Select Page

User talk:Toast1454

3This user talk page has been vandalised 3 times.



Welcome!

Hello, Toast1454, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Rain World. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TheWikiToby (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Information icon Hi Toast1454! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Rain World that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. TheWikiToby (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

rain world

rain world

coding and stuff here. unless you use visual editor -chaotic-thing- (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UAA

Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example, the German wiki is another. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 11:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, my bad. Toast1454 (talk) 12:25, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Toast1454. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
  • Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 16:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 180.150.55.167 (talk) 22:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC) why did you revert the change[reply]

Your two edits that I have reverted do not conform to Wikipedia's editing guidelines. You can find them here. Please take some time to read and familiarize yourself with them.
Specifically, your edits are non-encyclopedic and do not fit the formal tone of Wikipedia. Toast1454TC 23:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits also appear to be personal opinions, which is against Wikipedia guidelines. Toast1454TC 23:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Re this blind revert to Tofu-dreg project, which added back unsourced material to the article, and the subsequent incorrect warning you left on my talk page.

It is one of Wikipedia's strongest policies that all additions of information must include a citation, especially when they accuse people of a crime. You should know this by now.

My edit removing the accusation had an edit summary that you ignored in your hurry to revert using automated tools. Misuse of automated tools in this way can lead to editors having them removed.

Please slow down and be more careful in future. And also revert you addition of unsourced accusations to the article. Thanks. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Friendly fire! No hard feelings, from one vandalism fighter to another. — ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks toast

I am very grateful that you changed the page and gave criticism so I’ll say again thanks Mediolgy (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warning users for editing the sandbox

Warning for this isn't necessary, as a bot will reinsert the header. CutlassCiera 18:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]