Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 13

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 13, 2025.

• Enemies list → Nixon's Enemies List  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Enemies List → Nixon's Enemies List  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

Although Nixon's enemies list was perhaps the most famous, the general concept is much broader than one person. BD2412 T 01:51, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• My first thought was disambiguation, with the current target and Enemy of the people. When searching for others I discovered that we have many comic book lists along the lines of List of Aquaman enemies, List of Batman family enemies, etc, that all seem to be covered at Lists of villains. I'm not sure whether slightly broadening that page or creating a new disambiguation page at this title, Lists of enemies or Enemies lists and linking them as see-alsos would be better? Thryduulf (talk) 02:04, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Thryduulf: I'd wager that moving List of villains to either Lists of enemies and villians or Lists of villains and enemies would be a good call here, given a synonymous relationship between the words "enemy" and "villain" cannot be assumed. Steel1943 (talk) 23:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I could imagine making it a disambiguation but the term as such—"enemies list", not "list of enemies"—is almost always a direct or indirect allusion to Nixon's. (If anyone wants anything from me beyond this one remark, please ping me: I don't maintain a watchlist on en-wiki.) Jmabel | Talk 02:08, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was recently hit up about this on my talk page, and I stand by my original remark. See, for example, https://politicaldictionary.com/words/enemies-list/, https://www.history.com/articles/richard-nixon-enemies-list-who-was-on-it. Question to those who say this term should be treated as more generic: is there any indication of the term being used prior to Nixon? - Jmabel | Talk 17:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. In a good amount of fictional media, the phrase "enemies list" is synonymous with Bestiary. Steel1943 (talk) 22:59, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of villains (or wherever the aforementioned titled redirects to when this discussion is closed). The article may need to be updated to include the current target of the nominated redirect, but either way, the current material of List of villains seems like the appropriate target for this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:07, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Totally meh at this point per the comments following this one. Any other comments I've made in this discussion still apply. Steel1943 (talk) 16:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, given the varied responses without clear target. Personally, my first thought the enemies list TV trope. The first page of Google search results included Enemies List Home Recording, Kash Patel's enemies list (NYT), Trump's enemies list (Independent), Nixon's Enemies List, and Rick Wilson's The Enemies List podcast. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given that the podcast is mentioned in Rick Wilson (political consultant), I now do think that there is sufficient content to disambiguate. I would add Rogues' gallery, if that was expanded to touch on the concept in fiction. BD2412 T 02:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per the however many different definitions of "enemy". it doesn't necessarily mean "villain" or even "antagonist", and definitions can vary based on extremely fickle variables. for an example i'm pretty sure most people would understand, some could consider king dedede an "enemy", but even ignoring how he's friend-shaped (i will hear no arguments to the contrary), his enmity with kirbo (or with anyone else for that matter) has been a matter of perspective or a misunderstanding at best since the second game. i oppose a dab for the same reason, since then "enemy" could just refer to anything in any context that opposes anything under any perspective we can see something in (give or take this caveat, even) for any reason in any way consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Significa liberdade and consarn; this term has myriad possible definitions, there is no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and it's too ambiguous to target any particular article. I suggest that a WP:DAB page is a good idea in the long term, but in the meantime, WP:REDYES and WP:WTAF apply. Carguychris (talk) 14:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. An enemies list is a common subject in fiction and real life (as far back as The Mikado's "As someday it may happen"), and thus a redirect to just one of them is counterproductive. -insert valid name here- (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note I've added the capitalised Enemies List redirect to this discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 22:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Drafted a list of lists at Draft:Lists of enemies and villains to which I propose retargetting both this redirect and Lists of villains. Thryduulf (talk) 22:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I would say that Enemies list and Enemies List are separate concepts from List(s) of enemies. As such, I would disagree with redirecting the first two to the latter. