User talk:Cambalachero

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

The redirect Life as we do not know it has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 27 § Life as we do not know it until a consensus is reached.

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:16, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks so much for taking pity on me and spending your time to help me with the AFD process. I truly appreciate it! DuckOfOrange (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you have done work over at the "One World Under Doom" page. While I know that you don't want subplots that may or may not tie-in to the main story later out of fear and/or concern that the page would get too long, anyone like @Fiction Fanatic III: would've condensed them to the good parts like that user did to the previous two storylines. Of course we will have to keep an eye on some of the tie-in issues like the Superior Avengers series that includes a Doctor Octopus that isn't Otto Octavius (who was said to have joined an incarnation of the Masters of Evil in this storyline) or Caroyln Trainor and have what we learned about each tie-in issue added to the different character pages and group pages. I just wanted to let you know that. --Rtkat3 (talk) 23:56, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the article Human Engineering Research Laboratories (which you accepted at AFC) back to Draft:Human Engineering Research Laboratories because I believe it was published from the AFC process prematurely. The article had incorporated much material from the Human Engineering Laboratory article, but these are apparently different facilities. When that material was removed, the remaining article was barely a shell with no citations. You are free to continue to develop the draft and resubmit for AFC evaluation. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very well, I will never review AFC drafts again. Have it your way. Cambalachero (talk) 16:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was not my intention to discourage you from reviewing AFC drafts, just to inform you that this one particular article that you reviewed has been re-draftified. We all make mistakes. The article, at the time you reviewed it, appeared quite properly sourced. It was just an unfortunate misunderstanding that most of the material in the article was actually relevant to a different, but similarly-named, facility. I hope you reconsider; WP:AFC needs all the help it can get. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a problem with you or with AFC specifically. I'm starting to realize that the Wikipedia community is a highly toxic and ungrateful environment. I won't help anyone anymore, because nobody ever helps me. Whatever I do on Wikipedia from now on, I will do it all by myself, no more wikiprojects, drives, cleanup... that, or leave the project altogether, I'm not decided yet. Cambalachero (talk) 17:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cambalachero. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Habitability of Earth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cambalachero. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Argentine economic crisis (2011-current), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You closed my thread at WP:AN#Trump's Justice Department has launched an attack on Wikipedia and the WMF on the basis that it violated WP:NOTAFORUM which says Stay on the task of creating an encyclopedia. The purpose of the Administrators noticeboard is for posting information and issues that affect administrators. The letter written by the Acting United States Attorney for the District of Columbia specifically refers to Wikipedia administrators on page 3 point 6. Did you read the letter before shutting down discussion? I happen to be an adminstrator and notice that you aren't. I do not think that it is appropriate for you to close a discussion at the noticeboard for administrators to discuss things of interest to administrators, and I completely disagree that this is a matter for only the WMF to deal with. I urge you to revert your close. Cullen328 (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this thread (and the close). I don't have a strong opinion on the close itself - there isn't much administrators can do, and so I can see the argument that it may be beneficial to close it to avoid WP:FORUM violations. However, I do think that if and only if closing the AN thread is deemed appropriate, it should be closed with a reference to WP:VP/WMF where the issue was also posted, as that is a more appropriate place to discuss it. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 02:49, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]