User talk:PresN

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 20 August 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 14:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thak you today for the article, introduced: "Outer Wilds is a game that's hard to explain: not because it's complex, but because the less you know going into it, the more you'll get out of it. All you ever have in the game is what's in your head, so I'm doing you a disservice by nominating this if you ever plan on playing it. But I'm doing it anyway, because for a subset of people (myself included), Outer Wilds is the best experience they've ever had with a video game, and I wanted to share that in an article. It's a GA and polished and ready for review and this isn't my first (or 20th) rodeo at FAC and all that, but really I just wanted people who go cared enough to go looking to know that in 2012 Alex Beachum made a sketch of a game about roasting campfire marshmallows while the sun explodes, and a little over seven years later what it became won the video game BAFTA for game of the year without losing that heart."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
• Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
• AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of myosoricines, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Giants2008 (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of soricines, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

• Elli
• HouseBlaster
• Pickersgill-Cunliffe

• Brianga
• De728631
• Georgewilliamherbert
• Hyacinth (deceased)
• ProveIt
• The Night Watch

Technical news

• Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)

Miscellaneous

• The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more

Is this ready to be archived? Sorry new to this process Template:48JCLsignature 15:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@48JCL: The delegates will close the nomination when we get to it and feel it has reached consensus. It may take some time, so please be patient. --PresN 16:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Template:48JCLsignature 14:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Laika: Aged Through Blood you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 00:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Laika: Aged Through Blood you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Laika: Aged Through Blood and Talk:Laika: Aged Through Blood/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 13:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Laika: Aged Through Blood you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Laika: Aged Through Blood for comments about the article, and Talk:Laika: Aged Through Blood/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 14:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of eulipotyphlans, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I was looking around a Chinese game exhibition through twitter and a photographer took a picture from a Mega Man X statue large here. As I found the image well done, I tried contacting such persona and upon telling what it would be awesome if we could use it in the franchise article or the title character article, he kinda gave me permission. Is there a proper procedure to uploading a free image? The only one I even uploaded was the one of voice actress Megumi Ogata but with help from a user. When talking with the user, he suggested this but then showed me the statue images himself. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Well, it'd be [1] for free images; looks like under Chinese law Freedom of panorama applies to statues (it doesn't in the US), so photos of a copyrighted statue displayed in public are free use, so you should be able to just follow the wizard. The problem here is- where is the proof that the photographer has released the photograph itself into the public domain? It needs to be either publicly viewable, or they have to submit it in an email, and they have to be explicit about what the new license is, not just "yeah it's fine to use on Wikipedia" - see Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission. --PresN 21:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see. That sure is long but it means I can upload it myself so that the other user is not forced to create an account and instead just send an email providing his approval right? Tintor2 (talk) 22:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Yeah, they use [[2]] to fill out the permissions form. --PresN 12:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I started creating an article for 9S from Nier: Automata here after seeing several notable third party sources that heavily discuss them. I would be bold and create it but I'm kinda missing creation sources other than Yoko Taro commenting on how he created his portrayal in the endings. By any chance did you see anything? I find the reception strong enough to pass notability guidelines since almost every source primarily focuses on the duo, recognition of best spoiler and character by reliable sources and scholars with published articles that have been cited several times. CheersTintor2 (talk) 15:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: I haven't; maybe ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Video game characters? --PresN 16:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created the article. Thankfully I found information about the voice actors and some commentaries from the staff members even if it is not as big as 2B's article. Searching in Japanese was kinda easier since 9S is not written in Japanese characters so I googled Yoko Taro in Japanese alongside 9S. Tintor2 (talk) 03:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

Administrator changes

Isabelle Belato

• Ian.thomson
• Modussiccandi

Interface administrator changes

Izno

CheckUser changes

Barkeep49

Technical news

• Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
• Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ