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• @BD2412, Steel1943, Consarn, Carguychris, and -insert valid name here-: Pinging participants to notify the listing of the capitalized Enemies List. Jay 💬 16:21, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  same case, if it needs to be said consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 16:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I have drafted a potential disambiguation page for the specific phrase, "Enemies list", under the current redirect. BD2412 T 17:32, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't understand the separation of "enemies list" and "list of enemies" and consider this dab to be significantly inferior to the one I drafted. Thryduulf (talk) 00:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Thryduulf: There are three things in the encyclopedia specifically titled "Enemies list", with or without internal capitalization. I don't think the podcast is a proper subset of a "list of enemies", because despite its name being derived from that, it is not merely a literal listing of enemies. At the least, in your page the podcast should be in the hatnote rather than the body. Otherwise, a disambiguation page should exist (albeit, possibly at Enemies list (disambiguation), with the current redirects pointing to your list as the primary topic). BD2412 T 00:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @BD2412 I'm not sure I understand your comment (this is probably on me as I feel like I should understand it), could you try rephrasing. Thryduulf (talk) 10:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I mean that we should have separate pages for the concept of a set list of enemies or villains, and for disambiguation of unrelated meanings of the phrase "enemies list". BD2412 T 16:04, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Enemies List per WP:SMALLDIFFERENCES but delete the first one due to unresolveable ambiguity. Cremastra _talk 18:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: any more thoughts on the capitalized version or the dab?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:56, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Equus caballus robustus → Horse  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Similar to #Equus caballus below this is not mentioned in the target article, or indeed anywhere on Wikipedia. There are enough hits on Google that I'm sure this is a real thing, but almost none of them in English and the ones that are I can't access in full but it seems to me to be an ancestor of modern horses (possibly of Przewalski's horse?). Someone looking to Wikipedia to learn about this isn't going to be helped at all, so it would be better as a redlink until we do have content. Thryduulf (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• This was kept when nominated as part of a batch nomination of 48 redirects back in 2015, but other than being noted as a valid species name for a fossil horse it didn't actually get discussed. Thryduulf (talk) 23:06, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Jay 💬 14:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Equus major, per the other synonym below. FunkMonk (talk) 23:12, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the discussion for Equus caballus, but IS E. c. robustus actually a valid synonym? The few publications I can find are either 70 years old or Spanish (country) only, which makes me think that this may be one of these cases where a name stuck regionally after proposal but did not get uptake and/or acceptance in the field at large. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:40, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems I actually meant Equus robustus not E. callabus, the discussion is at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 2#Equus robustus and concluded with consensus to retarget to Equus major. Thryduulf (talk) 08:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Not illuminating re E. c. robustus though, as far as I can see. Common sense suggests that this subspecies name is synonymous to the species name, but are there sources that indicate this? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:47, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment According to StableMade, this appears to be the "Western Diluvium Horse", but StableMade is also far from a reliable source and is also the only mention OF Diluvium Horses in general so I wouldn't trust it User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 04:01, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Clean singing → Screaming (music)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target article. Launchballer 15:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Target mentions "clean vocals" a few times, apparently as an antonym. This could probably be elaborated on (in the lead, for instance). 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is backed up by Clean#Other uses in music with the entry "Clean vocals, a term used for singing to distinguish it from unclean vocals, such as screaming or growling]]. Thryduulf (talk) 17:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Zorbak → AdventureQuest  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at target. Unrelated character is mentioned at Magkasangga 2000, though the article is not consistent as to whether the name is spelt "Zorback" or "Zorbak". 