::What about capitalizing "importance" instead? ~~~~
2009-07-26 14:24 Diff · History 32 →Auto=yes is a bit intrusive: tweak
2009-07-26 14:23 Diff · History 472 →Auto=yes is a bit intrusive: shrink it
2009-06-18 01:20 Diff · History 71 →Minor apperance tweak: link
2009-06-18 01:18 Diff · History 1,816 →Minor apperance tweak: new section
2009-06-17 15:07 Diff · History 346 →Another section break (collapsed importance): ::::::::::Exactly. And if new ones show up (such as pink-importance), then you could always implement |pink=yes.~~~~
2009-06-17 13:45 Diff · History 289 →Another section break (collapsed importance): KISS?
2009-06-13 15:54 Diff · History 338 →Can't get the redirect class to work on {{tl|WikiProject Elements}}: :::Ah, I think I found the problem. I've capitalized "/Class" but the template is looking for "/class".~~~~
2009-06-13 15:52 Diff · History 351 →Can't get the redirect class to work on {{tl|WikiProject Elements}}: ::But there is a custom class mask. See {{tl|WikiProject Elements/Class}}, which I copied from {{tl|physics/Class}}.~~~~
2009-06-13 14:27 Diff · History 418 →Can't get the redirect class to work on {{tl|WikiProject Elements}}: new section
2009-06-12 21:11 Diff · History 361 →Another section break (collapsed importance): ::::What would be the alternative solutions? ~~~~
2009-05-29 17:06 Diff · History 348 →Section break (collapsed importance): (unindent) I propose we go forward with what you've said above. Other things (like the icons) can be added later. ~~~~
2009-05-27 08:43 Diff · History 357 →Section break (collapsed importance): re
2009-05-26 23:13 Diff · History 1,141 →Section break (collapsed importance): re
2009-05-26 22:50 Diff · History 3,079 →Section break (collapsed importance): re
2009-05-26 22:04 Diff · History 1 →Section break (collapsed importance): grummar
2009-05-26 22:01 Diff · History 931 →Section break (collapsed importance): re<
2009-05-26 18:16 Diff · History 854 →Section break (collapsed importance): re
2009-05-26 14:17 Diff · History 324 →Displaying the importance in the collapsed version...: :::Anymore feedback on this idea? Should we (well mostly you I suppose) go ahead with it? ~~~~
2009-05-23 07:43 Diff · History 314 →Wikipedia:Bot requests#BannerBOT: new section
2009-05-22 13:13 Diff · History -1 →Displaying the importance in the collapsed version...: fix sig
2009-05-22 13:12 Diff · History 48 →Displaying the importance in the collapsed version...: finish sentence
2009-05-22 13:11 Diff · History 309 →Displaying the importance in the collapsed version...: ::Some minor tweaks (for unassessed class and unknown importance mostly).~~~~
2009-05-21 23:44 Diff · History 998 →Displaying the importance in the collapsed version...: re
2009-05-21 19:58 Diff · History 233 →Displaying the importance in the collapsed version...: sig
2009-05-21 19:44 Diff · History 176 →Displaying the importance in the collapsed version...: expanded to" handle" various situation
2009-05-21 16:17 Diff · History 318 →Displaying the importance in the collapsed version...: ::Alright, see User:Headbomb/Sandbox6 (its crude, but you'll get the idea).~~~~
2009-05-21 15:50 Diff · History 923 →Displaying the importance in the collapsed version...: re
2009-05-21 15:09 Diff · History 504 →Hide importance row on non-articles: re
2009-05-21 04:49 Diff · History 268 →Hide importance row on non-articles: :::::::And disambiguation pages... ~~~~
2009-05-19 21:23 Diff · History 19 →Displaying the importance in the collasped version...: w slashes
2009-05-19 21:22 Diff · History 436 →Displaying the importance in the collasped version...: ::Also as a style issue, I would make place each project name in a {{tl|nowrap}}, so lines either end with slashes or with the final projec
2009-05-19 21:20 Diff · History 344 →Displaying the importance in the collasped version...: : I would go with a bold '''( A-Class, Top-Importance )''', dropping the "rated" to save space. ~~~~
2009-05-15 11:58 Diff · History 577 →Displaying the importance in the collasped version...: comments
2009-05-12 13:14 Diff · History 558 →Displaying the importance in the collasped version...: new section
2009-04-25 19:33 Diff · History 278 →Adding 3 more taskforces to the physics template.: thanks
2009-04-25 19:04 Diff · History 995 →Adding 3 more taskforces to the physics template.: new section
2009-03-03 20:08 Diff · History 610 →Custom messages for class/importance: new section
2009-02-24 08:18 Diff · History 453 →Can't set up categories properly: i think i found what the problem was
2009-02-24 01:18 Diff · History 830 →Can't set up categories properly: new section
All times are in UTC.