Hey :) I'm the researcher who rebuilt The Sumerian Game. I saw you worked a lot on that article and recently added my project. Just in case you would like to check, I just released the preview of my upcoming book about the process of rebuilding the Sumerian Game: the sources, the game logic, the slides and much more. I researched in depth the 2 known versions of The Sumerian Game and how the gameplay changed from version to version, and then from The Sumerian Game to Hamurabi, going through King of Sumeria. According to my research, David Ahl's addition to King of Sumeria (the perpormance calculations at the end of the game) aren't his own. Xend3r76 (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Xend3r76: I look forward to it! --PresN 20:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Released :) Xend3r76 (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pokémate, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I thought I remembered you posting a few months ago about mobilizing people to reduce the number of video game stub articles, so I found your post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 174#Goals update. I have been wondering if there is a centralized place to list stub articles with greater potential, such that we know the sources exist if someone is willing and interested in expanding the article into a start or better? If there is no such place, would there be an interest in starting one, like maybe as a task force page focused on this specific goal? I for one would be super extra happy to start forming such a list, checking to see which games have sources listed on their talk page that need to be implemented, or reviews listed on trusted external sites, or that the sources are already in the article but it just needs to be expanded. I think it would help to identify as many such articles as possible so that anyone interested in reducing the amount of stub articles could have a direction to focus on. :) BOZ (talk) 20:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BOZ: Seems like a question for the WTVG talk page, really, but if there's interest I don't see any issue with starting a page. That said, I would think pretty much every stub out there should theoretically have enough sources to be improved to a Start at least, just that no one has done it yet. --PresN 21:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right, theoretically they should, but I'm talking about ones where we know for a fact the sources are out there, especially if we can view the sources online. Sort of like, anyone looking to build up a stub could look over this list of the top 10% or 20% that could easily be built up using sources that other people found but did not use (or use much). BOZ (talk) 21:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dorfromantik you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 10:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dorfromantik you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dorfromantik and Talk:Dorfromantik/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 15:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
• Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and
• BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dorfromantik you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dorfromantik for comments about the article, and Talk:Dorfromantik/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

Pppery

Interface administrator changes

Pppery

Oversighter changes

Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

• Courcelles
• GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
• Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
• The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.

Miscellaneous

• Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of hipposiderids, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just looking up and noticed that List of Atari, Inc. games (1993–present) was redirected by you to the SA article. However just like you said in the summary, I definitely agree that a proper, clean split should be done into a 'List of Infogrames/GT Interactive' and 'Atari', - due to how confusing it is and how it blends the lines - and I'm willing to make it.

I ask you to come and read Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#About Atari, something I posted today to clean up the confusing mess of Atari-related articles. I think as part of that, the list of SA games also need a split - especially now with the comeback of the Infogrames brand as a publisher. Sceeegt (talk) 21:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve asked Hey man im josh about this, but figured I’d get your input as well.

On the note of the GMs FL nomination, and the 8-10 entry standard - the seasons list is at seven entries, with season eight about to begin. Would I stand a chance if I improved/nominated it for FL in the near-future, or should I just wait until the end of the upcoming season? The Kip ^(contribs) 04:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Kip: I think you can nominate once the season starts and its row added, you don't need to wait until the end. --PresN 11:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh good, that was my thought as well. Just make sure to include a last updated date somewhere so that we can tell when it's accurate as of (even though some people might actually update it after game). Hey man im josh (talk) 11:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I have been creating articles for the Art of Fighting trilogy, including it's director Matsumoto (cant find more sources for what he did after 3), the three individual games, and the protagonist Ryo Sakazaki. Ryo is currently Afd but I Made a big search to give the reception sources focused on different sides on him besides reviews, various sides of the characters, etc. If possible could You create a navigation box for the franchise? I'm not good at making then but after learning SNK would continue making more games I wanted to improve the articles. Cheers Tintor2 (talk) 02:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Sure, {{Art of Fighting}}. --PresN 03:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tintor2 (talk) 03:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of miniopterids, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Giants2008 (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

• Asilvering
• Significa liberdade

• Good Olfactory
• Hesperian
• I JethroBT
• TommyBoy
• Woody

CheckUser changes

• Barkeep49
• Izno

• Doug Weller
• Spicy

Guideline and policy news

• Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
• Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
• An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
• Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