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:33, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is the result of an AfD close, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zorbak - thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:49, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Nightshine → Wonder Woman in other media#Wonder Woman and the Star Riders (1993)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target; search results for this in article are incidental unrelated passing mentions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:12, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While there are no mentions of this fictional character, I would !vote for this redirect to be repurposed and retargeted to S. L. Viehl#The Kyndred for a novel of the same name mentioned there, as a good search term. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:25, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:47, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Israeli–Palestinian conflict solutions → Sinai option  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Sinai option, one of many proposed "Israeli–Palestinian conflict solutions", was created at the redirect title in 2023, and moved recently by @Lionel Messi Lover. Despite the long history, I think this still should not be pointed directly at any one solution, given both the plural and the fact that this elevates this particular proposal (not, I think, a particularly prominent one) above others. I think this should be a disambig page, though if there exists a good overview page that would make a good alterative target as well. Israeli–Palestinian peace process is the closest I've found, but it isn't very well suited in my opinion. Rusalkii (talk) 01:25, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with the entire nomination. The only other option I've found is List of Middle East peace proposals#Israeli–Palestinian peace process but I consider that inferior to Israeli–Palestinian peace process - not only does it mark that as the main article, but it doesn't include the Sinani option, the Jordanian option and probably others too. We also don't have a single category or template that I've found that lists the various proposals. Thryduulf (talk) 01:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is support to retarget to Israeli–Palestinian peace process, and I would have closed this, but what prompted me to relist was the nom's words that this target .. isn't very well suited in my opinion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Friends lesbian kiss episode → Friends season 7#ep166  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Are descriptive episode names like this helpful? I'm genuinely asking. Also, it seems to have been wrongly tagged as being from a merge. — Anonymous 02:03, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I don't doubt someone would see smth like "my favourite episode of friends was the lesbian kiss episode" on socmed and look up something like "Friends lesbain kiss episode" User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 09:48, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, implausible search term, no evidence that this is a name. Let the search results do its thing imo. We don't redirect any "kiss episodes" of any television series, to the episode in question, on Wikipedia of all things, where every redirect requires perennial maintenance. Unhelpful redirect, let's not give the impression that these types of redirects are encouraged or acceptable. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:21, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@user:Yirba did you use this redirect in Wikidata? Because it might be deleted. Anthony2106 (talk) 05:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Leaning keep. Accurate, harmless, I could see a reader looking up an episode centered on a moment iconic for the series in this way. BD2412 T 02:52, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: Per the discussion below, I would also have no objection to retargeting to Lesbian kiss episode#Friends. BD2412 T 20:35, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Based on searches, this actually seems to be ambiguous with The One With the Lesbian Wedding. Since we can't be for sure which episode the reader is looking for, I think this redirect isn't useful. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Presidentman. LarryL33k (Contribz) 00:34, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete bordering on uninterpretability. The way this is structured does not imply that it is an episode of "Friends", rather, it is some episode of something where some friends have a lesbian kiss. Which I construe could be an episode of Roseanne, that the U.S. Congress launched congressional investigations about. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 22:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Seems like a plausible search term, and an episode like this airing in 2001 is noteworthy. Also as far as I can tell, "The One With the Lesbian Wedding" episode didn't actually show a kiss. Correct me if I'm wrong Presidentman. Anne drew · talk · contribs · 15:32, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I haven't seen either episode so can't say for sure if there was no kiss. However, if you google "Friends lesbian kiss episode," information on both episodes pops up. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  From the "The One With the Lesbian Wedding" article:

