Talk:102nd Intelligence Wing

102nd Intelligence Wing was one of the Warfare good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones Date Process Result May 27, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed June 10, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed July 15, 2008 Good article nominee Listed July 23, 2008 WikiProject A-class review Not approved August 11, 2008 WikiProject A-class review Not approved November 23, 2008 WikiProject A-class review Not approved January 8, 2009 WikiProject A-class review Not approved October 31, 2009 WikiProject peer review Reviewed May 9, 2010 WikiProject A-class review Approved March 8, 2011 Featured article candidate Not promoted April 14, 2011 WikiProject peer review Reviewed December 14, 2016 WikiProject A-class review Demoted January 7, 2025 Good article reassessment Delisted Current status: Delisted good article

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / Intelligence / North America / United States / Cold War / Post-Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Intelligence task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Post-Cold War task force Additional information: /  This article has failed an A-Class review. History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Massachusetts / Boston / Cape Cod and the Islands / September 11 Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Cape Cod and the Islands (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject September 11, 2001 (assessed as High-importance). France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

• There are uncited statements throughout the article, including almost the entire "History" section.
• The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article.

Is anyone interested in addressing the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 04:14, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Among other items, the article says the 102nd is descended from the 318th Fighter Group and the 67th Fighter Wing. Other than the fact that both can't be true, neither is. There are other factual errors in the history section. Lineagegeek (talk) 17:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]