Miscellaneous

• If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

I plan to give Laguna Loire from ff8 an article. This is the sandbox I made today. If you are interested feel free to correct. User:Tintor2/sandbox I was advised to first put it review but I never did that so I'm not if it is fitting. Cheers Tintor2 (talk) 22:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Looks good in terms of content, though it needs a thorough copyedit- the writing has some odd contortions like "While the face had no difficulties in being drawn". --PresN 01:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of molossids, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For your amazing work on those mammal lists! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Thanks so much! --PresN 13:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After seeing your ping on Discord, I used the information you provided to complete the List of manids article. Please take a look at it, and let me know of what you think. Thanks. Wolverine X-eye ^{(talk to me)} 23:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolverine X-eye: Looks really good! Glad to see other people doing animal lists! --PresN 01:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm hoping to bring it to FL-status. Any advice before I proceed with this? Wolverine X-eye ^{(talk to me)} 05:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolverine X-eye: Mini-review:

• Is it intentional that it's list of "manids" rather than list of "philodotans"? There's a weak consensus to name these after the 'highest' group that holds them all
• Indian pangolin gives the length of the tongue rather than the tail but no others do
• Maps captions inconsistent between "current range in (color)", "extant range in (color)", "range in (color)", and nothing
• Your cladogram includes extinct species, but there's no text explicitly stating that they're prehistoric (or what Scale_H4 & Scale_H8 means)
• Lede says vaguely that they're found in a lot of habitats, but it's actually just savanna, forest, grassland and shrubland (plus artificial)
• I'd personally call out that 3 of the species are classified as Critically Endangered right after you say they're all threatened, but that's a personal preference
• Lede says "many" extinct species have been found, but the cladogram has only 6

That's it I think; I've made some tweaks and there's some style differences from my lists that are perfectly valid, but it's basically ready for FLC! --PresN 13:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Completed all except the first one, which I think needs more weigh in from others. Regarding H4 and H8, they are just scale samples for an unknown species. That said, I really appreciate this mini-review. The FLC has been created and is now in progress. Wolverine X-eye ^{(talk to me)} 15:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
• MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
• Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
• Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

• Crisco 1492

• Babajobu
• Daniel
• Elf
• Jayron32
• Thue
• Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

Maxim

Oversighter changes

Maxim

Guideline and policy news

• Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
• Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.

Technical news

• Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

• RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
• The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.

Miscellaneous

• An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of vespertilionines, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with that one. I was planning to make that one into a Four Award someday, but I think you'd do a better job. If you want a general copyedit or maybe some help with reception let me know. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fathoms Below: Thanks, will do! --PresN 21:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On Template:Mammals, I added Atlantogenata to the template, but when I did that, the part that said “Eutheria” was gone. Can you fix this, please? Afranklady (talk) 20:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Afranklady: Fixed. --PresN 23:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of myotines, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

• Ahecht
• DoubleGrazing
• Dr vulpes
• FOARP
• Peaceray
• Queen of Hearts
• Rsjaffe
• SD0001
• SilverLocust
• Sohom Datta
• ThadeusOfNazereth
• Voorts

• Ajpolino
• Fathoms Below
• Pppery
• Tamzin
• Worm That Turned

• Aervanath
• Christopher Sundita
• Dank
• Dennis Brown
• Dragons flight
• Fastily
• Graham87
• JaGa
• Kbh3rd
• Marine 69-71
• Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington
• Yamamoto Ichiro

Interface administrator changes

• SD0001
• Sohom Datta

Pppery

CheckUser changes

• Spicy
• TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RFC, the policy on restoration of adminship has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
• Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, T5, has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.

Technical news

• Technical volunteers can now register for the 2025 Wikimedia Hackathon, which will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. Application for travel and accommodation scholarships is open from November 12 to December 10, 2024.

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Yasuke (formerly titled Backlash to diversity and inclusion) has been closed.
• An arbitration case titled Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 14 December.

