User talk:AvyuktOrai

Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of an article. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I am AvyuktOrai Noted, with thanks AvyuktOrai (talk) 12:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AlphaBetaGamma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gujarat Anti-corruption Bureau, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am @AvyuktOrai, I have included the reliable citation. Thanks for pointing out the changes @AlphaBetaGamma. AvyuktOrai (talk) 13:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Kannauj railway station, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Diannaa (talk) 22:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the draft you submitted, The content related to establishment of the supermarket is repeated 3 times in the article. I would suggest you to remove the unwanted repetition and make the article concise. Also, some claims do not seem to have sources, and I have mentioned them in the article. Try to find them! Happy editing! Warriorglance(talk to me) 14:31, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted with Thanks and pointing it out. AvyuktOrai (talk) 06:24, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nadeem Jafri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 14:26, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you had moved Draft:Nadeem Jafri into the wrong name space (Wikipedia:, which is the project space), so I moved it back to Draft:. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update, Really appreaicte it.

Could you help me to move it to the main namespace as now its follows for the necessary requirements. AvyuktOrai (talk) 13:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the above and your question on my User Talk page, you submitted your revised draft article for review just a couple of hours ago, so it is awaiting review, as per the message at the top of the Draft. When it is reviewed, if the reviewer considers it suitable, it will be moved into main space. AllyD (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted with Thanks AvyuktOrai (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nadeem Jafri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 10:27, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nadeem Jafri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Almandavi (talk) 05:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]