User talk:69.181.17.113

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Amy Ryan has been reverted.
Your edit here to Amy Ryan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://ethnicelebs.com/amy-ryan) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Christopher McDonald are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 15:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am discussing improvements to main page!

69.181.17.113 (talk) 15:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Death of Gareth Williams. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. R0paire 22:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Los Angeles Central Library. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 05:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TESSA is part of Los Angeles Central Library ......... 69.181.17.113 (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to St. Denis Medical, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 01:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what do you not understand? ...69.181.17.113 (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is inappropriate to include put a bunch of reliable sources about the actress herself on the TV series article as it is an article about the TV series and not the actress herself. — YoungForever^(talk) 01:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the actress herself is a sub-topic that needs sources just like production history and reception otherwise actors would not have wikilinks from articles about productions they performed in. ... 69.181.17.113 (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the TV series article is not the actress' article. — YoungForever^(talk) 04:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 69.181.17.113! The thread you created at the Teahouse, selling citations by pqasb.pqarchiver.com, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 69.181.17.113! The thread you created at the Teahouse, List of Canadian television channels available in Canada, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Ruth Buzzi.

Why are you putting all this stuff between  ? STOP IT - FlightTime (open channel) 19:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

comments and background for further research

It looks like you just deleted everything I did without evaluating any thing

... 69.181.17.113 (talk) 19:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"What hell are you doing?"

69.181.17.113 (talk) 19:54, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 01:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

huh?

69.181.17.113 (talk) 01:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Pay-Pay.  【💬】 20:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not advertising! 69.181.17.113 (talk) 20:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.iberollingpapers.es/en/about-us/paper-tradition/

is a history of rolling paper where Pay-Pay is made

69.181.17.113 (talk) 20:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 69.181.17.113. You have new messages at WP:Teahouse#Antonio Monda.
Message added Mathglot (talk) 19:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello 69.181.17.113! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Kiwi Farms, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines for stand-alone lists. Thank you!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of notable Macro Advisory Partners LLP partners and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 69.181.17.113! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 69.181.17.113! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Antonio Monda, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 69.181.17.113! The thread you created at the Teahouse, List of films shot near Victoria, British Columbia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 69.181.17.113! Your additions to Bruno of Hollywood, NYC have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jalen Barks (Woof) 15:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JalenBarks:

You are wrong. The there was a quote of two sentences from the NY Times. There are larger prior quotes on wikipedia. The image is from wikimedia commons. please acknowledge and restore.

Tony Bruno is "Bruno of Hollywood, NYC"

Bruno Bernard is Bruno Bernard, and never used "Bruno of Hollywood, NYC"

thank you

69.181.17.113 (talk) 03:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Jane Levy. Binksternet (talk) 16:38, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

huh? 69.181.17.113 (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whoogle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caleb Stanford (talk) 00:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

assistant professor of computer science at UC Davis:

Whoogle was killed by Google (non-javascript block)

I saw Whoogle mentioned in articles about privacy and browsers

It was a way to avoid subsidizing Google via privacy invasion

69.181.17.113 (talk) 00:42, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

L. W. Frohlich, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk) 10:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Indivisible movement. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 00:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

not "test edits"

69.181.17.113 (talk) 00:39, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to The Realest Real have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  
Your edit here to The Realest Real was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.dazeddigital.com/fashion/article/32031/1/see-the-trailer-for-kenzo-s-new-short-starring-kim-gordon) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sydne Rome. Thank you. ~Liance^talk 00:13, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 04:43, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Talk:Russia have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cactusisme. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Scotch-Brite because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 05:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with... L. W. Frohlich

Adam Tanner contradicts The New York Times

• Tanner, Adam (January 12, 2017). "The Gay Jewish Immigrant Whose Company Sells Your Medical Secrets". The Forward. Archived from the original on January 22, 2021. Retrieved 30 March 2025.
• Tanner, Adam (10 January 2017). Our Bodies, Our Data: How Companies Make Billions Selling Our Medical Records. Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0-8070-3334-0. Retrieved 30 March 2025 – via archive.org.
• "L. W. Frohlich; led ad agency". The New York Times. 29 September 1971. p. 36. Archived from the original on November 14, 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2025.

Adam Tanner, the author of the book “Our Bodies, Our Data: How Companies Make Billions Selling Our Medical Records.” and The Jewish Daily Forward's "The Secret Life of the Gay Jewish Immigrant Whose Company Sells Your Medical Information" contradicts The New York Times obituary.

Update with The Jewish Daily Forward article and discount The New York Times obituary?

obituary versus book? New book should win over old obituary...

69.181.17.113 (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I see that you asked a similar question at Talk:L. W. Frohlich, which is the best place to have the discussion. I suggest you post some more details there, to point out what exactly Tanner wrote that contradicts the Times obituary, and exactly what changes you are proposing. If no one answers in a few days, you can be bold and make the change yourself. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 01:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

contradicts are in https://web.archive.org/web/20210122222245/https://forward.com/news/359832/the-secret-life-of-the-gay-jewish-immigrant-whose-company-sells-your-medica/

69.181.17.113 (talk) 01:38, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

asked a similar question at Talk:L. W. Frohlich and no response

69.181.17.113 (talk) 01:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Liance. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Sydne Rome, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ~Liance^talk 00:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q449373 69.181.17.113 (talk) 00:11, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q449373 says 1951

Sydne Rome (born March 17, 1951) on most languages of wikipedia

Sydne Rome (born March 17, 1946) on en.wikipedia.org

her bio is impossible for (born March 17, 1951)

69.181.17.113 (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wikidata is wrong and all other languages of wikipedia are wrong 69.181.17.113 (talk) 02:31, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

H there! The English Wikipedia article Sydne Rome has references to two American newspapers that support the 1946 date. Feel free to discuss this further on Talk:Sydne Rome with published reliable sources for the 1951 date. Happy editing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoingBatty (talk • contribs) 02:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NOT HELPED

The English Wikipedia article Sydne Rome IS CORRECT 1946

www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q449373 is wrong (born March 17, 1951)

all other languages of wikipedia are wrong (born March 17, 1951)

69.181.17.113 (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your English Wikipedia account should enable you to log into Wikidata and correct the error. Be sure to point to the Sunday Telegraph Magazine article as your source for this date being correct. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:23, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcgnh: no Wikipedia account .... 69.181.17.113 (talk) 04:57, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's no excuse. I was able to add the date and reference to Wikidata using an incognito window, no login required. I was, however, unable to navigate the Wikidata qualifiers and parameters to mark this date as the preferred date based on the best substantiated reference - the other date refs are all to databases with no inherent authority. I tried, but the values were not accepted, even though they were on the list. If you want to try your hand at fixing Wikidata, please have at it, account or no account. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:45, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh well ....69.181.17.113 (talk) 06:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with... Tour Hekla vandalism by User talk:50.219.108.59

69.181.17.113 (talk) 11:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reported at WP:AIV, admin should block them, soon. Thanks for the revert! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Also, not sure why would would create an article and a citations needed tag.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gallup Sun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 22:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitting without improvement is disruptive. Outside of ProPublica, sources are brief mentions or comments by those affiliated which is not nearly enough to meet the notability criteria. If resubmitted without relevant substantial improvement, the draft may be rejected meaning it will no longer be considered.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gallup Sun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 22:24, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]