A writer with the Associated Press noted in an article that week that the ceremony would not include a kiss by the newlyweds, including the episode as part of an observed trend of portrayals of gay characters while skirting controversy by avoiding or minimizing physical contact.

And a clip I found of the ceremony on youtube does not have a kiss. Anne drew · talk · contribs · 17:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: our article lesbian kiss episode lists "The One With Rachel's Big Kiss" (and not "The One With the Lesbian Wedding") as the Friends lesbian kiss episode. "The One With the Lesbian Wedding" does not seem to be a lesbian kiss episode: most obviously it apparently did not actually involve a kiss, but it also was not aired during a sweeps period, it did not involve a presumed heterosexual regular character, and the lesbian relationship wasn't solely for that episode. By contrast "The One With Rachel's Big Kiss" did have a lesbian kiss, did air during a sweeps period, involved an otherwise-heterosexual recurring character whose heterosexuality was reaffirmed by the end of the episode, and the lesbian character was solely introduced for that episode. It seems to me that "The One With Rachel's Big Kiss" is clearly what "Friends lesbian kiss episode" refers to; the question is whether or not this kind of redirect is useful. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Plausible search term per Anne and unambiguous per Caeciliusinhorto. First choice retarget to Lesbian kiss episode#Friends (where I added this anchor and linked the episode) because of the subgenre context, second choice keep. Jay 💬 15:17, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Support this. it's lio! | talk | work 09:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Lesbian kiss episode#Friends per Jay. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:04, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: for fuller consideration of the retargetting suggestion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 13:04, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I previously closed this RFD as delete. However, on another review, I am choosing to reopen given the lack of consensus. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Lesbian kiss episode#Friends or weak delete per all the above. I oppose "keep" since the redirect is not the name of the episode. Steel1943 (talk) 21:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting a final time since this was closed and reopened.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Poor people's rights → Equality  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I am not sure if we have a page that this is a natural fit for, but the "Equality" disambig page certainly isn't it. I can imagine a redirect to Economic inequality, as at least much more on topic? But that isn't really talking about rights at all, just the general existence of economic inequality. There's an ACLU handbook of poor people's rights, which isn't mentioned anywhere on wiki. I think the most common use of this phrase is for various social safety net programs? Rusalkii (talk) 23:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The current target is definitely wrong. I'm wondering whether a set index would be the right fit here? A couple of minutes searching finds Poor People's Alliance, Poor People's Economic Human Rights Campaign, Poor People's Campaign, Poor People's Movements, Poor People's Campaign: A National Call for a Moral Revival and English Poor Laws which all seem to deal with some aspect of this search term, and I strongly suspect there are more. Thryduulf (talk) 00:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Per a suggestion of @Thryduulf at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#Navigation pages, I agree that it could be fit to be a navigation page, which would match better than either a set index or redirect. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 10:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+1 on the {{navigation page}} conversion. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Anti-electoralism → Election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Criticisms of electoralism → Election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Criticisms of electoral politics → Election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The target doesn't seem to give the reader information about what the titles of these redirects are suggesting. The section Undemocratic contains information about problematic elections in some countries, but not about criticism of (nor sentiment against) the very concept of elections themselves, so retargeting the redirects there may not make them helpful. Anti-electoralism and Criticisms of electoralism could also be retargeted to Electoralism, but that article doesn't say anything about the opposite sentiment nor how "electoralism" has been criticized either, so I suggest deleting all three of them if no better targets can be found. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history of Criticisms of electoral politics?