User talk:Sdgedfegw: Difference between revisions
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) Tag: AWB |
Bruce leverett (talk | contribs) →Magnus Carlsen: new section |
||
Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
</table> |
</table> |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1056563377 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1056563377 --> |
||
== [[Magnus Carlsen]] == |
|||
What's up with this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1059630243&oldid=1059629967&title=Magnus_Carlsen&type=revision] edit? You reverted several previous useful corrections (including some of my own). Was this deliberate? If so, can you give your reasons? [[User:Bruce leverett|Bruce leverett]] ([[User talk:Bruce leverett|talk]]) 22:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:40, 10 December 2021
Welcome
|
Sdgedfegw, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi Sdgedfegw! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 5 April 2015 (UTC) |
Replaceable fair use File:Artist's impression of R136a1.png

Thanks for uploading File:Artist's impression of R136a1.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Oldest people
I made some more adjustment to the timelines. Please review my revision notes. Could you also make a comment on the talk page where a user was questioning the inclusion of the timelines? Nyth63 02:12, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Ways to improve WR 42e
Hi, I'm Trout71. Sdgedfegw, thanks for creating WR 42e!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The current sources provided are not sufficient and do not establish notability
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Trout 71 16:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (List of most massive exoplanets) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of most massive exoplanets, Sdgedfegw!
Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Per WP:LEADSENTENCE, lists should not begin with the redundant, lackluster "This is a list of...", no more than an article should begin "This is an article about..."
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Reference errors on 18 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Main sequence page, your edit caused a cite error (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
The Sample parameters table in Main sequence
Hi Sdgedfegw. I am sorry to say that I have taken out the lovely table of sample parameters that you added to the Main sequence article. The table is copyrighted by Richard Powell, the owner of the website that you copied it from, as he states at http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/copyright.html. Though he says his work can be used for non-commercial use, all material in Wikipedia is free for commercial use if the license terms are followed. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. StarryGrandma (talk) 03:33, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Sdgedfegw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Sdgedfegw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
What's up with this [1] edit? You reverted several previous useful corrections (including some of my own). Was this deliberate? If so, can you give your reasons? Bruce leverett (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)