This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
2006 Dutch/Australian Offensive is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan
This article is in urgent need of inline citations, as detailed information has been presented on a salient and contentious international issue.--Soulparadox 07:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Agreed. Just letting you know I have added some in line citations, and hopefully there are more to follow. Where would one find sources for the types of weapons used in the operation where it says 'Citation needed'?DaltonCastle (talk) 06:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cleanup and Copy Edits
I've done some major editing of this page and have hopefully gotten most of the needed edits done. Still I would like someone to clarify, give feedback, or edit some more before the issue box is removed. I don't want to prematurely take it down. I might reconsider, though, if I go through and edit it once more.DaltonCastle (talk) 06:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]