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore Criticisms of electoral politics without prejudice to merge tagging / AfD. Jay 💬 11:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra _talk 18:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore Criticisms of electoral politics and redirect the others there because that's best option. If that's not allowed, then redirect all to Criticism of democracy. EchoVanguardZ (talk) 19:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Assume the good-faith assumption of assuming the assumption of good faith was in good faith → Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Wikipedia:AGFAAAGFGF → Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This does not seem to be pertinent to the target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, humor is allowed in wikispace but at this point it just gets nonsensical. Even back in 2009 when this was created it wasn't mentioned at the target. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 18:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as creator; in use in two essays at Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:Assume_th.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Those are both in "See Also" sections. They can just be removed, and in fact probably will be removed automatically should this RFD close as delete. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 19:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Wikipedia:Assume the good-faith assumption of assuming the assumption of good faith was in good faith as one of those super-rare occasions where ... seriously? The redirect is odd/humorous, the target is marked numerous, and ... unless the redirect is somehow determined to be ambiguous, I'm not seeing an issue here. However, with that being said, weak delete Wikipedia:AGFAAAGFGF since using shortcuts to humorous targets may not be the best utilization of a shortcut. Steel1943 (talk) 19:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Vanguard Entertainment → Plaion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target page. IceWelder [✉] 16:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Kkaydes → Hip-hop  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Newly created redirect from a person's name to a general genre of music whose article does not mention this person to provide any context for why he would redirect there. There's an improperly referenced draft about the same person at Draft:Kkaydes, which wouldn't be the least bit approvable in an WP:AFC review in its current state, so this was clearly created as a semi-advertorialized attempt to "get" the person into Wikipedia prematurely -- but he's not entitled to have his name be a redirect to a general overview article about a genre of music, in which he isn't mentioned at all, in advance of passing WP:NMUSIC to qualify for his own BLP. Bearcat (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the same reason we would not redirect Michael Jordan, assuming he did not have an article, to Basketball. Steel1943 (talk) 23:36, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's not a good sign if the artist in question is uploading his own music to genius User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 08:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Maulana Saifullah Muhammadi (Islamic scholar) → Sufi Muhammad  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This should be deleted as Maulana Saifullah Muhammadi is nowhere close to be redirected to Sufi Muhammad. It was created by a sockpuppet. Al-Waqīmī (talk) 15:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Falsterbo Horse Show → Skanör med Falsterbo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This should either be an article, or the contents of Category:Falsterbo Horse Show should be deleted. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep/Dabify – There are three appropriate options: 1) make an article, 2) dabify it to the three existing year articles of the show, or 3) keep target to the community. #2 seems to be the easiest route as three year–based articles exist.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Estadio Banorte light rail station → Estadio Azteca light rail station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Implausible redirect since Mexico City stations are not sponsored. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 00:42, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: The station itself isn't sponsored, but it serves the stadium which is sometimes referred to by the sponsored name, and hence this would seem to be a perfectly plausible search. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:16, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• QVC East → QVC  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of this at the target, and even web search results seem to be generally unrelated. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This was originally a replacement for a piped link [[QVC|QVC East]] but the reference to QVC East seems to have been removed since then, so I agree this redirect serves no purpose now. Colonies Chris (talk) 17:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• William H. Mount → Carl Sagan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

