User talk:Landingdude13: Difference between revisions

Welcome Landingdude13!

Hey Landingdude13—thanks for your recent contributions. I noticed your interest in Wikipedia's video game content and thought you might be interested in the video games WikiProject. We've done some great work (over 200 pieces of Featured content and over 600 Good articles), but there is plenty more to do. Come say hello on our talk page, participate in our current events, or let me know if I can help with anything. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia and I hope I'll see you around! czar ♔ 03:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to let you know that you don't need to "fix" links that already redirect to the correct page. See the article linked in the section title. Happy editing! TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 02:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm McGeddon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2048 (video game), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 08:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of full budget downloadable PlayStation 4 games, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of full budget downloadable PlayStation 3 games. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm here to discuss the usefulness of this template. I'm aware that other, similar templates currently exist for currently running series in magazines, such as {{Series in Weekly Shōnen Jump}} and {{Series in Hana to Yume}} (as well as 7 others), but a template of this nature for series that simply appeared in a magazine are rare (the only examples I can think of are the {{Weekly Shōnen Jump - 1968–1979}} family, and that's only for the most notable series for those years). So before you might have been thinking about doing similar templates for Gangan Comics magazines, I would ask that you reconsider the usefulness of the template in its current form, and if perhaps we can't reshape it to be more in line with the first two templates I linked. However, since there appears to only be 3 or 4 series that are currently still being serialized in the magazine that have articles, it may be better to simply delete the template and go with a category instead. I apologize, I didn't notice at first that the templates had already been created by another editor last year. However, I still think that navboxes such as this and {{Comic Flapper}} may not be necessary, and that a category may be a better way to organize all the series that were serialized in these magazines, such as with Category:Dengeki Daioh. Just {{ping}} me here so we can keep the discussion in one place.--十八 10:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We appear to have a number of overlapping PlayStation 4 game list articles:

1. List of PlayStation 4 games
2a. List of full budget downloadable PlayStation 4 games
2b. List of downloadable PlayStation 4 network games

As these pages are going to get longer each year, perhaps it would be a good idea to employ a multipage template (e.g. List of places in Alaska (A)) and combine full budget and indie games on the same page? It would look something like this: List of PlayStation 4 games (A).

What do you think? — TPX 13:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Really, I don't think so — Landingdude13 1:30 PM, 8 February 2015

Ok. Any reason? — TPX 22:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That idea is too odd and not even good in the near future — Landingdude13 2:27 PM, 8 February 2015

I wanted to thank you for creating and updating List of PlayStation 4 games released on disc. I'm one of those weird people who only likes buying games on discs, because I have paranoid visions of a post-apocalyptic nightmare world where all the authentication servers are gone. Well it's not quite that dramatic, but I really do prefer disc-based games. So thanks! It's been very useful to me. 72.185.156.62 (talk) 20:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Welcome — Landingdude13 3:18 PM, 7 September 2015

Hey, why did u Undid my revision 753949610? --Ironekk (talk) 01:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's not even retail like all the way to the world. --Landingdude13 12:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So tell me what is that? https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B9CeBsPNh-AGZ19qUldMLTZ2TWc?usp=sharing --Ironekk (talk) 18:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You're invited to express your views about this topic on the discussion topic. Jotamide (talk) 05:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Electricburst1996. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2015 in American television, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Per WP:V, content must be verifiable, and it's unclear how Dog With A Blog ending can be verified without a source. Thank you. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 19:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I've noticed the several of the titles on this list are either not true (Minecraft, Helldivers) or seem speculative (I Am Bread, Dragon Fin Soup) It's worth noting that just because it's a relatively small game doesn't mean it's going to be download only as we've seen several examples of video games this generation of small indie titles getting retail releases. --Deathawk (talk) 21:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing just ^ ^ Oussam Dz (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Since you seem new, in this edit I appreciate the change of "2016 video game" to "upcoming video game". However, changing "1986 video game" to "video game" is, for the most part, inappropriate, per WP:REDIRECT. --Izno (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I see that someone has commented exactly like this a year ago. Please don't do that. --Izno (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Landingdude13. There's been a good you are great editor to keep the released volumes of manga updated. However, as far I as remember, you always do only this. Nothing wrong with the edit itself but as long as the prose says "as of November 6, 2015, four volumes have been released" you could have updated it too, right? Sometimes you do update the prose ([1], [2]) but in both cases you do something equally troubling: you update the text but not the source. And this is especially complicated because it makes the article violate WP:V. If possible, you when you update a manga article, you could update infobox, prose, and references - and then you have a complete job. You're not obligated to, I know, and I don't want you to take it as an offense or something like that... it's just a tip as it would be good if you do it to keep the articles in a better state. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please start using edit summaries so editors can tell at a glance what changes you made to an article without having to look at the diff. This would be very helpful, especially because you appear in my watchlist a lot and I can't tell if these edits are routine maintenance or something significant. Opencooper (talk) 12:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I already know about the edit summaries and I know how to put them in. Landingdude13 11:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 21:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I need an administrator to delete this template - Template:Lerche (studio).