I went ahead and added range maps for those that were missing them in the lagomorph lists. Though the Korean pika is missing one on the IUCN red list right now. I am a complete novice in inkscape so apologies for the incongruity but I hope it helps - I'm aiming to make Lagomorpha a good topic eventually. If you have any suggestions on how I could make these better or where I can get better maps, any specific style fixes that are needed, or if there are particular criteria that could be followed better across the topic it would help a lot! Reconrabbit 21:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reconrabbit: They look great! Wikipedia in general has a ton of missing or outdated maps, so any efforts are greatly appreciated. IUCN is the best source in general; they let you download "shape files" but I don't know how to turn those into svgs, I'm also a novice at inkscape. I think what you've been doing is great. I think only very optional suggestions I have is that for some with smaller areas, like File:Ochotona-coreana-CIS.svg, you could crop/zoom in closer to just, like, the bottom-right quarter of that image? It's a judgement call, though, since you still want it to be understandable to people who aren't familiar with the coastline, it just makes it hard to see the colored area when it's a small map image like in the tables in those lists so readers may have to click on them to zoom in. Also, any blank map is fine, but I think File:BlankMap-World.svg is easier to make out at small sizes just because it's a bit darker, but that's just my personal opinion. Looking forward to the good topic! --PresN 02:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to "zoom in" or crop the image to make it easier to see the range, but couldn't figure out how to do that in Inkscape, and following the tutorials seems to provide a different definition of "crop". If I could figure that out I would do this with the BlankMap-World.svg, but there is then the issue of not showing the curve of the projection, and there aren't good versions of that map that are centered on Korea and India (though apparently there are Python scripts to rotate and apply shapes). Reconrabbit 03:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, noting something on the Robust cottontail: IUCN describes it as the Davis Mountains cottontail, but ASM doesn't even mention the common names of Davis Mountain or Holzner's cottontail, and MSW3 doesn't provide a vernacular name at all. Reconrabbit 03:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I made a couple a few years ago, and I think I just found a way to select an area and print it to a png? It's been a while. I think what you have is perfectly fine.

As to the cottontail: IUCN has S. robustus (as Davis Mountains cottontail) and not S. holzneri (as anything), MSW3 has S. robustus (no name) and S. f. holzneri (no name), and ASM has S. holzneri (as Robust Cottontail) but no robustus. Messy! The rules for WP:MAMMALS, which I follow more stringently than Wikipedia at large does because I'm just one person and I need clear rules to keep track of ~50 lists, say basically best 2 of 3. So, IUCN and MSW3 have robustus, so it gets a row, and only ASM has holzneri, so it doesn't. So, we need a name for robustus, and... IUCN calls it Davis Mountains cottontail, and so does Wikipedia (even if it moves it to a subspecies, which again per the rules it shouldn't); nothing in the article says that robust cottontail is a name for robustus, it says it's a name for holzneri. So, the robustus row gets Davis Mountains cottontail. Bonus points that since Davis Mountains cottontail redirects to the holzneri page, it's slightly less confusing that the link name is for the robustus subspecies there, not for the holzneri species. --PresN 03:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I've figured out the process to make those range maps, now that I've got QGIS up and running on my computer (see Alpine pika). I'd be happy to contribute any for future terrestrial mammal lists. I have moved on to attempt working on List of octodontids, for which your FLs have been a massive resource. More of these may be forthcoming thanks to my recent procurement of Volume 6 of the Lynx Edicions Mammal Species Handbook, though its taxonomic data is out of date in some places. Reconrabbit 16:33, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reconrabbit: Awesome! That range map looks great! Since I did that list, I've gotten the Lynx Edicion "All the Mammals of the World" book, which is just the drawing+range+size for each species but was up to date as of 2023, so if you need any of that for anything newer than 2016, let me know and I can take a photo of the page(s). --PresN 16:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, PresN. I'm just posting to let you know that Hugo Award for Best Professional Editor – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 3, 2025. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I nominated Kiruko to GA but the reviewer failed it because he is too busy to check it. Can't I just ask for another reviewer instead? First time this happens to me. Tintor2 (talk) 14:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait. I didn't notice that he renominate it for another reviewer to take it.Tintor2 (talk) 00:23, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of murinines, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— 16:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC) CaptainGalaxy 16:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, Merry Christmas! I hope you enjoyed the parties. Ever since late November I nominated Kiruko but the reviewing has been taking kinda long time. However, before the second review, the user requested for another opinion about the article size and nobody has commented it. I tried avoiding to the article too big to avoid the issues that led Ryo Sakazaki being nearly deleted last months and instead went to use recent FAs like Claire Redfield as model to follow. If possible, could you provide a response? No idea when this might end.Tintor2 (talk) 00:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, PresN. I'm just posting to let you know that List of pilosans – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 27, 2025. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.