A person by this name does not seem to be described anywhere in our articles. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Hungarian Horntail → Magical creatures in Harry Potter#Hungarian Horntail  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

delete, there isn't anything about a Hungarian Horntail in the target article. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the name IS listed in the target article and contextualised in a list [of names of types of dragons in the harry potter series. The "breed" is named is used in extremely popular books and films, so it is a 'notable' name that has no other plausible meanings to confuse the potential target destination. The article has received low - but very consistent - pageviews for the last 5 years (with spikes of viewerships in earlier years, presumably coenciding with mainstream media attention). Wittylama 13:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Agree with Wittylama above. — Tonymec (talk) 06:40, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• CAR → Central African Republic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

CAR has many other uses (see Car (disambiguation) and I'm not convinced that Central African Republic is the clear primary topic. I think it makes more sense to retarget to Car (disambiguation). 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 (talk) 11:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep By far the primary topic for the acronym "CAR". –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The disambiguation page is not in the top 20 destinations from the target article in the March clickstream data [1]. Thryduulf (talk) 16:22, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Car. Whenever it is vehicle or not, "Car" is most likely a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT for uppercase "CAR". Weak keep for maintain current redirect. 2404:8000:1037:587:A0D0:7D92:BD86:BC7B (talk) 09:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Central African Republic already has a hatnote ""CAR" redirects here. For other uses, see Car (disambiguation)" and Car (disambiguation) already has a header that says "Car, Cars, CAR or CARS may also refer to...". Spelling CAR in capital letters and, as per LaundryPizza03 - the country is the most sensible (and important) destination for the redirect. I disagree with retargeting to Car as the choice to spell in capital-letters is a clear intent to mean something different from the motorvehicle. Wittylama 13:27, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Car (disambiguation) given the several topics at the aforementioned disambiguation page that utilize this acronym. Steel1943 (talk) 19:42, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  But the African country is, as noted, by far the primary topic for the acronym. Thryduulf (talk) 10:14, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• REtarget to the disambiguation page; per the nom -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 06:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cindyana Santangelo → Ritual de lo Habitual  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The subject's page redirects to an album where the subject speaks only one word. Does not pass WP:GNG WWGB (talk) 01:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - This is the best (and probably only) target for this person. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  (edited) She does not need a target as she is not notable. No place in Wikipedia. WWGB (talk) 08:13, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Exactly, "She does need need a target". --Jax 0677 (talk) 09:15, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @WWGB I think you meant "she does not need a target". Plant🌱man (talk) 09:20, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - My concerns at Deaths in 2024 were that the redirect leads to an article about a music album for which her only contribution was "spoken word" on one track, "Stop!". Other than that, IMDB would supposedly expand on her showbusiness contributions, but represents a source not useable in Wikipedia in terms of reliability. Not notable by a long chalk. By the way, "targets for persons" should only relate to truly notable people - none of us automatically deserves such a thing. Redirect should therefore be removed. Ref ^(chew)(do) 08:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – notability does not apply to redirects, only to the question of whether a subject should have a standalone article. In fact, redirects from notable subjects are sometimes deleted precisely because they're notable. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. Most of her obituaries mention her acting roles instead of Jane's Addiction, so I think this could be a little WP:ASTONISH, but those acting roles were very minor and don't really merit being mentioned on here, so given that this is probably the only target the redirect is fine. Nohomersryan (talk) 18:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget (with soft redirect) to Wikidata Cindyana Santangelo (Q133734495) as it's non-notable for Wikipedia. fgnievinski (talk) 00:45, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would gladly support this retarget, given the rules on redirect notability criteria (none). Ref ^(chew)(do) 07:11, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly oppose this option. Redirects that include a Wikidata property number are frequently deleted on Wikipedia (example: "Foo (Q123456)" to "Foo"), and doing this is such an unlikely cross-project redirect that it is definitely not what readers are looking for if they are currently on Wikipedia. Steel1943 (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Aussiedoodle → Dog crossbreed  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No content in enwiki articles apart from passing mentions; Wiktionary has wikt:Aussiedoodle, though. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of an AfD where redirect was instituted as an atd. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minor dog crossbreeds Traumnovelle (talk) 07:23, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:22, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 3D SRAM → Static random-access memory  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• 3D DRAM → Dynamic random-access memory  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

Target article doesn't mention 3D anything. Rusalkii (talk) 20:32, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note I've added 3D DRAM to this discussion, as that redirects target also makes no mention of 3D anything. Either both should be kept (ideally with a mention added), both should be deleted or both should be retargetted to where they are mentioned. Thryduulf (talk) 00:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Three-dimensional integrated circuit § 3D SiCs has something on 3D DRAM. Jay 💬 16:16, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, mwwv ^converse∫_edits 16:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Tawnia → Neopets  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target; this is also a first name, though we only seem to have an article about Tawnia McKiernan (and a redirect for Tawnia Baker, a fictional character). 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:04, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• No earthly idea why this RfD was under article alerts for WikiProject:Classical Greece and Rome. Unless because it's categorized as a "winged unicorn", and maybe that's a subcategory for Pegasus? P Aculeius (talk) 13:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Apparently because being categorised as a "winged unicorn" makes people apply a WikiProject banner for "Classical Greece and Rome" to the talk page. See Special:Diff/1283891996 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:18, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No mention at target article. No particular reason to believe that the neopets character is the most likely target for someone searching this. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 18:51, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 04:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Setindexify there are two people and characters with the name "Tawnia" with coverage on Wikipedia; including Tawnia Cannell McKiernan, and, Tawnia Baker listed at List of The A-Team characters; if someone puts data on the Neopet toy to that article, there can be 3 -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 06:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Big Primid → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Boom Primid → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Fire Primid → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Metal Primid → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Scope Primid → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Sword Primid → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

