Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley
1981 United States Supreme Court case
Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley, 454 U.S. 290 (1981), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated a California law that set limits on contributions to ballot issue campaigns. The ruling relies heavily on the Court's earlier decisions in Buckley v. Valeo, holding that limits on contributions to political candidates implicate the First Amendment, and First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, holding that the state governments have no compelling interest in limiting spending on speech about ballot issues.[1]
See also
References
External links
- Text of Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley, 454 U.S. 290 (1981) is available from: Cornell Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
- Supreme Court of California opinion