Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anglers Park, Florida

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anglers Park, Florida

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable unincorporated neighborhood of Key Largo, Florida. Fails both WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG, as no reliable sources exist. Google maps. Curbon7 (talk) 09:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 09:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 09:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If reception is well, then I'll likely bundle nom these by county going forward (separating the marginal ones for singular discussion, of course). Curbon7 (talk) 09:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Neighborhood/subdivision without notability. It is and has since at least 2000 been within the Key Largo CDP so I don't know why the article incorrectly says it's to the northeast of it, not that it makes a difference. Reywas92^Talk 16:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete I'm generally in favor of keeping articles on unincorporated places, but only if there is sufficient information available on them to establish some level of notability. Searching for this neighborhood only brings up hotel and real estate websites. If sources can be added to demonstrate notability, I would change my vote. As it stands, there's not enough to support the article's existence. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:25, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of this is about the person the subdivision was constructed for. Other than a short statement that a rail switch was added to make shipping construction supplies easier, and passing mentions such as this, I'm mostly finding real estate listings and old newspaper advertisements selling lots/investment shares in the subdivision. I don't think the coverage is enough for notability, despite the subdivision going back to the 1920s. So delete. As a caution to the nominator, from what I've seen, only bundled ones of highly similar uncontroversial articles go over well, and even then I wouldn't recommend over 8 or 10 at a time to avoid WP:TRAINWRECK concerns. Hog Farm _Talk 23:39, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Hog Farm, duly noted, will likely just do them one by one in that case. Curbon7 (talk) 02:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Speedy delete Couldn't all of these be CSD? I think the key point is that not even GNIS is used for the lone source. It's some self-published source. – The Grid (talk) 02:11, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I wish to assume good faith on the editor who created the article but digging through their article creation history leads me to similar questionable articles. If you want to group items, Curbon7 - you probably could start here. – The Grid (talk) 13:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - The Grid, after some great advice from Hog Farm, the way I decided to go about it is to just PROD the simply non-controversial articles like this one, and bring to AfD the one's that are more uncertain. This one was mainly a test run to see how much appetite there was. Curbon7 (talk) 13:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As this clipping explains, Anglers Park is nothing more than a subdivision within Key Largo, Florida. No evidence that this meets GEOLAND or GNG.

There is no source that describes this as an "unincorporated community". –dlthewave ☎ 02:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.