Target mentions "primid", but not any of these in particular, and the only other occurrence of "primid" in our articles is at Ems-Chemie, so these have no coverage and are therefore unhelpful redirects. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Smash Bros Brwal → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely typo that inhibits search (Special:Search/brwal returns this as a search result instead of attempting to use the search engine's built-in typo correction). 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Enix150 (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google says it all - despite being unlikely imo, this exact typo is STILL used enough for there to be multiple google pages EVEN EXCLUDING WIKIPEDIA TOOLS (which is all that matters for typo redirects), so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 03:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have pointed out how this typo redirect would inhibit searches for other, potentially more popular, topics when entered with the same typo. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• weak delete. while i normally support deletion of tpyos from the third word on (or after too many characters, which this probably isn't), it's relatively likely that someone would type that before getting to the part of the title that isn't the same as the other games (nailed the wording!). still, i believe typo correction functions would have them covered regardless, if not outright stopping at the second b consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• FWIW, I should probably have nominated Super Smash Bros. Brwal along with this as well. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Audi famam illius → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Great Aether → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Towtow → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Trowlon → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Roturret → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Nagagog → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Gamyga → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Feyesh → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Cymul → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Buckot → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Bucculus → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Autolance → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Armight → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Armank → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Poppant → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Shaydas → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Borboras → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

None of these have are mentioned at the target nor occur in any other of our articles (apart from arguably the last two, where "Shayda" and "Borbora" have some content, but that is unlikely to ever be pluralised). 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as gamecruft, mostly enemies in the Subspace Emissary according to SSB Wiki. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• TheFloow → Flo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Floow → Super Smash Bros. Brawl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unclear what this is for, but we do not seem to have any content on this. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. According to The Super Smash Bros. wiki A Floow (フロウス, Flows) is an enemy in Super Smash Bros. Brawl's Adventure Mode: The Subspace Emissary [2] Our content on that "mode" is at Super Smash Bros. Brawl#Adventure Mode: The Subspace Emissary but it doesn't mention "Floow" at all. There are 2 lists that mention "The Floow Limited" (Prince Michael International Road Safety Award#Notable winners and Fosun International#Technology) but both relate to a company that was deemed non-notable in 2019 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Floow Limited (I have not specifically looked at whether that has changed, but what I saw on google when searching for "Floow" did not immediately suggest notability). Thryduulf (talk) 08:48, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The Highwind → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target; the only potentially relevant entry at the Highwind disambiguation page is the airship, which is, however, no longer mentioned at the linked article. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:52, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Layla (Final Fantasy) → Final Fantasy II#Story  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Layla (Final Fantasy II) → Final Fantasy II#Story  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Morpher (Final Fantasy) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Does not appear to be covered in any of our articles. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Four Fiends → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Monsters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Currently the only mention of "fiends" at the target is the hatnote for this redirect, which points at Four Perils. While articles like Final_Fantasy_(video_game)#Story mention the fictional element, the mythological use is potentially the primary topic. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Firaga → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Magic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. The only other two search results for this on-wiki, Utopia Records and Varien, are not really suitable alternatives. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Gigantaur → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Monsters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at target, though there is a sentence on an unrelated band at Sea_Stories_(band)#1994-present:_Post_break_up. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't keep (no opinion on whether to delete or retarget). The Final Fantasy creature is called a "Gigantuar" (the u and a are switched). "Gigantaur" spelled that way is a World of Warcraft character, or possibly a misspelling of Gigantor. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 (talk) 10:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• delete as an implausible anything juggled between like 50 quadrillion targets per beefaloe. i'm pretty sure even monster hunter has a gigantaur consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 20:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Stilva → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Monsters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at target. Unrelated character is described at Getter_Robo_Armageddon#Other. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Phoenix Down → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Phoenix down → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Fenix Down → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Pheonix down → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Pheonix Down → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

