Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purefoods Corned Beef
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Purefoods Corned Beef (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
All the sources I found and in the article is a bunch of passing mention. No significant coverage on the sources listed on the article and even on the web. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:23, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Philippines. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:23, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- wat is passing mention Webster guy (talk) 11:29, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Webster guy: WP:PASSINGMENTION or Trivial Mention means sources only mention the subject briefly Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:08, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- But they fully talk abotu ti check again lol Webster guy (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Source 1: One Sentence mention
- Source 2: Listings, not even a sentence Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:46, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- But they fully talk abotu ti check again lol Webster guy (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Per criteria G3. Looks like a case of disruptive editing/vandalism (first edit for the page has the comment "yeah im gonna die" ?). Given the author's user page (april fools day tag for user page edited on April 17. . .) and the general style of writing this article + account seems to have been created to waste other editors' time.
- @Webster guy: WP:PASSINGMENTION or Trivial Mention means sources only mention the subject briefly Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:08, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 13:30, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't believe G3 applies to the current state of the article. While the edit summary in that revision states "yeah im gonna die," this alone doesn't constitute vandalism or a blatant hoax, which are the criteria required for a G3 speedy deletion. The content added in that revision does not appear to be false or intentionally disruptive, just a ton of typos and grammar issues.
- Also, the state of their user page shouldn't affect the judgment of this article. We're here to assess whether the subject is notable based on the article itself, not based on anything related to their user page. AstrooKai (Talk) 11:11, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:PRODUCT. While a popular product in the Philippines, it lacks WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources. AstrooKai (Talk) 11:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)