Why? because I already created this template - Template:Lerche and this one perfect.

Contacted me after you delete Template:Lerche (studio) at once!

Thank You. Landingdude13 11:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have deleted Template:Lerche (studio). → AA ^(talk) — 12:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. → Landingdude13 ^(talk) — 11:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can u please add the description of episodes briefly Blessing66 (talk) 18:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Landingdude13. I noticed you create a template about an anime studio Trigger, I'm a little impress.

We all know that Trigger is part of Ultra Super Pictures right?, and I was wondering that I gotta show you something, my upcoming template about Ultra Super Pictures (it's not created yet, unless you agreed).

This template's initial visibility currently defaults to autocollapse, meaning that if there is another collapsible item on the page (a navbox, sidebar, or table with the collapsible attribute), it is hidden apart from its title bar; if not, it is fully visible.

To change this template's initial visibility, the |state= parameter may be used:

• {{Landingdude13|state=collapsed}} will show the template collapsed, i.e. hidden apart from its title bar.
• {{Landingdude13|state=expanded}} will show the template expanded, i.e. fully visible.

If you like it, is it okay that I can redirect that template you created with mine or just get rid of it. It's your choice and also, my template is based on the Japanese template - ja:Template:ウルトラスーパーピクチャーズ. Landingdude13 14:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't see any problem and I like it. I agree with the offer. Even I shall create this template on AzWiki. Thank you that you asked my opinion.--White DemΩn (talk) 08:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. :) 01:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to the latest discussion about front covers of Tales of Eternia. Join the discussion. --George Ho (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2016 in American television, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 02:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Landingdude13. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Was be saying that comic strip, charge and cartoon are synonymous, when, in really, are different things!

Comic strip (tira cômica in Portuguese and tira cómica in Spanish): short duration comics, with the frames (which usually range from one to five, three being the most common) disposed and organized in the form of a strip, such as own name already implies and being or not humorous. The comic strip criticizes the values ​​of society. There are three types of comic strips: daily strips (tiras diárias in Portuguese and tiras diarias in Spanish), usually printed in small quantities because of the pace of publication, in black and white (though some in color) and three some containing one to five), Sunday boards (pranchas dominicais in Portuguese and planchas dominicales in Spanish), usually printed in large quantities, in color (although some in black and white) and with a larger number of tables occupying a entire page and the yonkomas (yonkomas same in Portuguese and Spanish), of Japanese origin, with four vertical frames (although some in the horizontal) and who always deal with serious matters, but in a humorous form. Etymology: from the American English, comic strip, comic ribbon.

Charge (charge even in Portuguese and Spanish): short duration comics, usually occupying a single frame, containing a satire or message instead of a story and being humorous (although some with more than one frame, with stories and not being humorous). The cartoon criticizes people and things of the contemporaneity. Etymology: from the Franco-Belgian French, charger, burden or exaggeration.

Cartoon (cartón in Spanish and cartum in Portuguese): short duration comics, usually occupying a single frame, containing a satire or message instead of a story and being humorous (though some with more than one frame, with stories and not being humorous). The cartoon criticizes the situations of the day to day. Due to the similarities between the first animated short films and the cartoons printed and published at the time, the animated drawing name in English also refers to cartoon, in full, animated cartoon. The same thing happens in Italian and German, where the cartoon is called, respectively, cartone animato and animierte Cartoon. Etymology: from the British English, cartoon and these of the Italian, cartone, cartone, large piece of paper, sketch, study, draft or anteproject.