Not mentioned at target. Minimal information exists at Final_Fantasy_VI#Localization; there is also a band named after the item, which is mentioned at Kane_Roberts#Career, as well as Phoenix Down (The Unguided song). As for the last two, I am not sure the misspelling is likely enough to warrant a redirect independent of the outcome for the other three. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I have added a section in the article referencing them, and they could be further refined to point to the section. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• No opinion I was invited to this discussion by some entity - human or bot - that was under the impression that I had some interest in this topic/discussion, which I apparently do not, as I do not show up in the history of any of these pages. While I do appreciate being advised of anything I might be interested or involved in, it might help people if it told what specific page or issue triggered someone's involvement. I mean, where I have interest or involvement with something I do appreciate a warning, but, to put it bluntly, I don't know what the hell I did to be honored with the privilege of this invite. Thank you for reading.
  
  "Understanding of things by me is only made possible by viewers (of my comments) like you."
  
  Thank you.
  Paul Robinson Rfc1394 (talk) 17:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Geomancer (Final Fantasy) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Classes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not described at target, and does not look like we have any alternative to offer our readers. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ancient (Final Fantasy VII) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Ancients (Final Fantasy VII) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not described at target, and I do not immediately see any suitable alternative. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Samurai (Final Fantasy) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Classes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Ninja (Final Fantasy) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Classes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not described at target. Somebody familiar with the franchise might know where to look for an alternative, but Special:Search/"samurai" "final fantasy" and Special:Search/"ninja" "final fantasy" give too many – generally incidental – results to be of any use. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Omega Weapon → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Monsters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. On-wiki search gives some related results, as well as unrelated ones, in particular List of Henry Danger episodes. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an evidently generic term not mentioned at target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Time/Space Mage → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Classes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target; while I retargeted Time Mage to Final Fantasy V#Job System, "space mage" does not seem to be mentioned anywhere. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:57, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ultima (spell) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Magic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Ultima (Final Fantasy) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Magic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Ultima Weapon → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Monsters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Final fantasy ultima → DigiCube#Ultimania  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at target. Special:Search/"ultima" "final fantasy" has some relevant mentions; not sure whether any of them is a suitable alternative. The last one was apparently originally about the same as the other three, and I am not fully sure it is pertinent, but Ultimania points at a different article so it should probably be consistent with either that or the three mentioned above. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Boko (Final Fantasy) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Boko  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Boco (Final Fantasy) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Boko  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at target. Special:Search/"boko" "final fantasy" has some relevant mentions; not sure whether any of them is a suitable alternative. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to Chocobo since this redirect can refer to this target, but in universe, "Boko" is a unique named Chocobo character. Steel1943 (talk) 01:15, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Flan Princess → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Monsters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Atma Weapon → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Monsters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Fire2 → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Magic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

We do not appear to have content on these anywhere to provide to our readers. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:40, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ramuh → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Summoning Magic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Ramuh (Final Fantasy) → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series#Summoning Magic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. On-wiki search does return a bunch of mentions in articles related to Final Fantasy, though whether this should be retargeted (and if yes, to which of the articles) should probably be left to someone familiar with the franchise. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The articles that mention "Ramuh" which are not associated with Final Fantasy are Adaptations of Little Red Riding Hood and Disco Fries. Steel1943 (talk) 01:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Esuna → Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at target. The_7th_Saga#Characters seems to have an unrelated character with this name. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Sparkle Pants → Edward Cullen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Sparklepants → Edward Cullen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at target, on-wiki search results are unrelated passing uses, and web search returns fashion-related results. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Pointless.★Trekker (talk) 15:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Moontube → Niconico  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention anywhere on the English Wikipedia. Created with the edit summary Internet nickname for the site but a web search seems to bring up unrelated results. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:25, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is anecdotal and probably not admissible as grounds for keeping the redirect, but the logic behind this nickname stems from Japanese being called moonrunes in some internet communities, thus the Japanese equivalent to YouTube being called Moontube. _dk (talk) 00:47, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment this comes from Japan being the "moon", where they use "moonspeak", and Niconico being Japanese equivalent of YouTube -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 07:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I would think this should more likely refer to a lunar lava tube -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 07:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]