For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

Sennecaster

• Daniel
• Hog Farm

• BozMo
• Ferret
• John M Wolfson
• MaxSem
• Panyd
• Tide rolls
• Titoxd

CheckUser changes

• Daniel
• Elli
• Liz
• ScottishFinnishRadish
• Theleekycauldron

Worm That Turned

Ferret

Oversight changes

• Daniel
• Elli
• Liz
• ScottishFinnishRadish
• Theleekycauldron

Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RFC, Wikipedia:Notability (species) was adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.

Technical news

• The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

• Following the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Liz, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, Theleekycauldron, Worm That Turned.

Miscellaneous

• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of kerivoulines, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sea of Stars you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Video Game Barnstar
		For keeping the new article announcements running. Thank you for your hard work! QuicoleJR (talk) 15:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sea of Stars you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sea of Stars for comments about the article, and Talk:Sea of Stars/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 00:43, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But my edit desc is: "first non exclusive was beautiful katamari. That's X360. That was... 10 years ago? 15? This game is for the people".

You being the editor that created that page doesn't give you a privilege to undo works of others, even if you don't like the edit. the edit is valid. The game was developed for PS2 for 2 games, and it says so in their entry, but saying the entire series is for it is plain wrong. please read WP:OWN. 85.250.17.30 (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on talk page, you don't need to start the same discussion in two places. --PresN 12:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heyo, you may or may not remeber that we briefly talked about what to do with List of Crystal Dynamics video games some time back. While the main article is now a GA, the listicle remains in very poor shape. Since I currently do not (and likely won't soon) have the time for big rewriting projects, are you still interested in taking this one on? Regards, IceWelder [✉] 21:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@IceWelder: Probably not, to be honest. I made it more clear last year what games they had been a publisher for in the 90s, and I just replaced one odd ref, but I don't think I've ever played any of their games so I'm not that invested in the list. I'd be willing to swap it over from the current template structure to something more like List of Blizzard Entertainment games if you want, but I'm not interested at the moment in tracking down refs for exact release dates and collections/compilations releases which would be the next, lengthy step to bring it in line with that list. --PresN 01:41, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I figured this would be the case. Thanks anyway! Perhaps I'll slog through it eventually. If the article is irreperable, though, I will retain a redirect as a last-resort option. IceWelder [✉] 17:24, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PresN, I noticed that you work on many gaming-related articles, including Infinity Blade. I have created a draft about Donald Mustard, video game industry veteran and creative director behind the Infinity Blade trilogy. Since I work for AGBO, where Mustard is now a partner, I'm not publishing the article directly. Would you please review the draft in my userspace (User:SarahCaruso/Donald Mustard), editing as you see fit, and move it to mainspace? I'd appreciate it, thanks! SarahCaruso (talk) 21:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SarahCaruso: Hi, unfortunately I'm not comfortable moving the article to mainspace; the way it's written right now is like an advertisement for Mustard, with puffed up phrases like "led the game to its iconic status within pop culture". It manages simultaneously to not give details on what he actually did in the games he had a direct hand in, but also ascribe everything in Fortnite to him, and I can't trust the sources you used to back that up- you said "He also initiated the creation of live events in the game", which first of all is awful corporate-speak, but the source you used never says he did that, just that he was the CCO of Epic and that also Fortnite "became known for cultural crossovers". So, in order to feel comfortable moving it to mainspace, I'd have to rewrite half of it and check every source, and that's too much. Mustard is notable enough for an article, but I don't think this is the one. --PresN 13:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your feedback, PresN. I've noted your points and will rethink the approach to the draft and rewrite accordingly, to the best of my ability. I hope you'll be willing to take another look once I'm finished.

To relate to some of your comments, I ran into two challenges when creating the draft and wonder if you may have any guidance: First, much of the details of Mustard's specific roles in the games can only be found in RS in interviews, which I intentionally avoided as I know it's frowned upon to reference too many non-independent sources. Would you suggest including some and noting in the text that it's a personal account (e.g., "According to Mustard...")? And second, many of the articles about Mustard tend to take a hagiographic tone, so I tried to walk a fine line of avoiding excessive praise while keeping as close as possible to what's expressed in the sources. I realize that I need to work harder to avoid the puffed up tone even if the RS frames him that way.

