Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 September 25

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:49, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Susan Ee → Angelfall  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Author redirects to a work are of little value; inhibit the creation of the author article, so any link would be better to be a redlink until someone can create a suitable article. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:19, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• keep as redirect. Reader is better served by a rd to one of her works than by a red link or the unsourced dead-end blp stub I found while stub-sorting. Rd can be overwritten in future by anyone prepared to create a useful sourced stub. PamD 06:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is her only Wikipedia-notable work so far. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - The author is strongly identified with this one work in particular, and I also feel inclined to keep this as is. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 11:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• B-Sides (Digital download EP's) → Duffy (singer)  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This is not something you usually create an article for, and it's at an implausible title. nyuszika7h (talk) 10:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep; this has a separate page history. RFD isn't for getting rid of significant page history. Nyttend (talk) 11:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not mentioned at target. Steel1943 (talk) 13:44, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not at Duffy's article, not a title of an album of Duffy's. Digital download EP's are not a notable section on the A-side and B-side article. There is already B-Side (EP) by another artist named Baiyu. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Enrico Teodorani → Djustine  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

A redirect from an Italian comic book writer to a single work of his. A redlink would be preferable. However, he doesn't even have an Italian Wikipedia article, so the resulting redlinks should probably be delinked too. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep as the comic book is more notable than its author. But Is Djustine a notable work? That doesn't even have an Italian Wikipedia article, so if it gets AFD'ed then the author redirect would be deleted as well. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • What justification is there for redirecting to this article and not Calavera (comics)? Or Femforce? I probably should have mentioned there are multiple possible targets. —Xezbeth (talk) 20:27, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Loosing feeling → Losing Feeling  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

unnecessary Little Professor (talk) 01:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep; this is the original title of the page, and it's been around for seven years. Don't create linkrot. Nyttend (talk) 02:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete - This is a typo that involves two mistakes, repeating a word and also forgetting a capitalization, but it seems like something that multiple readers may do. I'm not too sure. I feel a bit like keeping it, but I also think that it isn't particularly helpful either. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – The article was only at this title for two months, and another month at Losing feeling. I doubt there are any significant external links to it that haven't been fixed yet. nyuszika7h (talk) 10:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Orphaned, thus useless. SSTflyer 11:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Headscratch I'm wondering if the lowercase variant might not very vaguely refer to things like Apathy or Social-emotional agnosia or Tactile agnosia. Uanfala (talk) 17:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The properly capitalised and appropriately spelt loosing can also refer to "relaxing" (in the same sense that laxatives are relaxing), but I'm not sure the combination with feeling could get the phrase very far. Uanfala (talk) 19:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Typo + capitalization difference = too unlikely and thus possibly harmful. Steel1943 (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Typing in "Loosing" gives "loosing religion" and "loosing feeilng". This isn't a common enough typo for this album title, unless news articles disagree. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.