Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rlab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ✗plicit 23:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rlab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No references Imcdc (talk) 13:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 13:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 13:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I was the original author of the article in 2004. I don't remember writing it, and have no objection to the deletion. The program was mentioned to me as a free alternative to MATLAB by a university lecturer, and I got the wrong impression that it was syntax-compatible. When I realised it was not, I quickly lost interest. It may have been well known in 2004-5, but it hasn't been developed since and I'm not interested in doing the research to establish if it was notable at the time.-gadfium 17:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.