Regarding the sentence in the draft about his creation of live events, I want to point out that the Axios reference does cover this ("Mustard also led work on building dramatic, live events in Fortnite that all players would witness at the same time"). I feel it's important to note this because, while I accept your point about "corporate-speak," I put a lot of effort into checking that all the content passes verification, and I want to make sure you and others here recognize that I'm editing in good faith.

I'd appreciate any input and will be back in touch once I've updated the draft. Thanks again. SarahCaruso (talk) 19:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SarahCaruso: Alright, I felt bad about it because he really should have an article and you did a very good job of one overall, and I appreciate that you tried to tone it down (and that articles about him are pretty hagiographic, as you say), so I did some editing on it and moved it to mainspace. What you proposed about sourcing his specific roles to interviews and attributing it to him in the text is perfectly fine; I've watchlisted the article so if you have any proposals just put them on the talk page and I'll add them in without you having to wait around forever. --PresN 02:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, PresN! I appreciate your time and continued guidance. I will post any future suggestions at the article's talk page. SarahCaruso (talk) 01:46, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of emballonurids, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).

Administrator changes

• Arcticocean
• Wugapodes

Euryalus

CheckUser changes

• Firefly
• L235

Oversighter changes

• Firefly
• Guerillero
• L235
• Moneytrees

Technical news

• Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
• A 'Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been closed.

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of nycterids, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

With help from KungFuman I managed to create an article for Ángel (The King of Fighters). Sadly, I am having problems with my monitor and the old one I am using can't let me upload nonfree images in Wikipedia for some reason. If possible, could you upload the infobox image for the character? This might be the best image for the character since it's a concept art made by the most famous SNK artist, Eisuke Ogura, and can easily be found in the wiki or an artbook. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Not clear on how a monitor could affect uploading non-free images? But done in any case. --PresN 19:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You see, two weeks ago my monitor was nearly burning and I sent it to repair. When I found the older monitor, I found that for some reason Wikipedia doesn't allow me to upload images for some reason so I also asked in Discord a user to upload a picture of Ryu Hayabusa as I was trying to expand on his notability. Tintor2 (talk) 20:58, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As a reminder, we are no longer disqualifying the lowest-scoring contestants; everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned from Wikipedia. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. Unlike the round points in the main WikiCup table, which are reset at the end of each round, tournament points are carried over between rounds and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far.

Round 1 was very competitive compared with previous years; two contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 500 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,168 round points, mainly from 4 featured articles and 4 good articles on old military history, in addition to an assortment of GA and FA reviews.
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, mainly from 2 FAs, 2 featured lists, 8 GAs, and 16 Did You Know articles mainly on historical topics.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions), with 866 round points from 20 GAs, 23 DYKs, and 2 In the News articles primarily about athletes.
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with 846 round points from 16 GAs about radio and TV stations, 45 GA reviews, and 3 DYKs.
• Hey man im josh (submissions), with 816 round points from 5 FLs about sports and Olympic topics, 46 FL reviews, 3 ITN articles, and a large number of bonus points.
• MaranoFan (submissions), with 815 round points primarily from 3 FAs and 1 GA about music, in addition to 9 article reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 18 featured articles, 26 featured lists, 1 featured-topic article, 197 good articles, 38 good-topic articles and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 23 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 550 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2, which begins on 1 March. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

Administrator changes

• Jarry1250
• Lethe

CheckUser changes

• AmandaNP
• Drmies

Oversighter changes

AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment is open to discuss whether AI-generated images (meaning those wholly created by generative AI, not human-created images modified with AI tools) should be banned from use in articles.
• A series of 22 mini-RFCs that double-checked consensus on some aspects and improved certain parts of the administrator elections process has been closed (see the summary of the changes).
• A request for comment is open to gain consensus on whether future administrator elections should be held.

Technical news

• A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
• Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378

Miscellaneous

• The 2025 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, Arcticocean, Ameisenigel, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, Galahad, Nehaoua, Renvoy, Revi C., RoySmith, Teles and Zafer as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
• Following the 2025 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: 1234qwer1234qwer4, AramilFeraxa, Daniuu, KonstantinaG07, MdsShakil and XXBlackburnXx.

