User talk:EricPfromTustin

Welcome to Wikipedia, EricPfromTustin! Thank you for your contributions. I am 78.26 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the cookies! EricPfromTustin (talk) 17:37, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EricPfromTustin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

thank you EricPfromTustin (talk) 19:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has tone issues, because it reads like an advertisement, and notability issues. It does not establish corporate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shot Tower Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the feedback! Will keep working on it - there are tons of coverage on this company. EricPfromTustin (talk) 20:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EricPfromTustin,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Shot Tower Capital should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shot Tower Capital .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Mduvekot (talk) 17:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EricPfromTustin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shot Tower Capital for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mduvekot (talk) 18:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]