Here they here the articles and verbets for be revised in the respective idioms: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tira_de_banda_desenhada, https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/charge, https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comic_strip, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editorial_cartoon, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tira_de_prensa, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exageraci%C3%B3n_burlesca, https://pt.wiktionary.org/wiki/tira_cômica, https://pt.wiktionary.org/wiki/charge, https://pt.wiktionary.org/wiki/cartum, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/comic_strip, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/charge, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cartoon, https://es.wiktionary.org/wiki/tira_cómica, https://es.wiktionary.org/wiki/charge and https://es.wiktionary.org/wiki/cartón!

Including and principally, the certain is that the Wikipedia articles (described soon above!) should receive the following names in each idiom: Tira de banda desenhada, Charge and Cartum (desenho humorístico) - in Portuguese, Comic strip, Charge (humoristic drawing) and Cartoon - in English and Tira de historieta, Charge (dibujo humorístico) and Cartón (dibujo humorístico) - in Spanish!

Remembering and highlighting that the caricature has nothing to do with the other three because isn't a form of comic: is, simply, a humoristic exaggerated drawing of something or someone, be real or not, does not even have texts!

In fact, all my editions in this sense are already being reversed, I do not know why, since I understand a lot of comics, so I am a comic drawer, writer and scripter, so that I am no amateur and layman in the Whole subject, see it!

And well, as you can see, the cartoon isn't a type of comic strip, neither the charge is a type of cartoon, if possible, please, warn to your fellow editors to make the changes, very thanks since now for all attention and interest and a hug!

Saviochristi (talk) Saviochristi (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I need an advice, i was wondering if you could fix some Japanese games that we're published by Japanese company, the article of games realted to Japanese games are always being errored through the game published in North America.

Example:Evolution 2: Far Off Promise (it does not lists Japanese publisher, but the descriptions does.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.220.94.160 (talk) 07:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lord Roem. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Yuri on Ice without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 00:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, re: your recent mass edits removing "1986" from The Legend of Zelda (video game), please see the guideline on redirects that are not broken. There was no harm in leaving them as they were, especially as the page is likely to need further disambiguation again some day.  czar 04:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: I made the exact same comment at #Edits regarding TLOZ over a year ago, and someone a year ago before that. I am concerned about this user's behavior on this point, if we've got yet a third user commenting on this issue. --Izno (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Landingdude, I recommend that you voluntarily abstain from these types of edits (mass changes of redirects) for the future, especially as you have opted to not acknowledge prior messages or otherwise explain yourself. If you do think a mass change is warranted, please first discuss it with other editors (if related to video games, at WT:VG). Is this an amicable solution? czar 05:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I got almost carried away since the upcoming video game is announced like years ago until it got a new title right now and well, let's just say that's a little bit concern. -- Landingdude13 20:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So, I came here to inform you about WP:NOTBROKEN, only to see that it seems that you've been being warned about this for years? Is there something you're not understanding about the concept of NOTBROKEN? Because your recent changing of instances of Trails of Cold Steel to ''[[The Legend of Heroes: Trails of Cold Steel|Trails of Cold Steel]]'' is the same sort of thing you've been asked to stop by multiple editors now. Sergecross73 msg me 20:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Diamond Is Unbreakable, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Making the claim that someone or something is "named after" someone or something else is the very definition of original research and has no place on Wikipedia. —Farix (t | c) 02:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to JoJolion. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 02:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does this link count as a source? [3] If so, should I add it? --Landingdude13 (talk) 04:25, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikis are user-contributed, so they can't be used as sources for anything on Wikipedia. For this sort of thing, we need to know Araki's intent - basically, we need a direct statement from Araki or his company, Lucky Land Communications, saying that a character was named after so-and-so. This can sometimes be found in interviews or in the author notes in the manga volumes. I know there have been JoJo artbooks as well in Japan, but haven't purchased any - it's possible there is some information in them that can be used, too.--IDV^talk 08:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]