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! :) Found this [3]

Not sure where to put this though. Timur9008 (talk) 11:57, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Timur9008: Found a spot, thanks! --PresN 12:40, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FLR link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:43, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Animal Well you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tarlby -- Tarlby (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PresN, would you mind taking a look at another draft I created, for screenwriter and producer Angela Russo-Otstot (User:SarahCaruso/Angela Russo-Otstot)? While I realize that your primary interest is video games, I appreciated your perspective in our discussion about Donald Mustard and thought it would be a good idea to run this draft by you as well. Thank you! SarahCaruso (talk) 19:26, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SarahCaruso: Sure, why not. Made some tweaks and moved to Angela Russo-Otstot. --PresN 01:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Good Article, but I do not see it in Wikipedia:Good articles/all. Am I missing something? I would be happy to add it to that list, if you can't or don't want to add it yourself. Do you think it would be better under Chess or under Engineering technology (or Software, or some other category)? Bruce leverett (talk) 01:27, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruce leverett: It's in Wikipedia:Good articles/all2. --PresN 01:53, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, don't know how I missed that. Bruce leverett (talk) 02:32, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PresN. I noticed your recent contributions, especially your featured list articles. I invite you to help me on my quest to improve the coverage of Wii U-related articles. Currently, i have Wii U GamePad nominated for GA, but could you help get List of Wii U games for featured list? Thanks. TzarN64 (talk) 01:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TzarN64: I did some accessibility fixes on the table since I'm well-versed in them, but I'm not going to work on the list beyond that. It's going to be a massive amount of work to find sources for the release dates for ~800 games in 4 regions, and I'm not particularly interested in the Wii U. --PresN 02:05, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, nonetheless. Please give me your thoughts on the article and how it can be improved. Thanks. TzarN64 (talk) 02:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Animal Well you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Animal Well and Talk:Animal Well/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tarlby -- Tarlby (talk) 00:41, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Animal Well you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Animal Well for comments about the article, and Talk:Animal Well/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tarlby -- Tarlby (talk) 01:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, PresN. I'm just posting to let you know that List of emballonurids – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 21. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:55, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2025).

Administrator changes

• Giraffer
• Goldsztajn

Dennis Brown

• Cyclonebiskit
• Nohat
• Someguy1221

Bureaucrat changes

Barkeep49

CheckUser changes

0xDeadbeef

Oversighter changes

GB fan

Moneytrees

Miscellaneous

• Sign up for The Core Contest, a competition running from 15 April to 31 May to improve vital articles.

Hello, I noticed that you changed a part of {{Election box candidate no party no change}} to include a missing rowscope. I'm not sure if this is what is causing a massive change in the template, but I've noticed that the election box now doesn't match with other types of election boxes, as it now has a dark grey and bolded part instead of having a lighter grey and non-bolded part with the rest of it. Compare these two:

I'm not sure if this was the intended result, but I personally don't think it should be different for these two. Especially since the "winning candidate" isn't differentiated anymore. reppop^talk 20:49, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reppop: Sorry about that, I don't think I realized how many variations of election boxes there were last night. I've added a bit more to ensure there's no visual change; I don't think that's ideal but it's way better than a mishmash of visual styles. --PresN 22:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It being centered is still bothering me since it still visually doesn't match with the other election box, I think you should also fix that to be flush left. reppop^talk 22:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reppop: Done. Really obnoxious that wikimedia applies extra styles to row headers, and also different ones depending on if it's the "first" cell in the row. --PresN 23:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take a look at your other changes for the other election box templates? I noticed on this page that {{Election box candidate with party link no change}} is now centered, and doesn't match with the other templates above. reppop^talk 18:24, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reppop: Fixed- the template pages had them as left-aligned, but the article didn't. Now forced left. --PresN 19:57, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, PresN! The list you nominated, List of phyllostomids, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I was editing Laguna's draft here but I was wondering what article does this site have the article from Flaregamer has it in order to find the original reliable sources to see if we can I create and then nominate it due to the GA topic need. If possible, could you lend me a hand with Laguna? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:48, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: I'm not clear on what you're asking here. I'm also not sure that FFOnline or FlareGamer are RSs. I'm not available to work on Laguna's article, sorry. --PresN 16:07, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I understand Tintor2 (talk) 16:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]